I-35W Conspiracy?
The problem is that nowadays, no one can really be sure WHAT the "powers that be" are up to, and one cannot reasonably put ANYTHING past them.
In any case, the bridge did go down rather uniformly, and looking at the under-structure, there are obvious weak points that could have been easily blown.
In any case, the bridge did go down rather uniformly, and looking at the under-structure, there are obvious weak points that could have been easily blown.
posted by spooked at 2:31 PM
7 Comments:
Of course!
Tell me, Spooky. When your toilet gets backed up from too much shit, do you blame it on the government and George Bush, too?
Thank you Spooked. That possibility should be looked into. See this cnn page.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/03/bridge.collapse/index.html
"Patterson said she heard a loud explosion and turned around, thinking it was construction or dynamite testing..."
Then I saw the very first article, seems to have diappeared from the net now, said the bridge was inspected and passed, just a few weeks prior to "collapse." These engineers know their stuff and do routinely shut down bridges whent heir tests show danger. While the bridge was old, the inspection was very recent!
The video of actual "collapse" does show that both ends break at the same time. And that Dr. Sauder notes that this is highly improbable. This makes sense. If there is a defect at one spot, it would "rupture" and the bridge would start to break away at that point. Only later would the other end break too. But ehe both ends break at the same exact time in the same exact way, and amount, sure looks fishy to me now!
This one's not closed in my eyes now. Thanks Spooked.
""The video of actual "collapse" does show that both ends break at the same time. And that Dr. Sauder notes that this is highly improbable.""
Good post Spooked.
I found this youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpnbQaI7F10&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eabovetopsecret%2Ecom%2Fforum%2Fthread294891%2Fpg1
Listen carefully to eyewitness, Joe Costello, describe first seeing a plume of smoke shoot up rapidly 100-200 feet. He says THEN the bridge collapsed!! Would a structural defect rupturing on he bridge cause such a shooting up of smoke?
I agree with 4:20 above. The perfect symmetry of both ends "collapsing" simultaneously, and in the same needed way smacks of C.D. Perfect symmetry like WTC7.
I.e., FAR TOO PERFECT SYMMETRY...
Finally, note that the eyewitness, Joe Costello, says it was a RAPID shooting up of the plume of smoke!
I will call this finding... BOTH THE SMOKING GUN AND THE SMOKING BRIDGE!
Anonymous Physicist
I was watching some of the footage and this one "eyewitness" seemed really staged to me, Kevin O'Connor, so I googled him and got this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070711/20070711005644.html?.v=1
"I welcome the insight and perspective that Patty brings to NRG," said Kevin O'Connor, Public Affairs Principal
Natural Resource Group, LLC
Since it's inception in 1992, NRG has offered a wide-range of services that support the energy industry. In 2004, the firm recognized the demands on our clients pertaining to stakeholder involvement and communications on their energy projects and chose to expand their services by adding a full spectrum of Public Affairs offerings. " (It's in Minneapolis, too, so it's the same guy)
hmmmmmmmmmm,
Mirandapriestly
What's your point?
1, You don't say what O'Connor said that you didn't like.
2. What you have above is not the most damaging thing a person could have on their record.
3. What does this have to do with Joe Costello?
So what's the motive? Who benefits?
If, and I'm only saying if it was a demolition,
then somebody could have blown the bridge to get an insurance payout, or to get funding to build a replacement. After all, it worked so well on 9/11 that it would only be natural for the technique to evolve, like any other scam.
It might be interesting to find out who gets those insurance payments and who gets the rebuilding contract.
Post a Comment
<< Home