Seven Basic Possibilities for What Happened at the South Tower
Six possibilities are described here.
The seventh possibility is that there was a more-or-less conventional plane that was able to shoot something ahead of itself to create the opening in the tower wall. One possibility is that there were pre-planted explosives in the building along the wall, and there was a trigger (electrical charge?) that sensed the plane (this could explain the entry flash seen in some videos) and helped blow the wall inwards as the plane went in-- even along the wings. Another possibility is the plane shot a beam or missile to create the entry hole (again explaining the entry flash). Either way, this conventional plane would have had to be destroyed completely by the floor slabs and columns once inside. This entry mechanism would have to be combined with video fakery to account for the discrepencies between the videos.
I tend not to like this explanation, though I can't really rule it out either. The biggest problem with the pre-planted explosives-trigger idea is that it seems like a cumbersome way of setting up the attack, and there is the technical problem of getting the right explosives along the inner walls without people not involved in the plot knowing about it. The problem with the plane shooting something ahead of itself (beam or missile) is that it is hard to see how this accounts for the wing holes or what happened to the tail. Another problem is this theory doesn't really explain why so many of the videos of the 2nd plane are fake-looking with a cartoonish plane.
The bottom line is that this explanation doesn't seem more likely than my top two possibilities (non-conventional plane + video fakery or pure video fakery).
The seventh possibility is that there was a more-or-less conventional plane that was able to shoot something ahead of itself to create the opening in the tower wall. One possibility is that there were pre-planted explosives in the building along the wall, and there was a trigger (electrical charge?) that sensed the plane (this could explain the entry flash seen in some videos) and helped blow the wall inwards as the plane went in-- even along the wings. Another possibility is the plane shot a beam or missile to create the entry hole (again explaining the entry flash). Either way, this conventional plane would have had to be destroyed completely by the floor slabs and columns once inside. This entry mechanism would have to be combined with video fakery to account for the discrepencies between the videos.
I tend not to like this explanation, though I can't really rule it out either. The biggest problem with the pre-planted explosives-trigger idea is that it seems like a cumbersome way of setting up the attack, and there is the technical problem of getting the right explosives along the inner walls without people not involved in the plot knowing about it. The problem with the plane shooting something ahead of itself (beam or missile) is that it is hard to see how this accounts for the wing holes or what happened to the tail. Another problem is this theory doesn't really explain why so many of the videos of the 2nd plane are fake-looking with a cartoonish plane.
The bottom line is that this explanation doesn't seem more likely than my top two possibilities (non-conventional plane + video fakery or pure video fakery).
6 Comments:
possibility is that there was a more-or-less conventional plane that was able to shoot something ahead of itself to create the opening in the tower wall.
that is exactly what we see in the few videos of a plane actually hitting and entering wtc2 isn't it? that weird flash just before the plane hits the tower.
if it hadn't been determined that those few images of a 767 were false then this possibility would be the most likely. IMO.
is this website still up?:
the strange images of 9/11
url= http://nineeleven2001.t35.com/
it used to have very good photos of the weird flash that both wtc planes emitted just before contact with each tower and good photos of the 'nose out' action on the back of wtc2 as well.
all i get now is a white screen.
does it work for anybody?
Sad, the site looks gone now.
I agree the "garage-door opener" theory makes some sense... but ultimately it seem impractical to me.
At this moment, i think the most likely explanation is a cruise missile or UAV that releases 2 bomblets right before it hits thus producing 3 holes. This is pretty popular technology, cluster bombs, lots of things do this. That would produce the linear "cut out" shape. x x x Then the plane image is lined up with the scar to explain to the TV audience what happened.
So, I'm going with "chopper 4 caught the approaching missile/uav on tape", and that the flash is a real thing when the warheads split off from the main vehicle. I'll go with the Naudet video's flying blob being a real, but blurry, video of the thing that hit the north tower. the second hit is probably the same thing, but with the added "shock and awe" of a giant fireball to impress the TV viewers.
Also, from what I understand, there may have been a lot of fakery done to the fireball as well, so keep that in mind. They may have edited the fireball to try to hide/explain the "nose out" mistake.
Fred
check out 911logic.blogspot.com to see how they expanded the fireball too, in an attempt to hide the "nose out" footage.
the absolute weirdest thing of all IMO is that the nose-out seen from the east actually seems to be casting a shadow. i would believe that it really was a material object if close-up photos of that side of the tower hadn't revealed that there was no hole where the thing appeared to be nosing out of. it's a shame that website is gone, that was a definitive reference for both the nose-out action with no corresponding hole and the both planes emit a flash just before hitting each tower action.
see how easy it is to lose something important on the internet?
Post a Comment
<< Home