Measuring the Flight 93 Crater Again: It's Still Too Small for a Boeing 757
Following up on the post here, this official government image also supports my previous measurements and significantly, the idea that the distance between the engine craters (or engine "scars") is too small:
(click to enlarge images)
(click to enlarge images)
posted by spooked at 11:28 AM
8 Comments:
wow the official flight93 crater still does not fit the size of the actual flight93.
plus there was no 757 debris to be found all around the official flight93 crater.
imagine everyone's surprise.
conspiracysmasher.com
there is no longer any blog registered to that name.
Over at the "D...isgusting U", one of the "lareds" used to claim that the wind actually carried one of the engines from FL 93 as "the plane" disintegrated in the sky.
Someone who has posting privileges there should ask the "lareds" whether that is still part of the Official Disinfo they're paid to post.
Sorry for the unintentional ommission of this point about the "lareds" claim: it should read "the wind carried one of the engines AWAY from where the plane (FL 93) crashed.
the official flight93 crater still does not fit the size of the actual flight93.
there was no 757 debris to be found all around the official flight93 crater.
the little puff of smoke that the "plane" made when it "crashed" and was photographed from the lying woman's kitchen window still does not line up properly with the crater when viewed on a map.
and the american people for the most part still don't want to hear about it.
here's what the NIST report had to say about the wtc:
The fuel fire burned up to 1,100 degrees C (2,000 degrees F) for perhaps 10 minutes.
that is impossible without an accelerant such as compressed oxygen ala cutting/welding torch. and even if it could, 10 mins is nothing. my fireplace burns for hours upon hours without melting
The exposed steel beams in the impact zone heated to between 700 C to 1,000 C.
oh the ghost of edna cintron begs to differ with you NIST - help me NIST, it's 2000 degrees right here where i'm standing!
in a comment on the previous post of this blog pinch accuses spooked of making things up - in fact his exact words are:
""you *do not understand things so you make shit up"".
now we see that the NIST report clearly states that:
""The exposed steel beams in the impact zone heated to between 700 C to 1,000 C.""
and we also clearly see that I was captured on video grasping hold of these very same exposed steel beams that NIST clearly stated had reached a temperature of 1000 C.
so NIST was really making shit up, not spooked.
Thank you for this post, really effective piece of writing.
Post a Comment
<< Home