9/11 was the Result of a Highjacking Exercise Run by the Military Gone Wrong
THIS IS NOT A "CONSPIRACY THEORY"-- THIS IS FACT.
It's been in front of our faces for a long-time, published in the mainstream media. The problem is that the media just never wanted to put the pieces together. Thankfully Mike Ruppert did. (I'm sure others have put it together as well, but Ruppert is my source for the purposes of this post)
This information is in "Crossing the Rubicon" by Mike Ruppert-- he has uncovered the truth about 9/11. The key is in Chapter 19, which has been released in PDF form, you can download at: http://www.newsociety.com/News/rub_war.pdf.
I had to read chapter 19 twice before it finally sunk in completely.
On 9/11, there was a LIVE-FLY HIJACKING EXERCISE known as "Vigilant Guardian" run by NORAD.
This exercise used CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT posing as hijacked airplanes. Additionally, the exercise involved "injecting" electronic blips representing other hijacked aircraft into air traffic control and NORAD radar. Thus, the real hijacked aircraft were HARD TO FIND.
The American and United pilots were most likely involved in the drill. The pilots of the 9/11 planes were all Vietnam veterans, and we know that the pilot of flight 77 used to work at the Pentagon had previously participated in such exercises.
HERE'S THE CLINCHER:
On April 18th, 2004, USA Today ran a story titled "NORAD had drills of jets as weapons". In the story, it explains that BEFORE 9/11/2001, NORAD conducted exercises simulating hijacked airliners crashing into the World Trade Center as well as the Pentagon. CNN reported a similar story right after this one broke.
What happened on 9/11/2001 is now clear. Our government was running a wargame simulating highjacked planes crashing into buildings. The mock hijacked planes in the exercise were piloted by remote control, and had pre-set targets of the WTC towers and the Pentagon, and probably another target in Washington DC (flight 93 was shot down before it could reach its target). Someone, possibly maliciously, injected too many false targets into the radar, therefore completely confusing the FAA and NORAD. This is why Jane Garvey of the FAA said that she thought there were as many as 11 highjacked aircraft on 9/11.
A military "screw-up" explains many of the strange things about 9/11:
1) the confused and conflicted explanations provided by the administration. Condi Rice was lying blatantly when she said no-one could imagine hijackers using airplanes as missiles and crashing them into buildings. It was a giant lie concocted as part of a massive cover-up.
2) the fact that the administration clearly didn't want 9/11 investigated.
3) that four commercial airplanes were taken over by knife- and boxcutter-wielding hijackers without the pilots ever alerting air traffic control of hijackings (This is a hard fact and has always raised my suspicions).
4) the obvious cover-up by the FBI and the too-convenient planting of evidence such as Korans and flight manuals in the hijackers' cars and hijackers passports found on the street near the WTC.
What does this all mean?
The Al Qaeda-linked hijackers were merely patsies supplied by the CIA.
The "war on terror" is completely bogus.
Someone in the government may have facilitated the fatal errors on 9/11 as part of a giant scheme to mobilize the US into a war-footing, and to provide a pretext for the invasion of Iraq.
This is the greatest crime our country has ever witnessed, and we can't let the government get away with it.
Please disseminate this information as widely as you can!!!
POSTSCRIPT-- I didn't explicitly spell this out, but I think the highjacking exercise VIGILANT GUARDIAN was the operational cover for malicious people (Ruppert believes it was Cheney, and this seems possible along with some of the neocons) who had planned for 9/11 to be a major "terror attack". They likely had this planned for some time, if for no other reason then it took a few years to set up the highjacker legend. No doubt, on 9/11, some people in the goverment KNEW the exercise would go wrong.
It's been in front of our faces for a long-time, published in the mainstream media. The problem is that the media just never wanted to put the pieces together. Thankfully Mike Ruppert did. (I'm sure others have put it together as well, but Ruppert is my source for the purposes of this post)
This information is in "Crossing the Rubicon" by Mike Ruppert-- he has uncovered the truth about 9/11. The key is in Chapter 19, which has been released in PDF form, you can download at: http://www.newsociety.com/News/rub_war.pdf.
I had to read chapter 19 twice before it finally sunk in completely.
On 9/11, there was a LIVE-FLY HIJACKING EXERCISE known as "Vigilant Guardian" run by NORAD.
This exercise used CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT posing as hijacked airplanes. Additionally, the exercise involved "injecting" electronic blips representing other hijacked aircraft into air traffic control and NORAD radar. Thus, the real hijacked aircraft were HARD TO FIND.
The American and United pilots were most likely involved in the drill. The pilots of the 9/11 planes were all Vietnam veterans, and we know that the pilot of flight 77 used to work at the Pentagon had previously participated in such exercises.
HERE'S THE CLINCHER:
On April 18th, 2004, USA Today ran a story titled "NORAD had drills of jets as weapons". In the story, it explains that BEFORE 9/11/2001, NORAD conducted exercises simulating hijacked airliners crashing into the World Trade Center as well as the Pentagon. CNN reported a similar story right after this one broke.
What happened on 9/11/2001 is now clear. Our government was running a wargame simulating highjacked planes crashing into buildings. The mock hijacked planes in the exercise were piloted by remote control, and had pre-set targets of the WTC towers and the Pentagon, and probably another target in Washington DC (flight 93 was shot down before it could reach its target). Someone, possibly maliciously, injected too many false targets into the radar, therefore completely confusing the FAA and NORAD. This is why Jane Garvey of the FAA said that she thought there were as many as 11 highjacked aircraft on 9/11.
A military "screw-up" explains many of the strange things about 9/11:
1) the confused and conflicted explanations provided by the administration. Condi Rice was lying blatantly when she said no-one could imagine hijackers using airplanes as missiles and crashing them into buildings. It was a giant lie concocted as part of a massive cover-up.
2) the fact that the administration clearly didn't want 9/11 investigated.
3) that four commercial airplanes were taken over by knife- and boxcutter-wielding hijackers without the pilots ever alerting air traffic control of hijackings (This is a hard fact and has always raised my suspicions).
4) the obvious cover-up by the FBI and the too-convenient planting of evidence such as Korans and flight manuals in the hijackers' cars and hijackers passports found on the street near the WTC.
What does this all mean?
The Al Qaeda-linked hijackers were merely patsies supplied by the CIA.
The "war on terror" is completely bogus.
Someone in the government may have facilitated the fatal errors on 9/11 as part of a giant scheme to mobilize the US into a war-footing, and to provide a pretext for the invasion of Iraq.
This is the greatest crime our country has ever witnessed, and we can't let the government get away with it.
Please disseminate this information as widely as you can!!!
POSTSCRIPT-- I didn't explicitly spell this out, but I think the highjacking exercise VIGILANT GUARDIAN was the operational cover for malicious people (Ruppert believes it was Cheney, and this seems possible along with some of the neocons) who had planned for 9/11 to be a major "terror attack". They likely had this planned for some time, if for no other reason then it took a few years to set up the highjacker legend. No doubt, on 9/11, some people in the goverment KNEW the exercise would go wrong.
posted by spooked at 9:24 AM
4 Comments:
Thanks Ductape.
I was actually going easy on the "conspiracy" angle in order to sell this to people who don't like to believe in conspiracies.
Like you, I also think 9/11 was planned for some time, and that the military exercise was the vehicle for the plan.
But I figured if you could get people to think it was a normal military operation that went awry, then they might latch onto it a little better.
Ductape--what are the "colonialist" boards? Which sites are these?
i hadnt read crossing the rubicon yet, but i arrived to similar conclusions. This is why the flight maps were out of sync with the transcripts and media reports.
Most of the media reports looked like they were either being made up on the spot, or scripted. (bomb at the state dept, plane crashing at camp david)
In addition there was something i found that was quite weird. i looked through the BTS database
(flight records) from 911
and backtracked the 911 planes the day before sept11th
and 591UA (flight 93) was in 2 places at once. The tail number is usually recorded from ACARS data by the airlines. so, it seems to me, someone had control of the ACARS data on sept 10th. IMHO it wasnt 591UA that was flight 93. it was a substitute plane.
(great article)
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/print.php?storyid=901
more here..
http://publish.portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/300588.shtml
Now, on sept 11th early, before any 911 events started, the planes that were landing did NOT record data (usually the arrival times and tail# of the plane is recorded) theres no reason that this data shouldnt be there www.bts.gov for the info.
http://sept10-01.brad.com
the only reason i can figure is that someone had control of ALL flight computer systems, and could change anything they wanted to. ARINC, who has close ties to the DOD could do this.With the war games going on that day, its a perfect cover, just have 3-4 people on the inside. If others found out, they wouldnt want it public, it would look bad, so they cover it up.
(the perps were a small group, but i imagine someone in the DOD , FAA, CIA had to know)
the flight maps hold a key as well, news reports say that the plane filed a new flight plan at 9:35 before it was hijacked. BUT, the guy who made all the maps we saw for the media, said that it filed a new flight plan at 10:00, well after it was hijacked.
http://airgames.bravehost.com/
(look at all flights 11,77,93,175) the maps dont coincide to what we were told.
Also, VERY interesting to me, is that flight 175 changed its transponder code twice. We were told they turned off the transponders so ATC couldnt track the flights. why would they turn them back on, to a different frequency at that? Twice?
also this guy supposedly had flew on this plane on apr 2003
http://friedmanfamily.org/ua2003/
search for 591. now, maybe this is a typo, but he includes the nose number. 5941 , and the other planes he flew had different nose numbers that the original tail number (they can be changed) so, its doubtfull that he just looked it up and cross-referenced it!
here are some audio snips from 911...
http://thewebfairy.com/911/video/brad/
just stumbled accross your site, hope this helps,
Brad
www.911.brad.com
This looks pretty cool, Comfort on patrol..what a concept and this is an awesome thing to have in my cruiser for that quick cool down.
chiefsupply.com/search/police%20supply.aspx
Post a Comment
<< Home