Evil Controllers
Increasingly I wonder if this is the only way to make sense of the Bush presidency and the last six and a half years.
The Vietnam War, as monstrously fucked up as it was, actually made some sense in the context of the Cold War.
The Iraq War really never made any sense from beginning to present in the context of "the war on terror". The only possible purpose I can make sense of this horrible mess is that the plan for Iraq was never to try to stop terrorism-- rather the plan actually was to spread terrorism and make new terrorists. It wasn't simply about money, because there are lots of ways to make money for the controllers. Even the control of Iraqi oil never made sense for what they did. But if the goal was actually to MAKE new terrorists, then the war makes some sense. Interestingly, the evil controllers did such a brilliant job that it really doesn't matter if the US stays in Iraq or leaves in the near future-- either way, the place is a perfect "al-CIA-duh" training ground.
Unlike al-CIA-duh Version 1.5 (the ones that "brought us" 9/11), I can envision that al-CIA-duh Version 2.0 (made in Iraq) is really the master entity that will carry out new horrible, unspeakable terror attacks that will eventually lead to a true global police state.
A global police state at this stage of human development makes sense as an evil master plan-- the evil controllers essentially have all the technology that they need. The global police state would be essential for the enactment of the evil controllers' final solution.
I should say that this global police state is not a foregone conclusion by any means-- it depends how much normal humans wake up and try to resist the controllers.
I do of course have some ideas about the evil controllers and their goals-- these are subjects that have been discussed here of late, particularly by "anonymous physicist".
I'm NOT saying this is the only explanation for what is happening-- but it is the explanation that fits many otherwise inexplicable facets of the grand scheme of things.
The Vietnam War, as monstrously fucked up as it was, actually made some sense in the context of the Cold War.
The Iraq War really never made any sense from beginning to present in the context of "the war on terror". The only possible purpose I can make sense of this horrible mess is that the plan for Iraq was never to try to stop terrorism-- rather the plan actually was to spread terrorism and make new terrorists. It wasn't simply about money, because there are lots of ways to make money for the controllers. Even the control of Iraqi oil never made sense for what they did. But if the goal was actually to MAKE new terrorists, then the war makes some sense. Interestingly, the evil controllers did such a brilliant job that it really doesn't matter if the US stays in Iraq or leaves in the near future-- either way, the place is a perfect "al-CIA-duh" training ground.
Unlike al-CIA-duh Version 1.5 (the ones that "brought us" 9/11), I can envision that al-CIA-duh Version 2.0 (made in Iraq) is really the master entity that will carry out new horrible, unspeakable terror attacks that will eventually lead to a true global police state.
A global police state at this stage of human development makes sense as an evil master plan-- the evil controllers essentially have all the technology that they need. The global police state would be essential for the enactment of the evil controllers' final solution.
I should say that this global police state is not a foregone conclusion by any means-- it depends how much normal humans wake up and try to resist the controllers.
I do of course have some ideas about the evil controllers and their goals-- these are subjects that have been discussed here of late, particularly by "anonymous physicist".
I'm NOT saying this is the only explanation for what is happening-- but it is the explanation that fits many otherwise inexplicable facets of the grand scheme of things.
posted by spooked at 12:17 PM
2 Comments:
"Evil controllers"
Is that anything like "Bad Zoot".
Bad, bad Zoot.
Evil, evil controllers.
I think it boils down to the "war on terror" being a thinly-veiled war for control over as much oil and natural gas resources remaining as possible. It's all layed out in the P.N.A.C.'s thesis "Rebuilding America's Defenses" in very broad terms, and certainly in much more specific terms if we could get our hands on Cock Cheney's documents regarding the "Energy Task Force" of summer 2001. That right there probably sets out the blueprint for their wars for resource dominance. Since it's a matter of public record already that the Cheney regime's energy policy was basically written by the oil barons, I wonder why the documents regarding the Energy Task Force are still classified? Could it be because it will very quickly unravel their "war on terror" farce?
Post a Comment
<< Home