Humint Events Online: Tesla Invented a "Directed Energy Weapon"

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Tesla Invented a "Directed Energy Weapon"

Hmm, I wonder what REALLY happened with this:
Directed-energy weapon
“ I have not thought it hazardous to predict, that wars in the future will be waged by electrical means. ”
—Nikola Tesla, 1915, [58]

Later in life, Tesla made some remarkable claims concerning a "teleforce" weapon[59] The press called it a "peace ray" or death ray.[60][61] In total, the components and methods included:[62][63]

--An apparatus for producing manifestations of energy in free air instead of in a high vacuum as in the past. This, according to Tesla in 1934, was accomplished.

--A mechanism for generating tremendous electrical force. This, according to Tesla, was also accomplished.

--A means of intensifying and amplifying the force developed by the second mechanism.

--A new method for producing a tremendous electrical repelling force. This would be the projector, or gun, of the invention.

Tesla worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon between the early 1900s till the time of his death. In 1937, Tesla composed a treatise entitled "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media" concerning charged particle beams.[64] Tesla published the document in an attempt to expound on the technical description of a "superweapon that would put an end to all war". This treatise of the particle beam is currently in the Nikola Tesla Museum archive in Belgrade. It described an open ended vacuum tube with a gas jet seal that allowed particles to exit, a method of charging particles to millions of volts, and a method of creating and directing nondispersive particle streams (through electrostatic repulsion).[65]

Records of his indicate that it was based on a narrow stream of atomic clusters of liquid mercury or tungsten accelerated via high voltage (by means akin to his magnifying transformer). Tesla gave the following description concerning the particle gun's operation:

“ [The nozzle would] send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 200 miles from a defending nation's border and will cause armies to drop dead in their tracks.[66] ”


The weapon could be used against ground based infantry or for antiaircraft purposes.[67]

Tesla tried to interest the US War Department in the device.[68] He also offered this invention to European countries.[69] None of the governments purchased a contract to build the device. He was unable to act on his plans.[70]

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

..."that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 200 miles from a defending nation's border and will cause armies to drop dead in their tracks..."

Sure Spooky....suuuuuure.

Time to up your meds, methinks.

Up yours!

lolol

10:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Early!

Have you checked on my direct deposit yet for my Shill Pay? I still haven.t seen it in there. If you could get on that post-haste-ipso-facto-e-pluribus-unum, I'd really appreciate it!

Thanks, buddy! I have some surveillence equipment I need to pay for up front and well, you know these gubmint and purchase orders!

11:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lt. Colonel Tom Bearden wrote a book on Tesla's technology...the Russians used his ideas to develop the early Scalar weapons (after WW2), that was over 50 years ago...imagine what kinds of directed energy weapons must exist NOW--the kind that can vaporize skycrapers perhaps, and turn cars into jellified twisted metal?
http://www.cheniere.org/books/part1/teslaweapons.htm

2:19 PM  
Anonymous conspiracy smasher! said...

how dare point out that tesla was working on directed high energy weapons as far back as 1934!
you had better up your meds for pointing that out!
*lol!*

2:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This shows - yet again - just how stupid and gullible you fools are.

Whatever "scalar" weapons the Soviets developed (only an uninformed idiot woudl call use the term "Russians") they sure did amount to a whole lot since they used them in every exported "Worker's revolution" war that we saw over the following 60 years.

Wait...the Soviets never *used* any "scalar" weapons over those years? None in WW2 against the hated Germans? None in Angola? None in Cuba? None in Congo? None in other areas of Eastern Europe? None in Vietnam? What? No evidence of "scalar weapon" use? Ya THINK the Soviets would have used them if they had them? Ya THINK if they amounted to anything we would have seen them used in an invasion of western Europe?? Perhaps these "scalar weapons" are on a par with the Laser El-Destructo Steel-Liquifying zapper beam - no evidence *at all* that these exist other than in your feaverish minds.

What's up next? The aliens hidden by J Allen Hynek and how they helped the French make cheese?

3:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

*Ya**THINK*? *lol*!

4:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i *wonder* why none of you morons ever comment on the impossible physics exhibited in CNN's ua175 entering the wtc2 like a ghost.

4:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What imposible physics? Do you understand the relationship between aerodynamics, fluid mechanics, plasticity and the concepts of potential energy, kinetic energy and speed?

Get back to me when you have an answer.

5:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"" Do you understand the relationship between aerodynamics, fluid mechanics, plasticity and the concepts of potential energy, kinetic energy and speed?""

yes i do understand these relationships, and what we see in the CNN clip, park foreman clip, cheney clip and fairbanks clip, all 4 of which depict a different somewhat 767-like plane slipping thru the side of wtc2 like a ghost, ALL defy the laws of physics including your clever little list of relationships.

i think that it is YOU who needs get back to ME when YOU can even BEGIN to explain how what we see in these 4 videos captured for posterity does not defy the laws of physics including your stupid list.

plasticity? idiot!

7:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

bird vs. plane = OOPS!

wtc hardened steel box columns

plasticity!!??
*LOL*

8:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hi pinch!

11:39 PM  
Anonymous www.lerida-3d.com said...

Quite useful data, thank you for this article.

3:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger