The Videos of the Second Hit Were Faked
There simply is NO DOUBT anymore. There are too many discrepencies at too many different angles.
So what does this tell us about what we all saw on TV?
I don't know about you, but this massive fraud makes me angry.
So what does this tell us about what we all saw on TV?
I don't know about you, but this massive fraud makes me angry.
posted by spooked at 10:17 AM
3 Comments:
That Photoshop comparasion site is AMAZING & eye-opening!
http://photoshop911.batcave.net/
This CLEARLY shows - due to the fact "Flight 175" is ALL OVER THE PLACE IN THE SKY in overlapping images of different videos! - the second hit videos ARE ALL CLEARLY FAKES.
Why did they need to fake the pictures? i.e. were any of them real?
@ janedoe
...fake video was needed because UA Flight 175 (N612UA) NEVER CRASHED INTO WTC #2!
it was still REGISTERED AS VALID, and flying around...MORE THAN 4 YEARS AFTER 9/11!
See for yourself:
Go to the FAA aircraft registry
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm
and do an "n number" search for N591UA ( UA 93 on Sept 11) and N612UA (UA
175 on Sept 11).*
*nod to Rosalee! ;-)
p.s.
btw, AA 11 & 77 DIDN'T EXIST!
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html
Post a Comment
<< Home