The Port Chicago Explosion
What an amazing and tragic story.
In 1944, in the San Francisco Bay, a 7000 ton ship was completely annihilated along with hundreds of men-- most likely by a nuclear explosion.
In 1944, in the San Francisco Bay, a 7000 ton ship was completely annihilated along with hundreds of men-- most likely by a nuclear explosion.
posted by spooked at 4:22 PM
6 Comments:
Further down in the article is the smoking gun:
"A Freedom of Information Act request case filed by Greenpeace in 1996 showed that over 10,000 people, fully a third of the residents of the area, died of a radiation poisoning, a type specific to that which would be dispersed by an early-model nuclear device. Future president George W. Bush, at the time in 1944 two years away from being born, is accused of covering up this heinous crime."
Wow! I didn't know that so many people died of radiation poisoning since it was "...most likely...a nuclear explosion." How could Chimpy McHiltler cover THAT up??
Wait....NOBODY died of any radiation poisoning!????
Ya think (???) there would have been massive radiation deaths over the subsequent years from a nuclear blast? Especially those black ammunition loaders? NO evidence of radiation poisoning, much less deaths, from this supposed nuclear detonation.
I swear, you have got to be the most gullible human on this earth - honestly, you'll believe and post ANYTHING, as long as it makes the government or the US or Bush look bad.
Anything. Regardless how stupid it sounds or hwo impossible it is.
And you are a "scientist".
and those sailors who didn't perish refused to work anymore because of the unsafe conditions, and as a result, the navy branded them at mutineers. and about 50 years later, clinton pardoned one of the mutineers who was still alive.
dave emory did a lecture on this topic.. which i cannot find an audio link to, but if anyone really wanted it, i could dig up a link.
"Contra Costa county, where the explosion occurred, had an unusual cancer rate, according to a March 28, 1982 New York Times article."
Radiation would not have been measured at the time of the blast-- at least not publicly, people knew little.
Some recent radiation measurements here:
http://ian.kluft.com/pc44/
In summary, there is some increased background radiation inthe area, 60 years later.
This article discusses the radiation extensively:
http://sonic.net/sentinel/usa4.html
Proof that the fucktards believe almost ANY theory....
Anonymous 5:05 PM, I can't find your quote:
"A Freedom of Information Act request case filed by Greenpeace in 1996 showed that over 10,000 people, fully a third of the residents of the area, died of a radiation poisoning, a type specific to that which would be dispersed by an early-model nuclear device."
anywhere in the linked Nexus article... Where did it come from?
Inquiring:
You are a dumb shit who can't recognize satire when you see it.
This is indeed the webpage for you.
Post a Comment
<< Home