Was WTC7 the "Cover-Story" for Unconventional Demolition of WTC1 and WTC2?
WTC7 serves as a beautiful official cover-story. Thus, at the official propaganda level, gov't officials could point to WTC7 and say "see-- another large steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed from structural damage and fire."
WTC7 also serves as a perfect limited hang-out for covering-up the unconventional demolition of WTC1 and WTC2. Thus, at the limited hangout propaganda level, gov't moles/disinfo agents could point to WTC7 and say "see-- this building was clearly brought down by standard controlled demolition-- that must be what happened for WTC1 and WTC2."
I think the evidence strongly supports the idea that WTC1 and WTC2 were brought down by high-tech unconventional weapons (e.g. Star Wars-type beam weapon devices), and that a major goal of the 9/11 perpetrators and their disinfo agents is to keep this covered up at all costs.
Moreover, I think it is likely that WTC7 was brought down in a more standard controlled demolition fashion-- and in a manner for EVERYONE to see-- precisely to serve as a cover-story for the WTC towers.
WTC7 also serves as a perfect limited hang-out for covering-up the unconventional demolition of WTC1 and WTC2. Thus, at the limited hangout propaganda level, gov't moles/disinfo agents could point to WTC7 and say "see-- this building was clearly brought down by standard controlled demolition-- that must be what happened for WTC1 and WTC2."
I think the evidence strongly supports the idea that WTC1 and WTC2 were brought down by high-tech unconventional weapons (e.g. Star Wars-type beam weapon devices), and that a major goal of the 9/11 perpetrators and their disinfo agents is to keep this covered up at all costs.
Moreover, I think it is likely that WTC7 was brought down in a more standard controlled demolition fashion-- and in a manner for EVERYONE to see-- precisely to serve as a cover-story for the WTC towers.
posted by spooked at 6:43 AM
8 Comments:
I agree with you on WTC 1 and 2.
Bldg 7 is kind of weird though. I think maybe some people freaked out and it didn't go down the way it was supposed to. Maybe they got worried because of all those toasted cars.
I think they correctly recognized that everyone was so traumatized and in shock that it wouldn't matter what they did next.
By the way... new video is coming along. Now let's see how long it takes for Google to ban it!
Fred
I agree WTC7 is a sideshow.
Speaking of exotic weapons, Bill O'Reilly had the chance to discredit the "movement" last night when he interviewed Kevin Barrett by bringing up "space beams" and "no planes." Curious that he did not; 911blogger would have one think that these theories are obvious disinformation the mainstream media is just itching to use .
EVERYONE knows that Death Rays from outer space are VERY likely to have caused WTC1 and 2 to fall.
EVERYONE knows that Death Rays from outer space are VERY likely to have caused WTC1 and 2 to fall.
what else can account for the many dozens of toasted up cars surrounding the wtc complex? what else can account for the fact that ALL of the concrete of wtc1&2 was turned into very fine powder? or that MUCH of the steel of wtc1&2 simply disappeared into thin air? (evaporated?) - all this in only 10 seconds for wtc2 and approx 14 seconds for wtc1? that's the ridiculous rate of 11 floors per second and approx 8 floors per second respectively.
where is NIST and all of the structural engineers to explain these phenomena? where is pinch and conspiracy smasher and sword of truth to explain these phenomena? in the absence of ANY explanation from ANY of the above mentioned masters of distraction we must assume that they are simply embarrassed to admit that they can only concede the point.
it was either death rays from above or death rays from the ground.
Sometimes I wonder if 911 was more a performance made for the benefit of other countries (allies or not) to show what our country is capable of, then in turn persuading those nations from obstructing our other objectives (Iraq, etc). I honestly believe other countries (Germany, France, Great Britian) know a lot more about the truth of 911 than Americans do.
It's certainly possible that there was a "technology proof of concept" to 911, but I think that was secondary to the "big ground war".
They could have just shown everyone a video of "bunker busting lasers" or something like that if they wanted to show off.
Also, there's another possibility to consider: airborne directed energy platforms. These actually exist (according to the Air Force's own websites) so that "doomsday plane" or "diane sawyer white elephant plane" may have zapped the scars into the towers and helped out with the attack.
You can see diane sawyer talking about that plane circling around in this video (for which i welcome feedback and suggestions)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4814742375426365649&
Fred
I recall someone writing a paper about that plane, then being threatened and removing his name for Scholars for 911 Truth I think the group was. Seems to be you can tell when people start to get close.
That's not a bad idea. It would help with the official story. They could say that the evil landlord Silverstein conspired with the terrorists. You know, he's old, too. By the time he would get through the court system anyway he might die of natural causes. So it's plausible that they would blame everything on somebody old enough not to care.
Look what happened to Ken Lay... checks out right before his life sentence and then they say his relatives get to keep all the money he stole. Very clever.
The real problem is going to be the fake opposition democrats. IF they actually decide to break up this whole criminal 911 gang, they certainly could. The question is whether or not they have the will to do so.
My guess is that they'll all just go on as if nothing is wrong, but I suppose that's a cynical view. I'd love to see them take down the whole criminal cabal.
Post a Comment
<< Home