More on the "Ghost Gun" Article

See the previous post to see what I am referring to.

This "Ghost Gun" idea has stuck in my head because the findings are so weird but I think they are onto something important.

The major drawback of the whole piece is that they rely too much on a computer animation of what flight 175 (a United 767-200) should look like. The computer model is extremely realistic and may well accurately depict a 767-200-- but it is hard to have complete confidence that the computer model is accurate in every way.

In any case, here is a list of the various abnormalities they point out in various pictures and photos of flight 175 that are independent of how good the computer model is:
1) strange dark lighting on the plane in some shots
2) strange lack of color on the plane in other shots-- the dark blue UA livery should be very prominent but it just isn't there
3) one wing or one tail disappearing for a few frames in many different videos
4) the "pod" under the left wing
5) the orange flash that appears just as the plane meets the tower
6) the lack of detail on the wings in some shots that have other good detail
7) how the plane looks different from video to video-- each shot angle shows different abnormalities
8) the extreme bending of the port wing (partially dependent on the computer model but has been noticed previously by other investigators without use of the model)
9) a huge upper wing root distention in one shot
10) how the plane melts easily into the building without plane slowing or any part breaking off.

These are all serious problems, and together strongly suggest to me that several of the videos and photos were touched up or faked. The theory that what is observed of flight 175 is a hologram of a 767 cloaking another flying object can't be proven but does help explain things like the pod and the orange flash and some of the other aberrations.

Side point: I posted yesterday how few candidate suspects there were for the crimes of 9/11. The "Ghost Gun" writers name their own suspects: "Larry Silverstein, his financial backers from the Blackstone Group Pete Petersen, Maurice Hank Greenberg and Henry Kissinger. Their blatant and egregious 9-11 WTC insurance fraud is subject to a citizen’s criminal complaint, including my own, and is before New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer."

Certainly, those guys would be in on it, but I doubt they were the planners.

Interestingly, in any case, Maurice Greenberg is currently in the news and is in an insurance fraud case with Spitzer. However, the case has nothing to do with 9/11, which is really not too surprising, but one wonders if 9/11 had something to do with Spitzer pursuing the case.