The Mysteries of Flight 93
Are summed up pretty well in this DU post by John Doe II, and the links therein.
The major problem with the official account is that there are a LOT of debris that show up a two to three miles east of where the plane crashed, and these are not just pieces of paper. They found clothing, books, pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and what appeared to be human remains. These things are a little heavy to be blown miles by the wind.
But if you still think the wind might have blown these things from the crash site, a video taken shortly after the crash shows a wind blowing to the south. Additionally, much debris from the plane crash was found in the woods WEST of the impact crater. You can't have a wind blowing all these different directions.
The other major issue is there were a suspiciously large number of planes flying over that area that morning, including some witnesses who saw what looked like flight 93 heading west (as opposed to another set of witnesses who saw the plane going southwest).
How all these things can be reconciled is not clear without stipulating more than one plane acting like flight 93. Thus, one plane was going west spewing debris over Indian Lake, and one plane was flying Southwest extremely erratically (which consistent with the hijacker pilot behaviour described by the 9/11 Commission Report). It's not clear which plane created the crater.
Either way, the official explanation of flight 93 is dead wrong.
The major problem with the official account is that there are a LOT of debris that show up a two to three miles east of where the plane crashed, and these are not just pieces of paper. They found clothing, books, pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and what appeared to be human remains. These things are a little heavy to be blown miles by the wind.
But if you still think the wind might have blown these things from the crash site, a video taken shortly after the crash shows a wind blowing to the south. Additionally, much debris from the plane crash was found in the woods WEST of the impact crater. You can't have a wind blowing all these different directions.
The other major issue is there were a suspiciously large number of planes flying over that area that morning, including some witnesses who saw what looked like flight 93 heading west (as opposed to another set of witnesses who saw the plane going southwest).
How all these things can be reconciled is not clear without stipulating more than one plane acting like flight 93. Thus, one plane was going west spewing debris over Indian Lake, and one plane was flying Southwest extremely erratically (which consistent with the hijacker pilot behaviour described by the 9/11 Commission Report). It's not clear which plane created the crater.
Either way, the official explanation of flight 93 is dead wrong.
posted by spooked at 3:18 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home