Humint Events Online: CONTEST

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

CONTEST

Who will be the first to describe what is in this photo? What structures are we seeing and what direction was this photo taken from?

There is a prize, a $20 gift certificate from Amazon.com.

Leave answers in the comments section, please.

18 Comments:

Anonymous shep said...

In the picture, the remains of WTC4 are the two building fragments toward the right of the traffic light (dark, burned color) with WTC2 perimeter columns stuck in the ground toward the left of the traffic light (lawn jarts). The picture was taken from Church close to the corner near Liberty.

More WTC4 pictures

What are you seeing in this picture is the result of complete pulverization of the WTC complex by use of thermate ofcourse ;-)

2:11 PM  
Anonymous j said...

oh the magic of thermate! ha ha.
perimeter columns with some aluminum cladding still intact.

3:00 PM  
Anonymous Sword of Truth said...

It's a photograph of a cloaked UFO piloted by the evil space-jews examining the effects of thier subspace phased tachyon pulse cannons.

Do I win?

8:58 PM  
Anonymous j said...

of course you win, you are the ever-enigmatic sword of truth. the slightest tidbit of wisdom that you ever deign to allow escape from your wise lips rises you to the status of 9/11 truth master.
all bow to the exalted sword of truth! moron.

12:04 AM  
Anonymous Sword of Truth said...

Hey, space jews with death rays is YOUR theory.

If it makes you mad, don't say it yourself.

12:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like the Humbug from the Phantom Tollbooth, Sword of Truth can swim through the Sea of Knowledge without even getting wet!

2:58 AM  
Blogger Spooked said...

Good job, Shep-- though you didn't exactly say the direction. But close enough. Email me if you want the prize.

So who ever said anything about "space jews"? Or is that simply from SOT's feverish imagination?

6:37 AM  
Anonymous shep said...

Spooked, take that $20 from Amazon a buy a copy of:

How to Think Like a Scientist: Answering Questions by the Scientific Method
A Beginners Guide to the Scientific Method

and then sent it off to the blogger brigade-- I think a few of those clowns could use it! ;-)

Happy Thanksgiving!

10:13 AM  
Anonymous Sword of Truth said...

I count at least four links to white supremacist/neo-nazi websites in your "highly reccomended" list. You were spastically bashing jews on this blog during the recent Isreali defensive action in Lebanon. You have fully endorsed Judy "Scholars for Tooth" Woods insane death star theory.

"Space-jews with rayguns" is a rather short, but entirely accurate description of your beliefs.

12:08 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

I think a few of those clowns could use it! ;-)

Indeed!

Happy Thanksgiving!

Same to you!

12:42 PM  
Anonymous j said...

Woods insane death star theory

insane theory? it's the only theory that accounts for the complete disintegration of all of the concrete and much of the steel of the wtc1&2.
not to mention the spontaneous combustion of many dozens of automobiles, many of which were several blocks distant from the towers.
has NIST or the 9/11 commission even pretended to explain this phenomenon? no. can you explain this phenomenon sword of truth?

what do you believe sword of truth? put your fat head where your big mouth is for once.

4:44 PM  
Anonymous anonymous ha said...

Fuel fires burn intensely for short periods of time. Fuel fires also burn at well-known scientific temperatures. Scientifically, and thus logically, fuel fires cannot melt steel, which requires blast furnace conditions. Melted pools of steel were discovered, observed and recorded in the debris of three steel skyscrapers long after September 11, 2001. Logically then, fuel fires alone did not destroy the World Trade Center. Logically then, some other, far more powerful substance that could melt steel must have.

5:14 PM  
Blogger Ningen said...

Sword of Truth said:

"You were spastically bashing jews on this blog during the recent Isreali defensive action in Lebanon."

I looked, and found no such bashing of Israel, let alone Jews.

Spooked said this after Israel's military bombed UN positions:

"Who Honestly Believes Anymore
that the Israelis are the "good guys" in this conflict? . . . I am NOT saying Hezbollah are the good guys either-- it's just that increasingly, it's harder and harder to justify Israel's actions. And given the history of the UN and Israel, it's hard to believe this was a mere accident."


http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/07/who-honestly-believes-anymore.html

Does not bash Israel, let along Jews. It is a criticism of Israel's actions.

There is this:

*FWIW, I have nothing against Israel trying to take out the hezbollah rocket launchers-- that only seems fair. But I don't think it is right for Israel to attack clearly civilian targets in Lebanon, such as the Beirut airport. The more Israel strays from bombing pure military targets, the worse they look, and the more like the Islamic extremsists they look-- I don't care "who started it".

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/07/bush-watch.html

You call that "bashing the jews"?

Even if you think that criticizing Israel is off limits and per se anti-Semitism, which is absurd, Spooked had this article:

"Did the British Warn the Israelis or Did the Israelis Warn the British?"

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2005/07/did-british-warn-israelis-or-did.html

The article refuted claims that the British warned the Israelis before July 7 attacks in London, and said it was the opposite. An Israel basher would not provide this information.

Finally, Spooked cites the website of Jared Israel, who does excellent analysis, and is strongly pro-Israel (or more accurately, strongly anti-anti-Israel abd very critical of Palestinians:

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/06/forgotten-war.html

Sword of Truth, I must warn you not to read Jared Israel's website, Emperor's Clothes. I fear that your brain will explode from the cognitive dissonance. Assuming you are for real.

What does Judy Wood's theory have to do with Jews?

Now, about the white supremacist websites, I assume you mean Killtown. I saw what he said on the LC forum, and your debate with him about that. His views on the Holocaust bother me too. I don't think that reflects on Spooked -- the only criticism I would have of Killtown's websites is what I see as an inordinate emphasis on Israeli involvement in 9/11, but that is not prominent, and Israel is not off limits if evidence leads there. I haven't seen that.

7:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sword of Truth - aka "Can Opener of Convenience". Likes to belong. Uncritically supports authority figures. Mostly harmless.

11:16 PM  
Anonymous Jim said...

I don't what these pictures propose to show, but I know what they do not -- which is a pancake or progressive collapse of a building. Anyone who does see that just isn't opening their eyes.

2:53 PM  
Anonymous Sword of Truth said...

First, I said FIVE neo-nazi links. That's four of KKKilltown and Morgan Reynolds site. Half the articles on wich are co-written by RicKKK Ratjer.

KKKilltown and Ratjer are violent sociopaths. Promoters of religious and ethnic hatreds like them are not to be coddled or even associated with. By endorsing KKKilltown, Spooked endorses KKKilltowns beliefs.

People like him are using 9-11 conspiracy theories to re-legitimize thier ugly philosophy and Spooked and the rest are all too willing to help.

If the gates of Auschwitz ever reopen, if the nerve gas ever starts to flow back into its "shower stalls", if the ovens ever flare back to life, it will be because of Spooked and you.

3:37 PM  
Anonymous jha said...

violent sociopaths.!
if the ovens ever flare back to life, it will be because of Spooked and you.!

again, sword of truth, put your fat head where your big mouth is and explain the spontaneous combustion of many dozens of autos many of which were several blocks distant from where the wtc1&2 had all of it's concrete and much of it's steel completely disintegrated at the astounding rate of 11 floors per second, which you should also explain.
until you do i wish you would just shut up.

6:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sword of truth, james B, and conspiracy smasher are, i'm convinced, either nationalistic/"patriotic" (jingoist) nutcases who refuse to believe the US Govt could have been behind S-11, or they are real covert operatives...one of the tactics of counter-intelligence is to ridicule...and if they are indeed spooks/operatives/agents...
FUCK 'EM!!!! FUCK 'EM!!! FUCK 'EM!!! cause it's motherf*ckers like them who planned S-11, or carried it out...some of the "truthers" are too nice...are the people who carried out S-11 nice? how nice can we be, before they re-instate the draft (rangel, that f*cking war pig) or carry out another false-flag/state-terror Psy-Op? fight fire with fire...

9:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger