9/11-- 20 Years Later

20 years since that horrible event occurred, that led to even more horrible events and just this year, America has finally left Afghanistan, which was invaded shortly after 9/11. 

I have run this blog for over 16 years now, and written hundreds of posts on 9/11. 

In my humble opinion, the September 11th attacks were a horrible false-flag crime perpetrated by an evil cabal in the US govt that was to meant to spur on a set of wars by the US against the oil-rich Middle East. There were probably deeper, more evil and/or conniving reasons, and overlapping aspects of more simple things like insurance fraud and covering up other crimes, like massive financial fraud at the Pentagon, as well as a distraction from the emerging disclosure of the ET presence here on earth.

Sadly, hardly anyone really cares about the truth of 9/11 any more, and I have moved on to more pressing concerns in our body politic. 

Thus, lately I've hardly posted compared to my heyday. I don't think any really new has happened with 9/11 research in the past few years. I wanted to but I didn't really get the time to do the big overview of all my research on 9/11. 

So I will do a "9/11 odds" post, which is based on my research over the years.

It is difficult to be absolutely certain of many aspects of 9/11, at least based on the evidence publicly available. However, it is clear that the official story is very wrong. 

The following are how I rate various aspects of 9/11, in terms of probability ("Beyond any reasonable doubt" = odds of 10,000 to 1 or higher). 

1) Some officials in the US government had specific foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

2) Some officials in the US government aided the hijackers at various points before 9/11: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

3) Some officials in the US government had a direct hand in carrying out the attacks: "100 to 1"

4) Flight AA77 did not crash into the Pentagon: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

5) No aircraft hit the Pentagon at all: 10 to 1

6) Pre-planted explosives had a role in the destruction of the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

7) Miniature nuclear weapons were involved in the destruction of the WTC (1, 2, 7) towers: "10 to 1"

8) UA93 did not crash in Shanksville: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

9) No plane crashed at all in Shanksville and the crash site was a complete hoax: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

10) Flight AA 11 did not hit WTC1: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

11) Flight UA 175 did not hit WTC2: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

12) At least some videos and photos of the second hit were faked: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

13) Bush had some specific foreknowledge about what was going to happen on 9/11: 10 to 1

14) The air defense (NORAD) response to the hijackings was distracted and/or disabled by wargames being run on 9/11: "100 to 1"

15) The four 9/11 "crashes" did not involve any conventional planes (though real plane parts were used to mimic crashes, and that planes were used indirectly as decoys): "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

16) There is a cover-up/disinfo campaign about 9/11 being maintained by the government: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

17) There is a cover-up about 9/11 being maintained at high levels by the media: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

18) 9/11 involved some strange alternate reality, and/or supernatural force: "possible" 

Also see my 9/11 overview page.

Thanks for reading and visiting.