More Proof of Molten Steel at Ground Zero
The Structural Engineer journal:
Dr. Eaton is Keith Eaton, PhD structural engineer and Chief Executive & Secretary of The Institution of Structural Engineers.
Anonymous Physicist points out:
Dr Eaton said: ‘We were given a fascinating insight into what had been happening at the site. Our hosts, under the firm’s principal engineer George Tamaro (F), had been constantly involved at Ground Zero for several months. They had been called in as foundation engineers within a week of 11 September, and had spent several months examining the stability of the debris and the diaphragm wall all around the site, commonly known as the “bathtub” They had been key individuals in advising on the excavation of the site, with a great deal of care being needed before debris could be removed in order to maintain the stability of the original slurry walls.
‘They showed us many fascinating slides’ he continued, ‘ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster’.
Dr. Eaton is Keith Eaton, PhD structural engineer and Chief Executive & Secretary of The Institution of Structural Engineers.
Anonymous Physicist points out:
The above is impeccable proof that they have photos of molten metal, but not for the public. Of course Eaton would not have been shown the most damaging things FEMA has!
The DEW-huggers who proclaim "No MOLTEN METAL" because their DEW "theory" doesn't allow for it, need to drop the DEW, and acknowledge the actual WTC destruction mechanism and aftermath. Despite heavy fascist control, the unstoppable truth has seeped out:"
Likewise the official theory is also completely shot down by this revelation/proof of the existence of photos of molten metal. For the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) absolutely disallows any molten metal weeks later. This is why this lying NIST/911 Commission chief engineer must say there was no molten metal.
posted by spooked at 5:28 PM
6 Comments:
This reminds me of the "secret photos" Popular Mechanics claimed to see which proved their was a plane at the Pentagon. Similar op, just one level of complexity deeper down the rabbit hole.
You are clearly the op here.
Your slip is showing, trying to link the NPT with the DEW DEW. That's been outed already--just like you.
""Similar op, just one level of complexity deeper down the rabbit hole""
so. not only claiming, but actually showing how and why nukes were used to destroy the wtc complex is considered to be "going down the rabbit hole"?
i think that going down the rabbit hole more likely involves the insistance that some kind of "orbitally based solar powered microwave ray beam" or whatever was responsible.
the fact that a real plane could not even begin to penetrate a wtc has nothing to do with any of this.
Good points, 7:57.
Yeah, "Total" has said it's solar powered, then its cold fusion powered (both weak energy sources). First, it's in orbit, then it's on a helicopter, but no wait, it's just lurking around the WTC for months, and pops up whenever a reason for melting a fireman's boot is needed, or when some molten steel is seen flowing--THERE IT IS--It's SUPER DEW (DEW).
Total must be paid by the pound of B.S.
You've wasted your money again, CIA. This one is not any smarter than the others, though it can throw out bigger words occasionally.
even if elements within the CIA are the Perps, i think at least 95% of the Agency has NO CLUE about it, let alone do they suspect "inside job"...you don't get those kinds of Fed-Spook-Shill jobs without being extremely patriotic/pro-US...the Perps are the dark shadow of business, media, intelligence, and the military...
It is possible for two or more different people to fire different weapons at the same target. Cf. John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Tuning forks continue to resonate after the kinetic energy has already been applied.
Hope this helps.
Post a Comment
<< Home