Sunday, May 13, 2012
Previous Posts
- Now the AQAP Double Agent Is MI5?
- “Nonconsensual Surveillance”
- Racist, Genocidal Monsters In Charge of US Militar...
- Limo Flag
- JFK Head Wound
- One Guy with a Crotch Bomb Is NOT an Ambitious Int...
- Al-CIA-duh Watch
- "Beastie Boys" Adam Yauch -- Spoke Out for Peace a...
- Now HERE'S Some Major League Disinformation
- Big Brother Watch
Recommended Reading
- The "Ultimate List" of Improbabilities and Coincidences Around 9/11
- Manifesto for All Present and Future Military Personnel
- The Nine Circles of Conspiracy
- Ultimate Truths (Deep Conspiracy)
- Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
- China Syndrome at the WTC
- Dead 9/11 Whistleblowers
- Bogus Official 9/11 Science
- Anonymous Physicist's book site
- 120 Reasons for the No-Plane Theory
- People Who Should Have Seen UA175 Hit the South Tower But Didn't
- 9/11: All Roads Lead to MIHOP
- 9/11: Possible Versus Impossible
- Ghost Gun UA175
- Morgan Reynolds, We Have Holes
- Hunt the Boeing, Shanksville Edition
- Hunt the Boeing, WTC2 Edition
- The No Planes Evidence Kit
- Why Don't More Engineers Question the WTC Collapses?
- Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC
- The Problem with the 9/11 "Truth" Movement
- Brainwashed, In Deep Denial, A Government Shill, Or Some Combination of the Three
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv blog
- International Center for 9/11 Studies - NIST Cumulus Video Database
- 9/11 "U"
- Killtown's Overview Site
- Killtown's 9/11 Smoking Guns
- Killtown's 2nd Hit Video Compilation
- Killtown's NIST figure gallery
- Morgan Reynolds
- The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites
- Ace Baker
- Killtown's Blog
- Genghis' 911 Taboo
- Ningen's Blog
- 9/11 Truthlings Watch
- Judy Wood's 9/11 site (focuses on WTC demolition)
- 9/11 Logic
Interesting and/or Useful 9/11 Sites
Archives
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- March 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- November 2015
- December 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- March 2016
- April 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- August 2016
- September 2016
- October 2016
- November 2016
- December 2016
- January 2017
- February 2017
- March 2017
- April 2017
- May 2017
- June 2017
- July 2017
- August 2017
- September 2017
- October 2017
- November 2017
- December 2017
- January 2018
- February 2018
- March 2018
- April 2018
- May 2018
- June 2018
- July 2018
- August 2018
- September 2018
- October 2018
- November 2018
- December 2018
- January 2019
- February 2019
- March 2019
- April 2019
- May 2019
- June 2019
- July 2019
- August 2019
- September 2019
- October 2019
- November 2019
- December 2019
- January 2020
- February 2020
- March 2020
- April 2020
- May 2020
- June 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- September 2020
- October 2020
- November 2020
- December 2020
- January 2021
- February 2021
- March 2021
- April 2021
- May 2021
- June 2021
- July 2021
- August 2021
- September 2021
- October 2021
- November 2021
- December 2021
- January 2022
- February 2022
- March 2022
- April 2022
- May 2022
- June 2022
- July 2022
- August 2022
- September 2022
- October 2022
- November 2022
- December 2022
- January 2023
- February 2023
- March 2023
- April 2023
- May 2023
- June 2023
- July 2023
- August 2023
- September 2023
- October 2023
- November 2023
- January 2024
- February 2024
- March 2024
- April 2024
- May 2024
- June 2024
- July 2024
- August 2024
- September 2024
- October 2024
- November 2024
- December 2024
- January 2100
My Other Blogs
- WTC Demolition
- WTC China Syndrome
- 33 Watch
- Al-CIA-duh
- Ghost Plane
- Flight 93 Hoax
- Pentagon Hit
- The AIG Scam
- THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
- Bush Administration War Criminals
- Fake Opposition Democrats
Some of My Findings Regarding the Attack on the WTC South Tower
- Summary of Evidence for No Plane at the South Tower
- Clearest Evidence of Conflicting Plane Paths in Two Different 2nd Hit Videos
- Freak Plane
- The Curious Plane in the "Live" Video
- Too Small of a Plane in Both "Live" 2nd Hit Videos
- Mutant Tail Section on UA175
- Evidence of 2nd Hit Video Fakery
- Proof that the engine part at Church and Murray Street is not from UA175, a Boeing 767
- 9/11 Blimp
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
- 9/11 Complicity
- Conspicuous Plot
- Conspiracy Smasher!!!
- 9/11 Cover-Up
- 9/11 Encyclopedia
- 9/11 Exposed
- 9/11 Foreknowledge
- 9/11 Hoax
- 9/11 Oddities
- 9/11 Overview
- 9/11 Oz (Australian)
- 9/11 Plot
- 9/11 Proof
- 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
- 9/11 Resources
- 9/11 Review.org
- 9/11 Review.com
- 9/11 Stealth
- 9/11 Strike
- 9/11 "U"
- 9/11 Verses
- Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson)
- Finnish 9/11 Site
- Finnish 9/11 Site in English
- German Engineers 9/11 site
- Hybrideb's 9/11 site
- Icelandic 9/11 site
- Jane Doe's 9/11 site
- Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
- Portland Indy Media 9/11
- 119 Questions about 9/11
- Let's Roll 9/11
- Nerdcities 9/11
- Patriots Question 9/11
- RINF 9/11 Archive
- The Mysteries of 9/11
- Shunned
- Physics 911
- Plague Puppy's Cafe
- Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
- Question 911
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
- Steven Warran
- Stop the Lie 9/11
- Unanswered Questions
- Questions Questions
- The Web Fairy
- Wing TV
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Citizens' Court
- 9/11 Citizens' Watch
- 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
- 911 Truth.org
- 911 Truth LA.us
- 911 Truth LA.org
- 911 Truth Emergence
- 911 We Know
- 911 Truth Movement Musings
- 9-11 Visibility Project
- 9-11 UK
- 9/11 Family Steering Committee
- NY 9/11 Truth
- San Francisco 9/11 Truth
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Community Currency 9/11
- Summer of Truth
- Proposition 911
- Reopen 911
- Deception Dollars
- Justice for 9/11
- Team 8 Plus
- Flight 93 Hoax
- WTC Demolition
- The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
- 9/11 Photo Analysis
- Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
- Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC
- 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse
- WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
- Flight 77 FOIA site
- Flight 93 Crash.com
- Pentagon Research
- Brad's Pentagon Analysis
- 9/11 chronology (network footage)
- Buddy Buddy
- Pentagon Strike
- 911 Questions
- FKN News
- Rigorous Intuition v2.0
- Wing TV
- Xymphora
- The Bulldog Manifesto
- Center for an Informed America
- George Washington
- Centre for Research on Globalization
- Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
- Daily Two Minutes of Hate
- The Emperor's New Clothes
- Public Action (Carol Valentine)
- Propaganda Matrix
- Daniel Hopsicker
- What Really Happened
- From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
- Arctic Beacon
- Cryptome
- Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News
- Break for News
- Tom Flocco
- Rense
- "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin
- "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin
- 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall
- "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley
- "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson
- "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert
- "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker
- Pig Lipstick
- Weazl's Revenge
- Alex Constantine
- Buzzflash
- The Raw Story
- Democratic Underground
- Progressive Independent
- Think Progress
- Citizens for a Legitimate Government
- Common Dreams
- Consortium News
- Center for Cooperative Research
- Cursor
- Guerrilla News
- Online Journal
- The Memory Hole
- Information Clearing House
- Press Action
- News from Babylon
- Unknown News
- TV News Lies
- After Downing Street
- Eschaton
- Glenn Greenwald (old blog))
- Daily Kos
- Talking Points Memo
- Hullabaloo
- The Brad Blog
- Jesus' General
- The Rude Pundit
- The Poor Man
- Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
- Today in Iraq
- Antiwar.com
- Iraq Coalition Casualties
- Clusterfuck Nation
- Donkey Rising
- Salon
- Slate
- The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas
- The Oil Drum
- Land of Black Gold
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Richard Heinberg
- Grist
- 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
- I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.
20 Comments:
And clearly we can see the POTUS logo on this flag and NO SUCH LOGO CAN BE SEEN on the post- assassination photo.
Furthermore, why don't you dupe this photo, but substitute the man instead of the flag there?
So everyone can see how absurd this is.
Everyone can see the VAST difference between the shape of a flag and the clear shape of a man.
There, you wanted this civilly, there it is.
And I was NOT the one who started with F-bombs and such to other one, or to call the other one "delusional."
But I am happy to stick to the evidence, if you also stop with F-bombs or "delusional" etc.
A.P
Here e.g., is one of the many cropped photos where the PTB felt the need to either crop the man out altogether--or here they felt they better crop out his arm or whatever he held.
http://lisawallerrogers.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kennedy-in-dallas-motorcade-ii.jpg?w=500
Even your own one supporter realizes he has to keep (re-)inventing a non-existent "cross-bar" to explain the arm!
Everyone knows what that is.
As I told you from the outset, for over 30 years they cropped out all or part of the man in most books etc.
Everyone honest can see why.
This cropping was done for a reason in all those books, esp. the first couple of decades.
Just as there is a reason for each frame in the Zapruder film that was either excised or had things painted in.
But as per the above, I would love to see you paste the man in your photo where the flag is.
A.P.
And here is the Zapruder film.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozx4_4DZp38
Note that the last couple of seconds shown corresponds EXACTLY to when the "Flagman" is claimed.
Look closely, you can see--as I wrote--that the flag is straight back along the length of the limo.
(Posting other irrelevant photos is meaningless.)
That man is a man, and not a flag.
We see where the flag is in the Z-film!
Along the length of the limo, which is to the right in the Altgens photo, not to the left--where the man is.
QED
I am not the one who needs a cult to be believed. I have no cult following, nor would I ever want one.
I will rest on the evidence.
A.P.
AP - as you point out, the flag is visible in the Z film at the end of the video clip you referenced.
It is also clear to me that the last second of that referenced clip has the SS agent and Mrs K in very much the same location as shown in your - for want of a better title - "man in the manhole" photo.
If what looks to me to be the presidential standard - including some of the stars from the circle surrounding the eagle - is actually a man in a manhole, then there must be a scientific explanation about:
1) why at least part of the manhole is not visible in the sunlit area behind the lead car (the manhole can not be in the shadow under the car because the position of the sun would make egress from the manhole to a near erect position impossible); and,
2) the absence of the manhole cover from the road surface.
3) what is the optical physics that allows the man in the manhole to be seen but not the presidential standard?
I don't want to know who is right, I just want to know the physics that proves your hypothesis.
http://lisawallerrogers.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kennedy-in-dallas-motorcade-ii.jpg?w=500
Really? Is that the best you have? It's just a tight crop around the limo.
In other situations, I could see people cropping out the flag because just looking at the pic, it looks weird, and distracting, since it is not immediately obvious what it is.
I know, that is exactly what an agent would say, right?
As far as the Z film, you can clearly see the flag waving all over the place! There is certainly no way you can say that the exact moment of the Altgens pic that the flag is perfectly straight back.
And the key question is still: "what is the optical physics that allows the man in the manhole to be seen but not the presidential standard?"
Looking at Jackie's hand positions in the Altgens photo, and where her head is turning back to the front, it looks like about frame 397 of the Z film: http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z397.jpg
Unfortunately, we can't see the flag in that frame. But clearly, the flag is in constant motion during the whole sequence.
One thought is that it would be interesting to see if one could recreate the speed of the limo based on the motion of the flag. But it wouldn't be too useful as the flag is not visible in the Z film during the key shooting sequence.
"And clearly we can see the POTUS logo on this flag and NO SUCH LOGO CAN BE SEEN on the post- assassination photo."
I would guess because either:
a) in the post-assassination photo, that face of the flag is in shade, or
b) there is no logo on that face of the flag.
In the Z film, that face of the flag is fairly dark, so it's hard to tell if there is a logo on it. Certainly, the side of the flag facing the limo would be in shade in that sequence.
"Furthermore, why don't you dupe this photo, but substitute the man instead of the flag there?"
It's totally different angles, and would be tricky to get the size right. I don't even know what that would show.
The key question is still: "what is the optical physics that allows the man in the manhole to be seen but not the presidential standard?"
i think i know what happened - after the photos of the oncoming limo (clearly showing the black flag on the driver's side fender) were taken, mr. sneaky man #1 jumped out of the limo and removed it (flag), just in time for mr. sneaky man #2 with a bazooka, (really dude, a bazooka?) or a rifle, to pop out of a manhole and menace the oncoming limo. this magnificent example of choreography would all have taken place before the photo showing the limo from the rear would have been taken.
oh and it's just a coincidence that mr. sneaky man #2 was wearing a black batman-zorro-dracula cape that just happens to resemble the flag that mr. sneaky man #1 had removed mere moments before.
case closed!
Again mostly disengenuous replies. Really non-replies.
The earlier flag waving in the Z film is completely irrelevant And I knew you would say this nonsense.
Many witnesses said the car was brought to a standstill (And I have written this numerous times [wasted] here, and most experts believe the apparent motion before the final shot is because a dupe of itself is running in the background. I have studied this matter for 26 years now. And read many books and been to Dealey Plaza.
All you have is painting in arrows and in effect declaring an amoeba to be an elephant.
So the flag waving earlier is meaningless. As I told you, at the moment of the Altgens photo, the car was undergoing great acceleration and was traveling with some speed then.
You can see all this from the Nix film, Clint Hill has no trouble approaching the limo (because it was at a [near] standstill), but JFK is murdered just as he gets to it and he has great difficulty getting aboard because of what I just said. It is accelerating rapidly and moving at good speed by the time of the Altgens. And this is why any cross-winds have very little if any sideways effect at that point in time.
And again the last second of the Z-film I posted is at the EXACT moment of the Altgens photo and shows the flag is straight back aligned with the limo!!!!!
QED.
AND THE FLAG IS ALL TO THE RIGHT IN YOUR LAUGHABLE FLAGMAN PHOTO--NOT TO THE LEFT WHERE THE MAN IS.
QED again
Pretty much everything you said above is not worthy.
And everyone I showed it to got a big laugh because it clearly is the shape of a man, and clearly NOT the shape of a flag.
So any honest people reading can see why I was outraged at your disinformation.
And your then insulting me and calling me delusional!!
All the people I showed it to knew who was what.
Indeed my earlier points were never properly answered either.
And indeed, as I said what you claim was the top of the flag, is just a couple of dots.
And it gets worse, what you claimed was the bottom of the flag or pole or braid, is not where the flag is. The flag is further down.
That bottom "piece" (which it isn't) is too far forward, AND APPEARS TO BE IN THE DISTANCE WHERE THE MAN IS.
Furthermore, you have not even proved that the piece where the flag goes into the limo is raised above the body of the limo.
Maybe they drilled holes in the body, and inserted the flags then.
I do not know this for a fact, but the onus is on you to even show that there is a piece raised above the limo's body, and just where it is. You haven't done this, And as per the above, it's all in the wrong place.
All my points and the Z-film showing the flag aligned with the limo at that precise moment all prove your utter absurdity of claiming the man is the flag.
And I am not gonna bother to find all the other photos in all the books where they either crop out the man's arm or the man completely for damn good reason!!
And as I suspected, you will never admit to the truth here! Even though the Z-film at the precise moment totally proves it.
And proves my deeper points.
Anonymousphysicist.com
vindicated once again by the truth
AP - Do you actually read what other people post here as legitimate questions requiring a physics based response?
Or are you so wrapped up in your personal crusade to want to take time to address questions about PHYSICS - you are a PHYSICIST are you not? - let's see some scientific rigor!
I will restate the questions again for your benefit:
1) why is part of the manhole not visible in the sunlit area behind the lead car (the manhole can not be in the shadow under the car because the position of the sun would make [a man's] egress from the manhole to a near erect position impossible); and,
2) why is the manhole cover not visible on the road surface, and most importantly;
3) what is the optical physics that allows the man in the manhole to be seen but not the presidential standard?
Please stick to a physics based answer because your opinions do not constitute a logical and scientific argument.
Remember, I don't want to know who is right, I just want to know the physics that proves your hypothesis.
I see Spooked is getting help from a new diversionary expert. So Langley of them…
He screams "Manhole, Manhole, Manhole."
A tiny side/non-issue because:
I HAVE WELL PROVEN THAT IS NO FLAG.
And not gonna waste any more of my time with a 3rd party disinfo agent.
I answered and proved everything between Spooked and me. This was about my termination with him for cause.
And I guess I proved it so well they needed to bring in SOMEONE CLEARLY NEW HERE.
NOTICE THEY ONLY BROUGHT HIM IN HERE ONLY *AFTER* I CLEARLY WON THE POINT vs Spooked.
Again just when they brought him in now proves my deeper point! Thanks!
About the nature of things here without doubt.
I do not care if some shill is brought in to scream:
“Manhole, manhole, physics physics. Answer, Answer.”
You can import some guy to demand—now that I have won clearly—some creature to “demand the physics” of a flea on a molecule on the MAN with the usually cropped-out arm.
Not gonna get diverted by NEW disinfo agents with bogus issues.
This was between Spooked and me and was about the utter absurdity of a clear figure of a man being called a “flag.”
Only after I won, they import a new creature with more diversions I will not waste any more time on.
I proved what I set out to prove.
And utterly disgusting that instead of MANning up to it, they MOST FOULLY bring in a new shill.
And not manning up to it—which I knew he would never do—they make it even more obvious who and what is going on here.
QED
AP
""3) what is the optical physics that allows the man in the manhole to be seen but not the presidential standard?""
it's simple; the flag was not there anymore at that point. see @5:28 PM above;
mr. sneaky man #1 jumped out of the limo and removed it (flag), just in time for mr. sneaky man #2 with a bazooka or a rifle, to pop out of a manhole.
AP – I don’t really care what you think of me and my reasons for expecting you to be able to develop a cogent argument about manholes and optical physics in support of your own unique hypothesis.
What I see in the photos is obviously not what you see and I think it is perfectly reasonable to expect a physicist to explain how his conclusions were derived or to challenge the basis of those conclusions.
Your own disingenuous response betrays a lack of scientific objectivity about the issue at hand and, contrary to your own belief, proves nothing.
The proponent of the "multiple Mr Sneaky Man” hypothesis has at least addressed the issues raised and has brought some much needed levity to this dour affair and, when he works out that the manhole was removed by a powerful electromagnet under the lead car, his proposition will be nearly complete.
AP--
I am not going to spend any more time on this issue because I think it is idiotic. In the past I have really respected your judgment and opinion, but here you are grossly mistaken and you just seem to be incapable of admitting your mistake.
One little thing I would recommend is that you and your friends who think the object is a man and not a flag, learn something about foreshortening and perspective.
One little experiment you can do-- get a flag, take it outside when there is some wind, then look at it on end (as opposed to from the side). You will see all sort of weird shapes as it flutters about.
I know you think the top part of the flag juts out abnormally, so it must be an man's arm, but it's really a trick of perspective.
If you want to keep saying it's a man and call me an agent and so forth, fine-- but please do it on your blog.
Thanks.
electromagnet, of course! i was thinking that the perps might have used an 'ACME portable hole' such as roger rabbit might have or wiley coyote might employ for capturing that elusive road-runner, but a powerful electro magnet mounted onto the chassis of the lead limo is ever so much more feasible.
by the way, since AP has suggested that Spooked should now be referred to as "Flagman", i submit that AP should henceforth be known as "Manhole".
ACME electromagnet? or...
A portable hole... brilliant.
portable hole-- awesome.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PortableHole
Post a Comment
<< Home