DEW Expert Doug Beason
from Judy Wood's site:
He is indeed Director of Threat Reduction at Los Alamos.
"Threat reduction" sounds a bit like "counter-intelligence" to me.
This guy sounds like a DEW-version of Steven Jones to me.
Why should we trust anything about what he says about DEW and their possible use at the WTC?
DR. J. DOUGLAS BEASON, Col. (USAF, ret.), a key architect and leading expert of directed-energy research for the past twenty-six years, holds a Ph.D. in laser-technology physics. He has served at the White House, working for the President's Science Advisor in both the Clinton and Bush administrations. Today he is on the Board of Directors of the Directed Energy Professional Society, and at Los Alamos National Laboratory he is Director of Threat Reduction. Dr. Beason is the author of twelve books, including some popular fiction techno-thrillers, and over one hundred scholarly papers and other works. He is a Fellow of the prestigious American Physical Society.
He is indeed Director of Threat Reduction at Los Alamos.
"Threat reduction" sounds a bit like "counter-intelligence" to me.
This guy sounds like a DEW-version of Steven Jones to me.
Why should we trust anything about what he says about DEW and their possible use at the WTC?
posted by spooked at 8:26 AM
6 Comments:
And why are they now arresting people just for observing what they are doing there now?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/08/bridge.collapse/
What don't they want people to know?
When our monstruous observers--see how they are now using U2 jets to spy on Americans--
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/US_turns_U2_spy_planes_on_0809.html
do not wish to be observed themselves, it is bad.
Well, considering he has said zero about DEW at WTC, your question is null.
In that he tries to play down the current capacities of DEW; we should indeed be skeptical and assume they are well advanced beyond what he admits.
Hope this helps.
everything is most likely well advanced beyond what is admitted, directed energy weapons included.
still there is much evidence of nukes being deployed at wtc while evidence of DEW remains speculation at best.
"Well, considering he has said zero about DEW at WTC, your question is null."
I don't think that is true, unless you mean he hasn't said anything that can be easily referenced online.
Why does Wood have him on her site apparently in a supporting manner?
Wood's site caters to educated and auto-didactic people.
I imagine the intent is that those curious and capable of learning will listen to the information and process it accordingly.
For the incurious and ineducable, the point is somewhat lost, I suppose.
Post a Comment
<< Home