May 08, 2005
Captured Al-Qaeda kingpin is case of ‘mistaken identity’
Christina Lamb and Mohammad Shehzad Islamabad
THE capture of a supposed Al-Qaeda kingpin by Pakistani agents last week was hailed by President George W Bush as “a critical victory in the war on terror”. According to European intelligence experts, however, Abu Faraj al-Libbi was not the terrorists’ third in command, as claimed, but a middle-ranker derided by one source as “among the flotsam and jetsam” of the organisation.
Al-Libbi’s arrest in Pakistan, announced last Wednesday, was described in the United States as “a major breakthrough” in the hunt for Osama Bin Laden.
Bush called him a “top general” and “a major facilitator and chief planner for the Al- Qaeda network”. Condoleezza Rice, secretary of state, said he was “a very important figure”. Yet the backslapping in Washington and Islamabad has astonished European terrorism experts, who point out that the Libyan was neither on the FBI’s most wanted list, nor on that of the State Department “rewards for justice” programme.
Another Libyan is on the FBI list — Anas al-Liby, who is wanted over the 1998 East African embassy bombings — and some believe the Americans may have initially confused the two. When The Sunday Times contacted a senior FBI counter-terrorism official for information about the importance of the detained man, he sent material on al-Liby, the wrong man.
“Al-Libbi is just a ‘middle-level’ leader,” said Jean-Charles Brisard, a French intelligence investigator and leading expert on terrorism finance. “Pakistan and US authorities have completely overestimated his role and importance. He was never more than a regional facilitator between Al-Qaeda and local Pakistani Islamic groups.”
What a joke. As Buzzflash says: "As Predicted, Arrest of Alleged Al-Qaida Mastermind was Just Another Propaganda Ploy, This Time to Help Tony Blair Get Over His "Little Election Bump""
3 Comments:
Tripe!
Terrorism was not a factor in the UK election. It wasn't talked about. No-one voted for Labour to feel "safe"... the UK isn't remotely like the US.
Our election issues were: the Iraq war and public services. No terrorism, no threats, no fear-mongering.
Okay-- thanks for that. Actually, I didn't think the terrorism issue was a big deal in Britain, but the timing of the announcement seemed to coincide with Blair's election nicely.
I guess Bush still needs help from every terrorist annoucement they can get their hands on.
--Spooked
post with your name next time Craig. ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home