Even More on Flight 175
Two thoughts here.
First, looking over all the clips and photos of flight 175, the "pod" is only really noticeable on two videos-- the "CNN best shot video" and the Evan Fairbanks video. Interestingly, the pod is only strongly visible as the plane gets very close to the tower. This may be why the pod is only clear in these videos, because they have the best shots of the plane as it approaches the tower. But even more interesting is that in the CNN video, the pod really becomes more pronounced as the plane gets nearer and nearer the tower. One might even think the pod was actually some strange distortion of the wing root that is occurring from the high speed and the angle of the plane. If the wing root was becoming distorted however, you might think that the wings would be more prone to breaking as they hit the wall of the tower. But the wings go into the wall like hot knives through butter. It is the damndest thing. So I really really don't know what to make of this, and as I posted earlier-- I would write the pod off as a trick of the light if it weren't for the fact that the pod leaves it's own special imprint as the the plane enters the wall. So, whatever it is, the pod is a real, solid obejct.
Second, there is another point that needs to be emphasized. As I said, and as you can watch here, the wings go into the wall like hot knives through butter. But the angle of the plane means the wings are spanning at least four different floors, each with a thick concrete base. So not only do the wings slice through the steel exterior columns, but they also slice completely through concrete floors-- even the very tips of the wings! This makes no sense, whatsoever.
Thus, there are four very clear abnormalities with the "flight 175" plane:
1) a port wing abnormality (as shown in the Ghost Gun article) where the wing trails much too far back.
2) the large bulge on the belly (or the pod) that develops as the plane moves closer to the tower.
3) the wings that do not bend or break the slightest upon hitting the steel-framed tower wall, even though the starboard wing spans several concrete-slabbed stories.
4) the flash that appears in a few videos as the plane touches the tower wall (this flash also appears in the video of "flight 11" hitting the North tower).
I have no idea what this all means, but it is very suspicious.
I doubt that a normal 767 would show these abnormalities-- even if it was being piloted at top speed by a terrorist hijacker.
First, looking over all the clips and photos of flight 175, the "pod" is only really noticeable on two videos-- the "CNN best shot video" and the Evan Fairbanks video. Interestingly, the pod is only strongly visible as the plane gets very close to the tower. This may be why the pod is only clear in these videos, because they have the best shots of the plane as it approaches the tower. But even more interesting is that in the CNN video, the pod really becomes more pronounced as the plane gets nearer and nearer the tower. One might even think the pod was actually some strange distortion of the wing root that is occurring from the high speed and the angle of the plane. If the wing root was becoming distorted however, you might think that the wings would be more prone to breaking as they hit the wall of the tower. But the wings go into the wall like hot knives through butter. It is the damndest thing. So I really really don't know what to make of this, and as I posted earlier-- I would write the pod off as a trick of the light if it weren't for the fact that the pod leaves it's own special imprint as the the plane enters the wall. So, whatever it is, the pod is a real, solid obejct.
Second, there is another point that needs to be emphasized. As I said, and as you can watch here, the wings go into the wall like hot knives through butter. But the angle of the plane means the wings are spanning at least four different floors, each with a thick concrete base. So not only do the wings slice through the steel exterior columns, but they also slice completely through concrete floors-- even the very tips of the wings! This makes no sense, whatsoever.
Thus, there are four very clear abnormalities with the "flight 175" plane:
1) a port wing abnormality (as shown in the Ghost Gun article) where the wing trails much too far back.
2) the large bulge on the belly (or the pod) that develops as the plane moves closer to the tower.
3) the wings that do not bend or break the slightest upon hitting the steel-framed tower wall, even though the starboard wing spans several concrete-slabbed stories.
4) the flash that appears in a few videos as the plane touches the tower wall (this flash also appears in the video of "flight 11" hitting the North tower).
I have no idea what this all means, but it is very suspicious.
I doubt that a normal 767 would show these abnormalities-- even if it was being piloted at top speed by a terrorist hijacker.
posted by spooked at 10:44 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home