Yet More Evidence That The Official Pentagon Story Is BS

I thought the Pentagon "exit hole" was weird, but the story of the electrical generator in front of the impact site is just as strange if not more so.

The view held by people who believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon is that the plane's starboard engine hit the generator trailer as the plane was coming in just a few feet off the ground. This version says that the engine smashed the top front left of the generator and that a outer flap track fairing on the wing made a deep gouge on the right-hand side top of the generator.

This view is probably best explained by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins, at his site here. He probably gives the most detail explaining how a 757 could produce the damage pattern observed in front of the Pentagon and how the engines impacted various objects in the approach path.

But if you look at this picture here, the idea that the engine just took out the top of the generator is not so easy to accept.

As you can see, several things happened with this generator:
1) There is a large hole in the fence, right at ground level, and two fence poles are knocked inwards, flattened on the ground. The hole in the fence is about the size of a 757 engine.
2) The top left hand side of the generator is crushed. The impact was severe enough to start a fire-- and in fact, this is where much of the smoke comes from in several pictures of the Pentagon impact.
3) The generator was apparently pushed AWAY from the path of the engine, because the posiiton of the generator is not in line with the engine's official path, plus this overhead shot shows a previous orientation of the trailer.
4) A deep gouge was made in the top of the generator, possibly by the outer flap track fairing.

The problem is: NONE OF THIS MAKES ANY SENSE!!!

1) How can the fence be crushed in right at ground level, but only the top of the generator be smashed?

2) How can the engine of a plane impact this generator severely and not dramatically alter the plane's course or at minimum knock off the engine?

3) As Killtown explains (scroll down), the bottom of a 757 engine (which is what supposedly hit the generator) is several feet below the wing track fairing. A 757 wing and engine could not have produced the damage pattern on the generator.

4) How could the engine push the generator away but still make the gouge in the top? If the engine was pushing the generator away as it was impacting, wouldn't the gouge be crooked instead of a straight line? This really doesn't make sense.

5) The smashed in top of the generator isn't in the shape of a 757 engine-- it is not round.

From this evidence, I have to conclude the following:

1) A 757 engine and wing track fairing did not produce the damage on the generator. It must have been another type of plane, with a different engine configuration.

2) There must have been SOMETHING ELSE that flew in behind the plane and knocked the fence in and pushed the generator away from the approach path.

Could there have been two planes that went in? Or a non-757 plane followed by a missile?

This latter idea might explain some things, like why the security camera video is severely edited and a missile might explain the exit hole. But this isn't entirely satisfying either.

I welcome any suggestions.

Thanks!