The Myth of Jesus, the Myth of the Hijacked Planes*
Reading this amusing article on how a holy artifact that was supposedly Jesus' ancient preserved foreskin was "stolen", made me think of the absurdity that anyone would believe that some shriveled piece of skin was in fact the tip of Jesus Christ's penis.
That absurdity made me especially remember this book ("The Jesus Puzzle", by Earl Doherty), which makes a fairly convincing case that there simply was no historical Jesus. There was no living Jesus person, period.
Rather, it appears that Jesus was a larger-than-life mythical creation brought alive by the writers of the first four chapters of the new testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The myth was then propagated and buffed up through the centuries by Christians. And frankly this makes more sense to me than the actual New Testament itself. The book is an excellent read if you're interested in religion.
Thinking of Jesus as a myth made me think of the how the hijacked planes on 9/11 appear to be similarly mythical, and were brought to life by the perpetrators and media scribes of 9/11. Many bogus artifacts are associated with Jesus (e.g. the foreskin, the shroud of Turin, the Holy Grail) in perhaps the same way as bogus planes debris is associated with the hijacked planes.
As well, both Jesus and the hijacked planes had their miracles. Jesus walked on water and turned water into wine. Flight 175 sliced into the steel and concrete of WTC2 like a knife into butter, and flight 93 disappeared into a small plane-shaped hole in the ground.
The analogy is not perfect-- but the general idea is the same. Jesus and the hijacked planes both appear to be Big Lies sold to the world at large, and lies that most people accept and dare not question due to the sanctity of the myth.
Indeed, to someone who is a devout Christian, questioning the existence of Jesus is tantamount to admitting you are Satan.
In fact, 9/11 is much like a religion to many-- particularly hard-core Republicans. To these people, simply questioning 9/11 is evidence of severe derangement-- and god forbid you actually find the official story is wrong in any significant way! But even among many 9/11 skeptics-- god forbid you question the existence of the hijacked planes!
Nonetheless, the accumulated evidence strongly indicates the 9/11 hijacked planes and the damage they caused were a giant hoax-- a big lie.
*In other words, how many people can I piss off with one post?
Merry Christmas!!!
That absurdity made me especially remember this book ("The Jesus Puzzle", by Earl Doherty), which makes a fairly convincing case that there simply was no historical Jesus. There was no living Jesus person, period.
Rather, it appears that Jesus was a larger-than-life mythical creation brought alive by the writers of the first four chapters of the new testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The myth was then propagated and buffed up through the centuries by Christians. And frankly this makes more sense to me than the actual New Testament itself. The book is an excellent read if you're interested in religion.
Thinking of Jesus as a myth made me think of the how the hijacked planes on 9/11 appear to be similarly mythical, and were brought to life by the perpetrators and media scribes of 9/11. Many bogus artifacts are associated with Jesus (e.g. the foreskin, the shroud of Turin, the Holy Grail) in perhaps the same way as bogus planes debris is associated with the hijacked planes.
As well, both Jesus and the hijacked planes had their miracles. Jesus walked on water and turned water into wine. Flight 175 sliced into the steel and concrete of WTC2 like a knife into butter, and flight 93 disappeared into a small plane-shaped hole in the ground.
The analogy is not perfect-- but the general idea is the same. Jesus and the hijacked planes both appear to be Big Lies sold to the world at large, and lies that most people accept and dare not question due to the sanctity of the myth.
Indeed, to someone who is a devout Christian, questioning the existence of Jesus is tantamount to admitting you are Satan.
In fact, 9/11 is much like a religion to many-- particularly hard-core Republicans. To these people, simply questioning 9/11 is evidence of severe derangement-- and god forbid you actually find the official story is wrong in any significant way! But even among many 9/11 skeptics-- god forbid you question the existence of the hijacked planes!
Nonetheless, the accumulated evidence strongly indicates the 9/11 hijacked planes and the damage they caused were a giant hoax-- a big lie.
*In other words, how many people can I piss off with one post?
Merry Christmas!!!
posted by spooked at 1:03 PM
30 Comments:
"In fact, 9/11 is much like a religion to many"
Like you perhaps?
Merry Christmas!!!
and a happy solstice to you!
i am continually surprised by some of the topics you blog about Spooked. your post reminded me about some of the special celestial happenings at this time of year. here's so food for thought:
http://people.tribe.net/patrick-brown/blog/0d500935-fde4-4afe-9044-7c588deeb7a5
http://www.robertbauval.co.uk/articles/articles/egstarbeth3.html
Pharmacratic Inquisition <-- red pill alert!
you'll need to dig down a bit and look up in the sky, but with a little research (and stargazing), everyone can find the true meaning behind christmas.
Jesus knocked down the towers.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7528291488745524340&
Getting close. New soundtrack. New documents. More info. Needs feedback!
For those of you with faster connections, I give you, slightly higher quality!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4814742375426365649&hl=en
Fred
PS the "Octopus" is Tarpley's metaphor for the rogue network of government insiders and their backers responsible for the 9/11 attacks. You guys should give me some suggestions for additional photos and things that should be in here.
(and tell me if it sucks or not, and how to make it better.) I'm open to ideas.
I still wonder if something like this was involved: "Operation Plowshare, better known as Project Plowshare, not to be confused with the anti-nuclear Plowshares Movement, was the overall United States term for the development of techniques to use nuclear explosives for peaceful construction purposes. The phrase was coined in 1961, taken from Micah 4:3 ("And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more"). It was the U.S. portion of what are called Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNE). The Soviet Union had a similar program of testing as well for many years [1]. The Soviet program was titled Nuclear Explosions for the National Economy."
what would jesus do? ha.
fred this one is much better!
in the earlier one though the repetive casio-type music that slowed down to a halt was a good effect - i think that effect was a subtle attention grabber, if you see what i'm saying.
"Nuclear Explosions for the National Economy"
Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNE)
- unfucking real.
Virgin Birth on Way for Komodo Dragon
oh the new messiah is coming!
I think you are on the right track with the operation plowshares. Also keep in mind that rumsfeld and those other regan era guys got ridiculed for their Star Wars advocacy by the "Union of Concerned Scientists", so there's probably a "see-we-told-you it was real" aspect to this (within the defense establishment).
Also, the NRO (satellite guys) had the "plane crash into a building drill" on 911. I presume that part of the drill was to evacuate the building. If so, that tells you where they had the space weapon guys running the high energy star wars part of the operation (from the NRO HQ).
Thanks for the feedback, ha not b. Maybe i can take the slow-down part of the techno track and use some of it. I got a couple of complaints that it was way too repetitive so I tried to use "less-offensive" music this time around.
If anyone has good ideas for scenes or things to include, please let me know. I want to put in a couple more of obviously fake news stories that the media lapped up with zero questioning, and any kind of visually stunning photos or things that grab people. I assume very few people will read a paper, so it's important to do something to expose the media-hoax side of 911. (I think)
Fred
The contents of this weblog and the IP addresses of those who have posted here have been archived and forwarded to the appropriate agencies.
Or Jesus was a real person who hoaxed his death/ressurection...
just like THEY hoaxed the planes etc....
and later it was written up as an offical story in a holy book....
the chief author of said holy book of myths a spy(Saul-Paul/Zelikow) for the evil overlords (Bush-Clinton/Sanhedrin)
best fucking blog on the internet, PERIOD!!!
more power to ya in '07 spooked!!
:-)
Homesec said:
"The contents of this weblog and the IP addresses of those who have posted here have been archived and forwarded to the appropriate agencies."
You must mean the FBI and Justice, who I trust are preparing prosecutions of the perpetrators of 9/11. It's about time. This weblog should be a great help for them.
"best fucking blog on the internet, PERIOD!!!"
I second that. Thanks Spooked!
best fucking blog on the internet, PERIOD!!!
more power to ya in '07 spooked!!
i endorse that absolutely!
---
The contents of this weblog and the IP addresses of those who have posted here have been archived and forwarded to the appropriate agencies.
hey will we be branded as traitors? will we each get our day in court where we can bust out our respective 9/11 info files and expose each and every fallacy that is the official 9/11 fairytale? or will we merely be disappeared, thus validating our position even further?
sidewise smiley face to you homesec!
james ha.
Thanks guys!
(blush blush)
You do realize of course, that of any of you were tried for your activities in support of the enemy that no twoofers would be allowed on the jury, don't you?
9/11 conspiracy whack-jobs along with any other enemy sympathizers would be thrown out in voir dire without the prosecution having to use any of its pre-emptory challenges.
Still feel confident about bringing your bullshit before a jury?
and once again the mighty sword of conspiracy pincher (buh buh buh buh buh buh, B-UNIT!)
completely ignores the issues of the spontaneously combusted cars and the total powderization of ALL the concrete and MUCH of the steel of BOTH wtc towers (at the astounding rate of 11 floors per second each) thus proving yet again that the entire B-UNIT is capitulating to the truth and has absolutely no leg to stand on whatsoever.
good show sword!
on behalf of non-cowardly anti-shills everywhere, i accept your complete foolishness for the utter defeat that we all know it actually is.
salud and sidewise smiley face to the B-UNIT!
Please prove that the cars in question were too far away from the WTC to be affected by the collapses.
Please prove that the amount of pulverization of concrete is what you say it was.
Please prove that the claimed pulverization should not have occurred under the circumstances described by the engineering community.
I've asked for proof several times and each time you have refused to provide it.
I've asked for proof several times and each time you have refused to provide it.
sword you are so full of shit that it is almost comical!
even if the cars were right next to the damn towers (and some were almost a mile away) WHY did some parts of the cars melt and burn?
NIST has ignored this entirely as have you and your gang of pinch-headed morons.
every one of us including your now ridiculous B-UNIT posse can see for ourselves that ALL of the concrete was rendered into powder simply by observing the myriad videos and photos of 9/11.
prof. wood and others have explained in detail why the gravitational 'pancake' action does not account for this phenomena, and spooked has even composed 1 or 2 posts on this very blog concerning the phenomena of the mysterious disappearance of MUCH of the steel.
the engineering community including NIST, that you continue to pretend are the last word in integrity has not addressed this even minutely much less described the circumstances.
what the fuck is the matter with you sword of truth? and what the fuck is the matter with pinch, conspiracy smasher, james b and skyking@ as well?
until you guys actually address even a single point of contention (and there are dozens) that the 9/11 skeptical community including spooked has raised then we are left with no choice but to realize that the whole lot of you are just full of shit. so kiss my ass you lying bunch of morons!
even if the cars were right next to the damn towers (and some were almost a mile away)
PROVE IT you terrist loving scumbag.
He already did. You just aren't smart enough to figure it out, or, more likely, they pay you minimum wage to troll on blogs.
in support of the enemy..
which enemy would that be?
wave those flags with pride, especially the white part!
No, he didn't. He's shown some pictures and given his interpretation of what's in them. But he's never proven a single thing.
He refuses to because he knows it's crap.
It's been proven a long time ago. You might as well try to prove that there's no country called Mexico or that ice-cream doesn't exist.
Spend your time doing something more useful. Even if you convinced SOT, he's so dumb that it wouldn't make any difference. It's not like he can convince anyone else of anything. Your time would be better spent visiting an old-folks home.
again sword you are full of shit. you know it and we know that you know it. at least you are pretending that you have a reason for ignoring the real issues. we do realize that the real reason you continue to ignore them is because you are well aware of the fact that there is no explanation for them in the official fairytale frame-up. so again, kiss my ass the whole lot of you lying bastards.
if it has been proven, then there's nothing stopping you from showing me the proof.
as if you haven't seen the photos of said cars and total powderization of ALL concrete a hundred times already.
I've seen pictures of burned cars, but nothing to indicate that they could not have been ignited by debris from the towers.
I've seen pictures of large pieces of rubble that are neither steel nor dust. So your "total powderization" is false from the start.
so the one piece of concrete rubble that was bigger than a dust speck that you claim to have seen a photo of rules out, in your opinion, the fact that ALL of the concrete was turned to dust?
it WAS all turned to dust/powder.
you say that the cars might've been ignited by debris from the towers? what, the too-rapidly expanding clouds of concrete dust somehow ignited all those cars? there is no debris from the towers visible anywhere in those photos of burned cars. and speaking of debris, did you not see spooked's posts re: MUCH of the steel from the towers simply disappeared seemingly into thin air? do you think spooked made all of that up for his own amusement?
did you not see the firemen reports that there was hardly any debris at all, not even file cabinets or desks? where did all of THOSE go? if you haven't seen and realized for yourself all of the LACK OF EVIDENCE supporting the official fairytale and the multitude of evidence that actually indicates that something other than the official fairytale occurred by now then you have no business criticizing spooked or anyone else who actually HAS looked into all of it in depth. and if you ARE aware of all of the discrepancies that are the official fairytale and you are simply making fun of spooked and others for YOUR own amusement then you are just pathetic.
either way you are full of shit and we all know it.
you should either learn about 9/11 and discuss it like the adult that you are or shut your fool mouth and go away. the fact that you have done neither yet still criticize and ridicule as if it is WE who don't know what is going on rather than YOU after ALL THIS TIME is why you are full of shit and we all know that you know it.
Post a Comment
<< Home