No Motion Blur-- Simplest Proof of Video Fakery Yet
I think this simple proof captures something we intuitively knew for a long time-- the images of "UA175" were far too crisp for the apparent speed. It has to be animation.
Via this interesting conversation between Alan Weisbecker and Jim Fetzer-- which is mostly about the JFK assassination and talks a lot about Zapruder film fakery. The 9/11 video fakery only comes in during the last 30 minutes.
Fetzer always cracks me up. He's such a smart guy in some ways, but such a doofus in other ways, such as paying far too much credence to 2nd hit witnesses. He admits there was no real plane but wants to hold onto a hologram theory because of the witnesses. Weisbecker makes the good point that the 2nd hit videos are a completely separate issue of what 2nd hit witnesses saw.