A New 2nd Hit Video!
#34:
The first clip is similar to #s 5 and 6 on this page, but clearly is unique.
The second clip is #9 on the page.
Coffinman, who put up the Youtube video, has a new site which is worth a look-see.
The first clip is similar to #s 5 and 6 on this page, but clearly is unique.
The second clip is #9 on the page.
Coffinman, who put up the Youtube video, has a new site which is worth a look-see.
posted by spooked at 1:25 PM
8 Comments:
"oh my goodness! wow jane aren't we shocked and appalled at this surprise plane from out of nowhere? oh my goodness!"
"right betty! we are definitely shocked and appalled at this deliberate act of terrorism on the part of evil-doers! by the way betty didn't that plane seem as if it was travelling 500+ mph?"
"right you are jane! 500 mph at least! and of course we're seeing this live for the very first time that's why we're just so shocked and appalled!"
-----
you know what?
fuck you sword of conspiracy pincher gang! beginning now i will refer to you guys as "the b-unit" in honor of your newest member: james b. of the screwyrabbitchange blog.
I couldn't see a plane in the second, Channel 4 video. It doesn't seem to me the angle would have hidden it behind the building. Has the plane been removed from the video> Interesting how the commentary is just on the observations, unlike the first video, which launches right into "this must be terrorism." Also, in the first video, how did they know it was a plane right away if they didn't observe it coming in? They were talking about "choppers" and a "police helicopter" before the explosion. Where are they? Does a helicopter look and move like a plane?
It seems she did not actually see it, but was told it was a plane.
The plane is in the Channel 4 video, but you have to look hard. It comes from the top right of the screen at about 55 seconds.
i'd like to hear gerard holmgren's opinion on this video...
to me, the planes come from two different angles...
james B is DEFINITELY part of that CS/Pinch/Sword/Screw crew...i think they're paid spooks, cointelpro...
Like hey man, I mean, like there were no planes, it was like a missle, and then the plane, and my man Jason like he did research, and he knows this stuff, he says there were no planes, so this is like not real.
chopper 4 could have caught the real deal. it certainly doesn't look like a big airliner full of arab hijackers, that's for sure
fred
Thanks, wftgawhth. I saw it.
Is it odd for all the videos to be blurry? It was a clear day.
This question also relates to my question about why the media wasn't aware a plane was coming in. It seems logical that local police and fire would have learned about this plane heading in and that the media would have picked up on this on police band radio. Thus, I would expect media helicopters that were in the air to have been zooming in on the plane as it came in. In every film, the plane flies in and then the media reacts, and in every film, the plane is shot at a distance and is blurry.
I think the Chopper 4 video is real. If you look at the "cutout" imprint of the plane in WTC 1, its size is WAY bigger than the blur (plane) which is heading to WTC2. Since they are right next to each other there cannot be that big of size differential from line of sight. All of these abnormalities are real, but peddlers of the "official story" always respond with, "Then what DID happen?" Although in general the public desires such an answer -- and if one could be provided it would make public acceptance of the government's role much easier -- it is not our duty to provide one, since we did not commit the act. However, I do think the absence of a comprehensive theory explaining all anomolies (at WTC, Shanksville, Pentagon) is the missing ingredient needed for universal acceptance.
Post a Comment
<< Home