What Is Up with Gene Rosen?
I really have not delved into the Sandy Hook conspiracies at all, except for some very early preliminary stuff. I've seen some dumb videos claiming photoshop of victims-- this is the stuff I always hated from 9/11, vicsim BS. Some other stuff I've seen is inconclusive or badly interpreted.
But this neighbor Gene Rosen is really one odd character, don't know what to make of him. The obvious people thing want to say is that he is an actor, or a paid character. But maybe he was some brainwashed witness?
Stephen Barton is kind of fishy too, given his connection to both Aurora, Sandy Hook and working at the 9/11 memorial.
But this neighbor Gene Rosen is really one odd character, don't know what to make of him. The obvious people thing want to say is that he is an actor, or a paid character. But maybe he was some brainwashed witness?
Stephen Barton is kind of fishy too, given his connection to both Aurora, Sandy Hook and working at the 9/11 memorial.
posted by spooked at 10:15 AM
5 Comments:
"There are good reasons to believe Sandy Hook was a staged event and did not take place as federal, state and local officials have claimed. Had 20 children been shot in their classroom, then swarms of EMTs and ambulances would have been expected on the scene to rush them to hospitals for qualified physicians to determine whether they were dead or alive and treated them. Officially, they were instead left in the classroom and only removed later in darkness and complete secrecy."
Dr. James H. Fetzer
jAMES HOLMES was reported to appear like he was very much "out of it" when he was arrested, calmly standing next to his car outside the theater.
Smoke/stun grenades were thrown into BOTH of the movie theaters and someone was reported being seen holding the fire exit door open, allowing two or three people to enter.
Aurora was not the work of a crazy lone nut.
TV is all about faking stuff anyway. they send some TV teams to some place where something has happened and they have to come up with interesting witness accounts and stuff like that. So they pay some guy 100 bucks to say what they want to hear in front of the camera. That is very convenient and since nobody complains about it, they got used to that over the years. TV is all about enactment and bullshit. The majority doesn't seem to notice so they keep doing it.
There are other things which are fishy about Sandy Hook as well. Was Adam Lanza really the killer? His body was found there so we're supposed to think so. He will never be convicted in front of court, just like Mohammed Atta and all the others, the case is "solved". Some paid killers took out the kids and the teachers quickly, placed Adam Lanzas body in there and leave the place. Need to know theory - the TV stations don't know that, they just come up with the same BS as always and that is just being used as a red herring to draw attention away from the things that are truly interesting. Now the whole thing is awash with the typical conspiracy folklore - anybody doubting the official story will be branded as a kook.
No kids died there. No evidence of any dying there. No crime scene photos. One alleged victim (girl) was photographed posing with Morocco
Bama.
Paid actors, Adam Lanza was RYAN Lanza.
Psy Op.
Do you consider it impossible that there could be fake victims (or "vicsims,") at Sandy Hook?
I don't understand the hostility to this concept. It makes perfect sense to me, and there are indeed some facts that give one serious pause. Like the initial report that Dawn Hochsprung had survived and phoned in a witness account to the Newtown Bee. This was later dismissed as an impostor, although no follow-up has been done. Or the fact that Robbie Parker is laughing as he takes the podium to talk about his dead kid.
And what about the weird "freeze-face" duplicates of Victoria Soto and Dawn Hochsprung? I've always found this to be a particularly strong part of the fake victims case in 9/11, and its resurfacing here.
Post a Comment
<< Home