Impact Hole Analysis
In considering what exactly happened to the North tower versus the South tower, it is important to look at what happened immediately after the impact-- since the plane images cannot be trusted. The explosion however, can be considered more-or-less authentic.
And there are in fact very different things that happen at the "entry" hole for both the North and South tower.
The screen shots here have been taken from clips in the video compilation P200015 offered as evidence at the Moussaoui trial in August 2006.
Here are the flames coming out of the North tower, about 7 seconds after impact:
Here are the flames coming out of the North tower, about 10 seconds after impact, note how the complete entry hole is flaming-- from edge to edge:
Here is a fireball coming out of the South tower, about 3 seconds after impact:
Here is the South tower, about 8 seconds after impact-- the flames are gone at the entry hole, there is only lots of smoke:
Here is the South tower entry hole, shortly later (not clear exactly when from the video):
At this point, the main smoke seems to be coming from a strange blackened area quite a way off from the entry hole:
CLEARLY, there are huge differences in the behaviour of the entry holes between the North and South tower hits, even though the planes were officially the same type.
Apparent differences in the hits:
1) speed-- the South tower plane hit faster (about 540 mph) than the North tower plane hit (about 450 mph), if you believe the videos.
2) impact on core area-- the South tower plane officially hit the core to one side, with the port wing and fuselage hitting the core, whereas the North tower plane officially hit the core in the middle, with both wings and the fuselage hitting the core.
3) thickness of outer wall columns at entry holes-- for the South tower entry hole (floors 79-82), the columns were officially 13/16th inch steel on two sides (the lateral sides) and 1/4 inch steel thick on two sides (the outer and inner sides), whereas for the for the North tower entry hole (floors 94-96), the columns were officially 3/8th inch steel on two sides (the lateral sides) and 1/4 inch steel thick on two sides (the outer and inner sides).
The significantly greater thickness of the South tower entry hole columns should negate the effect of the extra speed (officially) carried by the South tower plane, in terms of penetration of the wings.
What appears to have happened (officially) at the North tower is the wings burst open upon impact, spraying fuel out of the wing tanks, causing huge flames to burst out of the entry hole.
This CLEARLY didn't happen at the South tower, and there is no apparent reason why.
Logically, the thicker steel columns at the South tower impact region should have also caused the wings to burst open upon impact, spraying fuel out of the wing tanks, again causing huge flames to burst out of the entry hole.
Instead, the sequence at the South tower shows a fireball emanating from the center of the tower, well after the plane has completely entered in the videos. There is also the issue, that I have touched on before, that the port wing of the South tower plane never seems to produce any significant fireball, whereas the majority of the South tower fireball emanates from the end of the starboard wing.
This makes little sense in terms of the official story, but does make sense if the South tower attack was a hoax of some sort, involving the explosion of an internal fuel-bomb that is set to explode coincidentally with the production of the outer plane-shaped hole.
Curiously, the North tower hit and fireball pattern makes more sense for a real plane crash than what happened at the South tower.
And there are in fact very different things that happen at the "entry" hole for both the North and South tower.
The screen shots here have been taken from clips in the video compilation P200015 offered as evidence at the Moussaoui trial in August 2006.
Here are the flames coming out of the North tower, about 7 seconds after impact:
Here are the flames coming out of the North tower, about 10 seconds after impact, note how the complete entry hole is flaming-- from edge to edge:
Here is a fireball coming out of the South tower, about 3 seconds after impact:
Here is the South tower, about 8 seconds after impact-- the flames are gone at the entry hole, there is only lots of smoke:
Here is the South tower entry hole, shortly later (not clear exactly when from the video):
At this point, the main smoke seems to be coming from a strange blackened area quite a way off from the entry hole:
CLEARLY, there are huge differences in the behaviour of the entry holes between the North and South tower hits, even though the planes were officially the same type.
Apparent differences in the hits:
1) speed-- the South tower plane hit faster (about 540 mph) than the North tower plane hit (about 450 mph), if you believe the videos.
2) impact on core area-- the South tower plane officially hit the core to one side, with the port wing and fuselage hitting the core, whereas the North tower plane officially hit the core in the middle, with both wings and the fuselage hitting the core.
3) thickness of outer wall columns at entry holes-- for the South tower entry hole (floors 79-82), the columns were officially 13/16th inch steel on two sides (the lateral sides) and 1/4 inch steel thick on two sides (the outer and inner sides), whereas for the for the North tower entry hole (floors 94-96), the columns were officially 3/8th inch steel on two sides (the lateral sides) and 1/4 inch steel thick on two sides (the outer and inner sides).
The significantly greater thickness of the South tower entry hole columns should negate the effect of the extra speed (officially) carried by the South tower plane, in terms of penetration of the wings.
What appears to have happened (officially) at the North tower is the wings burst open upon impact, spraying fuel out of the wing tanks, causing huge flames to burst out of the entry hole.
This CLEARLY didn't happen at the South tower, and there is no apparent reason why.
Logically, the thicker steel columns at the South tower impact region should have also caused the wings to burst open upon impact, spraying fuel out of the wing tanks, again causing huge flames to burst out of the entry hole.
Instead, the sequence at the South tower shows a fireball emanating from the center of the tower, well after the plane has completely entered in the videos. There is also the issue, that I have touched on before, that the port wing of the South tower plane never seems to produce any significant fireball, whereas the majority of the South tower fireball emanates from the end of the starboard wing.
This makes little sense in terms of the official story, but does make sense if the South tower attack was a hoax of some sort, involving the explosion of an internal fuel-bomb that is set to explode coincidentally with the production of the outer plane-shaped hole.
Curiously, the North tower hit and fireball pattern makes more sense for a real plane crash than what happened at the South tower.
posted by spooked at 2:00 PM
5 Comments:
There's a nice article on cruise missiles over at how stuff works.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/special_report/1998/kosovo/newsid_192000/192191.stm
They can carry conventional 1,000lb bombs or nuclear weapons, or clusters of smaller 'bomblets'.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/cruise-missile3.htm
Guidance
The hallmark of a cruise missile is its incredible accuracy. A common statement made about the cruise missile is, "It can fly 1,000 miles and hit a target the size of a single-car garage." Cruise missiles are also very effective at evading detection by the enemy because they fly very low to the ground (out of the view of most radar systems).
Anyway, the "bomblets" would explain how they're able to get the linear damage to make the basic plane shape. The missile goes roughly the same speed that the plane is supposed to have gone, so some people probably saw it and assumed it's a plane. You'd have to be paying really close attention to figure out what it is, normally you see planes overhead.
I'd guess that they then did the TV fakery to edit out the missile and paste in the cartoon jet. They used their hand-chosen eyewitness to say "plane very deliberately flying".
Certainly they could have used the same thing at the pentagon (but without the bomblets) and maybe even shanksville? Shanksville is easy because you can make a hole in the ground with shovels if you want. There's nothing plane-like about shanksville that I can see. So, right now my pet theory is missile+TVFakery for the distraction hit, and conventional explosives + exotic weaponry for WTC 1 and 2 demolition.
There may or may not have been a distraction fly-by plane over manhattan, and the "White Elephant Plane" is probably part of the operation and just circling around checking out damage etc.
Fred.
i remember being just riveted to the TV on 9/11 - what i remember most was the many reports of a missile being fired from the woolworth building - more than 1 channel was reporting that - not a word has been said since the day of 9/11 about that.
don't forget that at shanksville there was green grass growing in the crater that was supposedly made that very day.
http://blog.myspace.com/youth_for_truth
are all of these people wearing tin-foil underpants? or is it just me?
we're having quite the giggley snicker at your expense over at the CS blog!
I just had this thought (and it may very well have been addressed already by someone else), but how about this: The scar was pre-formed in a low-tech fashion (say, "construction workers") before the attack. Then, they just left some explosives there to knock out the scar like a piece of a jigsaw puzzle? That way, the shape would be roughly plane shaped and they wouldn't have to worry about the explosives accidentally producing really weird-looking damage to the building.
Just a thought. Fred.
Merry Christmas everybody.
Post a Comment
<< Home