Still Doesn't make Sense!
I still don't truly understand the second hit on the WTC. The evidence simply doesn't fit together and make sense to me.
I can say the official 9/11 story is DEAD.
But the question is, was there a real plane or not???
On the side of a real plane hitting the south tower:
1) about 20 videos of the plane hitting the building from different angles and distances
2) a fair amount of eyewitnesses
3) large-scale damage to the building including a huge (putative jet fuel) fireball
4) a plane-shaped hole in the entry face
5) some apparent plane parts that apparently came out the other side
6) flight 175 seemed to have existed (in contrast to flight 11)
7) supposedly DNA was found in the rubble matching some flight 175 passengers
But there are MAJOR conflicts with the real plane scenario:
1) different videos show conflicting plane paths, conflicting timing with the explosion, conflicting plane speeds, and subtly conflicting entry sites
2) the plane enters without slowing, distorting or exploding-- looks unreal*
3) the plane looks distorted in many shots (the POD, port-wing anomaly, other anomalies)
4) the plane-shaped hole, suggesting the plane was indestructible, and subsequent disintegration of the plane defies physics*
5) the interior explosion doesn't make complete sense-- the plane hit only slightly off-center, yet all explosion was on one side of the building.
6) the speed of the plane (500-600 mph) was too fast for precise control by an amateur pilot, and the speed was also at the operational limits for a real plane
7) the plane wings should have broken off and exploded UPON IMPACTING the large steel outer columns and cement slabs of the WTC; the wings should NOT have sliced into the building and disappeared*
8) neither of the two black boxes from flight 175 were found in rubble of ground zero (officially)
THESE CONFLICTS RULE OUT FLIGHT 175 OR A REAL BOEING 767 HITTING THE SOUTH TOWER.
What exactly happened to the tower, how many so videos could have been faked, how come so many people seem to have seen a plane, is a fascinating question and is still a subject of ongoing research.
NONETHELESS, THE OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY CANNOT BE TRUE.
*think of it this way--imagine the STEEL COLUMNS AND CEMENT FLOORS SLABS OF THE WTC GOING 500 mph then SLAMMING straight on into the nose of a Boeing 767 fixed stably on top of a large strong pole. Physically, this is the virtually the same as a Boeing 767 going 500 mph slamming into a stationary WTC.
Now, is the plane going to punch through the wall and leave its shape in the WTC wall? Or is the plane going to be CRUSHED?
Does anyone REALLY think the former????
I can say the official 9/11 story is DEAD.
But the question is, was there a real plane or not???
On the side of a real plane hitting the south tower:
1) about 20 videos of the plane hitting the building from different angles and distances
2) a fair amount of eyewitnesses
3) large-scale damage to the building including a huge (putative jet fuel) fireball
4) a plane-shaped hole in the entry face
5) some apparent plane parts that apparently came out the other side
6) flight 175 seemed to have existed (in contrast to flight 11)
7) supposedly DNA was found in the rubble matching some flight 175 passengers
But there are MAJOR conflicts with the real plane scenario:
1) different videos show conflicting plane paths, conflicting timing with the explosion, conflicting plane speeds, and subtly conflicting entry sites
2) the plane enters without slowing, distorting or exploding-- looks unreal*
3) the plane looks distorted in many shots (the POD, port-wing anomaly, other anomalies)
4) the plane-shaped hole, suggesting the plane was indestructible, and subsequent disintegration of the plane defies physics*
5) the interior explosion doesn't make complete sense-- the plane hit only slightly off-center, yet all explosion was on one side of the building.
6) the speed of the plane (500-600 mph) was too fast for precise control by an amateur pilot, and the speed was also at the operational limits for a real plane
7) the plane wings should have broken off and exploded UPON IMPACTING the large steel outer columns and cement slabs of the WTC; the wings should NOT have sliced into the building and disappeared*
8) neither of the two black boxes from flight 175 were found in rubble of ground zero (officially)
THESE CONFLICTS RULE OUT FLIGHT 175 OR A REAL BOEING 767 HITTING THE SOUTH TOWER.
What exactly happened to the tower, how many so videos could have been faked, how come so many people seem to have seen a plane, is a fascinating question and is still a subject of ongoing research.
NONETHELESS, THE OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY CANNOT BE TRUE.
*think of it this way--imagine the STEEL COLUMNS AND CEMENT FLOORS SLABS OF THE WTC GOING 500 mph then SLAMMING straight on into the nose of a Boeing 767 fixed stably on top of a large strong pole. Physically, this is the virtually the same as a Boeing 767 going 500 mph slamming into a stationary WTC.
Now, is the plane going to punch through the wall and leave its shape in the WTC wall? Or is the plane going to be CRUSHED?
Does anyone REALLY think the former????
1 Comments:
Great Work!
Post a Comment
<< Home