Pod People and Plane Bombs
After examining more 9/11 sites, in particular this amics21 site, I must say I have a little more respect for the "pod" theory. There was definitely something strange under the wing of "flight 175". The Amics21 site also seems to show fairly convincingly that the plane that hit the South WTC tower was not really United 175. Basically it has to do with the length of the plane and whether it is a Boeing 757-300 or a 757-200. Their analysis seems sound. So if you can handle that the South-tower-hitting-plane was not United 175, then it is not too hard of a stretch to think that this plane could be a modified Boeing 300 with a bulging "pod" structure underneath which could have been a bomb or missile.
This evidence really points in the direction of a large-scale government conspiracy, but I don't see anyway around it. And really only the military could do something like this.
The one thing the not-Flight 175 evidence seems to support is the idea that something besides Flight77 hit the Pentagon. Thus, it seems quite possible that both "flight 175" and "flight 77" were mock-ups of civilian aircraft, but in fact were plane-bombs armed with missiles. Thus, in an odd way, the weirdness of flight 175 helps explain the weirdness of the Pentagon hit.
I know this may sound far-fetched, but it really seems to be the way the data are pointing. At this point I am thinking the whole hijacker story is just a ruse-- a giant red-herring. This would explain a lot .
This evidence really points in the direction of a large-scale government conspiracy, but I don't see anyway around it. And really only the military could do something like this.
The one thing the not-Flight 175 evidence seems to support is the idea that something besides Flight77 hit the Pentagon. Thus, it seems quite possible that both "flight 175" and "flight 77" were mock-ups of civilian aircraft, but in fact were plane-bombs armed with missiles. Thus, in an odd way, the weirdness of flight 175 helps explain the weirdness of the Pentagon hit.
I know this may sound far-fetched, but it really seems to be the way the data are pointing. At this point I am thinking the whole hijacker story is just a ruse-- a giant red-herring. This would explain a lot .
posted by spooked at 10:32 PM
3 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
There are is plenty of evidence--video recordings and photographs--that clearly show a Boeing 767 crashing into WTC 2 on 9/11. The plane in the Naudet brothers' WTC 1 impact video is not identifiable as a 767 because of its small size in the frame. On the other hand, there is no solid evidence, such as a video, photo, or small plane debris, that establishes the presence of a small plane or any other object besides a 767 hitting the WTC.
From my website, http://nyctohylophobia.blogspot.com or http://nyctohylophobia.blog-city.com:
Rebuttals to WTC No-Plane/Pod Theories
"No airplanes were found at WTC 1 and WTC 2. No engines were found at ground zero. The black boxes have not been released."
[Whatever was left of the planes--even the supposedly indestructible black boxes--after the crashes was likely turned to dust by the anomalous collapse of the towers.]
"The Twin Towers were hit by missiles that projected holograms."
[Missiles would not leave a hole the shape and size of a Boeing 767.]
"There was an anomalous pod on the belly of Flight 175 N612UA."
[I still haven't seen one high quality photo that documents the claims of an anomalous pod under the plane that hit the second tower. Half-way decent resolution photos merely show the structure that holds the wings together (under the body of the plane).]
The "amics21" site fits in the category of "fun with photoshop."
It is blatant disinformation.
see http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html for a good rebuttal.
There is ZERO evidence that Flight 175 didn't hit the South Tower. None.
Perhaps one day someone will find some real evidence for this, but it is probably a form of distracting the skeptics with silly claims that are baseless.
The only weirdness of the Pentagon hit is (1) why so many 9/11 skeptics have fallen for the fake claim that a plane didn't hit the building and (2) what guidance system was used to ensure the plane hit the nearly empty part of the Pentagon.
Post a Comment
<< Home