The Lincoln Assasination Was Faked
A somewhat long but reasonably convincing case for fakery by Miles Mathis. One thing I like a lot about Mathis is he lays his arguments out very logically and coherently. He doesn't beat around the bush much at all, and at the same time he also does a good job of painting the bigger picture.
Whereas Dave McGowan did a whole series of essays about funny business in the Lincoln assassination, but they really meandered and I couldn't get very interested in them. I read over the last one he published (#11) and he still didn't seem to get to a point.
Whereas Dave McGowan did a whole series of essays about funny business in the Lincoln assassination, but they really meandered and I couldn't get very interested in them. I read over the last one he published (#11) and he still didn't seem to get to a point.
posted by spooked at 1:12 PM
3 Comments:
Check out PC Roberts' references to authors on Lincoln
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/13/power-lies/
Mathis Watergate piece is great too.
PCRoberts claims Lincoln was an "empire man", and that the North refused to let the South secede.
1. What was the "empire" that A.Lincoln was protecting?
2. The South's revolt was illegal - as in ONE nation. The Constitution did not provide for any kind of LEGAL secession.
PCRoberts is not a historian, and should stick to the world of fuzzy predictions aka economics.
Post a Comment
<< Home