Plane or No Plane-- Which Is the Fake?
Plane:
No plane:
Plane:
No plane:
Plane:
No plane:
Plane version:
No plane version:
Here is the no-plane version of the "Cheney hit" video.
Here are frames extracted from the complete plane version-- the plane comes in at frame 1362.
One thing that is useful in the Cheney hit video is how the footage has discolorations that come and go. These make it useful to align the frames-- and the two videos do line up fairly well in terms of the smoke puffs and explosion.
If the fakers took the plane OUT of the original, they did a good job!
If the fakers put a plane IN to the original, they didn't do such a good job. The plane certainly LOOKS fake-- I think most people would agree. That doesn't automatically make the plane fake, of course, but it doesn't help.
There are a few interesting things about this no-plane video. One is this strange feeling that I have seen this video before-- though I have no idea where I could have seen it. The other thing, which may relate to the first thing, is that I always imagined if there was video fakery of the 2nd plane, that this is what the towers would have looked like as they were "hit"-- just an explosion exactly like when the plane hit, but with no plane image.
The last thing is that it is fascinating how the building damage starts with the smoke puffs corresponding to the engines on the plane. What is causing this? Beam weapons? Internal explosives? Missiles?
Note: the plane version of the Cheney hit clip can be viewed here.
No plane:
Plane:
No plane:
Plane:
No plane:
Plane version:
No plane version:
Here is the no-plane version of the "Cheney hit" video.
Here are frames extracted from the complete plane version-- the plane comes in at frame 1362.
One thing that is useful in the Cheney hit video is how the footage has discolorations that come and go. These make it useful to align the frames-- and the two videos do line up fairly well in terms of the smoke puffs and explosion.
If the fakers took the plane OUT of the original, they did a good job!
If the fakers put a plane IN to the original, they didn't do such a good job. The plane certainly LOOKS fake-- I think most people would agree. That doesn't automatically make the plane fake, of course, but it doesn't help.
There are a few interesting things about this no-plane video. One is this strange feeling that I have seen this video before-- though I have no idea where I could have seen it. The other thing, which may relate to the first thing, is that I always imagined if there was video fakery of the 2nd plane, that this is what the towers would have looked like as they were "hit"-- just an explosion exactly like when the plane hit, but with no plane image.
The last thing is that it is fascinating how the building damage starts with the smoke puffs corresponding to the engines on the plane. What is causing this? Beam weapons? Internal explosives? Missiles?
Note: the plane version of the Cheney hit clip can be viewed here.
posted by spooked at 8:07 AM
8 Comments:
Spooked, one more possibility is that the no-plane video altered the plane video to take out a fake plane. So the no-plane video is fake in the sense it was altered, but it restores the image to its original no-plane form. That ruins authenticity, but a showing that this video was altered does not show there was really a plane.
It's interesting to see the external explosion without the plane there. It seems very small. Compare that with this:
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html
This is a smaller plane hitter a concrete wall - look how big the explosion is. The wall may be harder than the building, but the building is rigid in comparison to the plane and there should have been much visible explosion, in my lay opinion.
A comment on this website's comparison of the Pentagon event with the Sandia collision: the author of this website wants it both ways -- the heavy masonry facade of the Pentagon was so hard that it reduced the 757 to confetti, yet was soft enough to allow the plane to penetrate several wings of the building. That makes no sense.
A question -- when was this plane video first broadcast on television?
Sppoked, have you seen this compilation of news broadcasts of the South Tower explosion?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thOGlcatpDA
The Channel 4 chopper footage beginning aat 2:11 is interesting -- the plane is so indistinct as it comes in, and the timing seems bit long after it disappears behind the buildings. And I wonder why people in the chopper did not see the plane coming in.
There are other local news clips where the plane is not visible. It is visible in WB 11. The last clip, on NPR, starting about 7:00, is strange because the people don't seem to react to the plane as it comes in, only reacting as the building explodes. The audio could have been edited out, but the woman watching does not seem to react at all until the explosion. It seems she would be moving her head and pointing her camera as the plane came in. She doesn't move until the explosion, then points her camera. Of course, she could have been daydreaming, but it is strange.
Compare to this version.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2005/270405newfootage.htm
This Prison Planet posting is the first I saw of the vid. It is the oldest I can find. Why is the color more realistic?
beyond TV/Video fakery, "truthers" must connect the link between the demolitions and Fema's terror drills...rick siegel's video may have captured Fema helicopters flying over the towers just before they collapsed, and there were strange white flashes in the smoke (cutter charges?) as the choppers flew over the towers...they could have been top-down demolitions, but there were certainly major seismic events (underground mini-nukes?) before the collapses, also captured by Siegel's video...
Ningen--
yeah, I also thought of that the video was altered to take a fake plane out after I already posted this. Good point!
On the videos, I've looked at all of them and there are countless irregularities, many of which I've documented here.
This Cheney hit video was first broadcast on a CBC documenary on 9/11 many years after 9/11-- it is probably the last 2nd hit footage to appear.
If I am not mistaken, the NRO was doing the "airplanes into buildings drill" and they're the guys who have lots of satellites at their disposal. It's starting to make sense.
Fred
Post a Comment
<< Home