Flight 93 Crash Site
Like the other crash sites of 9/11, the flight 93 crash site is strange. Basically the plane is supposed to have disappeared into a hole in the ground. That video linked above and this collection of videos show absolutely no sign of a plane-- no debris, NOTHING.
Really really odd.
It's quite amazing how all of the 9/11 planes just seem to MELT into whatever they impact-- WTC exterior, Pentagon wall or the ground. Did any one of the 9/11 planes produce any significant debris?
Take a look at the photos of airplane crashes at this site. Every crash whose photo I looked at produces recognizable airplane wreckage.
Why were the plane crashes on 9/11 so different?
Because they were piloted by terrorists?
I understand there may be logical explanations for why the plane crashes on 9/11 looked and turned out the way they did, but still it is odd-- particularly flight 93. How does a complete plane disappear into the ground?
Even if the plane was going straight down at a 90 degree angle, does this explain how the whole airplane can go deep into the ground? Almost 200 feet of plane? In contrast, if the plane telescoped, then one would expect to see some plane sticking out. You can't have a telescoping and deep burrowing action at the same time. It reminds me of how the WTC south tower exploded-- both the top and bottom sections above the crease started disintegrating at the same time. It doesn't make sense.
But if flight 93 DIDN'T go into that hole, where did it go?
I really don't know. But certainly the crater of the crash site could have been produced just by explosives. The plane could have ended up somewhere very differently. The big question is if anyone besides the FBI saw the plane engine that was supposed to have come off flight 93 and was found in the woods.
Really really odd.
It's quite amazing how all of the 9/11 planes just seem to MELT into whatever they impact-- WTC exterior, Pentagon wall or the ground. Did any one of the 9/11 planes produce any significant debris?
Take a look at the photos of airplane crashes at this site. Every crash whose photo I looked at produces recognizable airplane wreckage.
Why were the plane crashes on 9/11 so different?
Because they were piloted by terrorists?
I understand there may be logical explanations for why the plane crashes on 9/11 looked and turned out the way they did, but still it is odd-- particularly flight 93. How does a complete plane disappear into the ground?
Even if the plane was going straight down at a 90 degree angle, does this explain how the whole airplane can go deep into the ground? Almost 200 feet of plane? In contrast, if the plane telescoped, then one would expect to see some plane sticking out. You can't have a telescoping and deep burrowing action at the same time. It reminds me of how the WTC south tower exploded-- both the top and bottom sections above the crease started disintegrating at the same time. It doesn't make sense.
But if flight 93 DIDN'T go into that hole, where did it go?
I really don't know. But certainly the crater of the crash site could have been produced just by explosives. The plane could have ended up somewhere very differently. The big question is if anyone besides the FBI saw the plane engine that was supposed to have come off flight 93 and was found in the woods.
posted by spooked at 8:05 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home