KIlltown Continues to Kick Ass
on the Val McClatchy photo. He's done really great work.
There are only two explanations, and both indicate funny business with the official flight 93 story--
1) the photo is real, meaning that there was a munitions explosion in the wrong place from the official crash site
2) the photo was fake, and the FBI was involved in the fakery
Pick your poison.
There are only two explanations, and both indicate funny business with the official flight 93 story--
1) the photo is real, meaning that there was a munitions explosion in the wrong place from the official crash site
2) the photo was fake, and the FBI was involved in the fakery
Pick your poison.
20 Comments:
You need to read the JREF boards, Spook. Killtown is getting his ass handed to him over there.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=61633
"Getting his ass handed to him" is appropriate. Killtown's smoke plumes and conclusions have both been arrived at via rectal extraction.
oh for god sake sword! you just got thru telling us that the reason there is no crash debris in the photo of the official crash site is because the entire plane was rendered into confetti due to the high speed and sharp angle of impact - now here's a little puff of smoke that the fbi says was taken only 5 seconds after your confetti-fest and it's not even in proper alignment between the official crash site and the camera.
and despite all of this you claim that killtown is getting his ass handed to him.
pinch is way ahead of you in the fine art of trolling since he at least has the brains to realize that if a little puff of smoke rendered the entire plane into confetti then the large pieces of fuselage that were paraded out for the mooseowie trial had to come from somewhere other than the official crash site.
but not only does it not bother you morons that your own govt would lie to you, you actually find all of this amusing!
now here's a little puff of smoke that the fbi says was taken only 5 seconds after your confetti-fest and it's not even in proper alignment between the official crash site and the camera.
Here's a clue: the FBI does not say it was five seconds. Val thought she recalled 5 seconds after she heard the boom, but her recollection of the time it took is not reliable.
pinch is way ahead of you in the fine art of trolling since he at least has the brains to realize that if a little puff of smoke rendered the entire plane into confetti then the large pieces of fuselage that were paraded out for the mooseowie trial had to come from somewhere other than the official crash site.
That doesn't confuse me - mostly confetti, a few chunks. Sorry you're having trouble understanding that.
perhaps killtown should not be slandering val - if indeed he is, that's not any of my business.
That doesn't confuse me - mostly confetti, a few chunks. Sorry you're having trouble understanding that.
what does that mean? when asked the question: where is the crash debris in the photo of the official crash crater?
sword says that since ua93 plunged into the ground at near 90deg angle at ~400mph it was all turned into confetti
is that why there is no evidence of crash debris at the official crash site? or is there some other reason that there is no wreckage whatsoever at the official crash site?
if it was all confetti'd then the photos of chunx of fuselage used as evidence in the mooseowie trial must be false. and if it was NOT all confetti'd then where the devil is the crash debris in the photos of the official crash crater?
it is as simple as that.
and are you trying to say that since killtown is slandering val, that means that the little map of the direction of the puff of smoke doesn't count? the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke is not lined up with the official crater. at which there was no official 757 debris.
this entire flight93 charade is effin stupid. mushroom cloud! right.
Hideous. What an ignorant, cruel person Killtown is.
It won't suprise you to learn that he is also a white supremacist then?
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7618
Suspecting what the Israeli/Palistine conflict is really about, the strong evidence Israel was involved with 9/11, and seeing how 9/11 was faked in general, it makes me wonder how much of the Holocaust was true or not....
...It is my belief that if the holocaust didn't happen, then Israel would not be a state right now. This alone gives strong evidence that the zionists behind getting Israel created would exaggerate the holocaust for their end means.
- Killtown on the Loose Change forums
wow is killtown some kind of punk bastard? now i'm furious! and i'm not even jewish.
that doesn't change the fact that the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke is not lined up with the official crater at which there was no official 757 debris.
that doesn't change the fact that the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke is not lined up with the official crater at which there was no official 757 debris.
If you think you can prove that, then by all means head over to JREF and take them on.
http://forums.randi.org/
J--that doesn't change the fact that the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke is not lined up with the official crater at which there was no official 757 debris.
SOT--If you think you can prove that, then by all means head over to JREF and take them on.
Christ almighty-- it's already proven! If people are skeptical about the truth, that is their problem.
And what Killtown wrote hardly makes him a white supremecist-- though I am not endorsing his comments either.
by the way, the point IS either:
1) the photo is real, meaning that there was a munitions explosion in the wrong place from the official crash site
2) the photo was fake, and the FBI was involved in the fakery
I'm not clear why this is so hard to process for so many folks.
Either way, this proves there is somehting majorly wrong with the flight 93 story.
Which is it folks?
Those are your two options. There's no doubt.
oh he knows damn well what the point is:
the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke does not line up with the little official crater at which there was no official 757 debris.
Spook, first, it is not proven that the plume is from anything but a major aircraft impact.
Second, you can tell that 9-11 was a fraud torching by a rabbit cage and playing a video game but you can't tell that Killtown is a white supremacist from his hatred of jews and gays and his defense of Hitler?
I think that pretty much says all we need to know about your ability to perceive reality.
uh, where did Killtown say he hated jews and gays and where did he defend Hitler?
Also, FS is not a video game. It is flight simulation software.
Talk about perceiving reality.
In any case, you're changing the topic again.
Wow...
In case you haven't heard, denying the holocaust = defending hitler.
About the pilot of flight 77, Killtown said this: "Doesn't it seem odd that a person like Capt. Burlingame would be flying with a openly gay co-pilot?"
KT doesn't know anything about Captain Burlingame. He hasn't interviewed any of his family members or friends. He has just cherry picked comments taken from the mass media. It's obviously his own hatred of homosexuals that KT is imposing on Capt. Burlingame.
His claims that Israel was involved are completely unsupported by any evidence. It's an obvious case of him adding in his favorite enemy just for the sake of venting his rage against them.
This child is an obvious nazi. Why do you tolerate him?
And Flight Simulator, as I pointed out before is not accurate enough to be used as a tool of forensic analysis.
For the pourpose you are trying to use it for, it is a video game. It has no bearing on reality.
Just like your burning rabbit cage.
ok i'll say it - killtown is a punk bastard and i am furious! and i'm not even jewish.
hey killtown! consider yourself to be a punk bastard!
----
now then.
the map clearly shows that the little official puff of smoke does not line up with the little official crater at which there was no official 757 debris!
Care to show your calculations on that, J?
I'd like to know how you came to the values you used for all the variables like wind speed, humidity, ambient temperature, barometric pressure, fuel dispersal and so forth.
oh, do all those variables tell you that is NOT a little puff of smoke? or that it IS lined up directly between the camera and the crater? which still doesn't have any debris in it?
Are you dodging the question, J?
Why won't you show me your calculations?
Post a Comment
<< Home