Humint Events Online: Good Summary of Nuke Demolition Evidence

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Good Summary of Nuke Demolition Evidence

Top Ten Reasons to Suspect the Twin Towers were Nuked:

1. Speed, thoroughness, and destructiveness of the demolitions
2. Disappearance of vast amounts of construction steel
3. Mushroom-like dust clouds accompanying the demolitions
4. Steel vaporization and condensation into dust particles
5. Cancers, low birth rates, and other signs of radiation poisoning
6. Lingering hotspots and fires in the basements
7. Cloak-and-dagger cleanup operation
8. Complete disappearance of building contents
9. Complete pulverization of above-grade concrete
10. Elevated radiation detected at Fresh Kills landfill

Ten Additional reasons:
1. Survivors' tales of nuclear blast-like noise, heat, and force.
2. 60-year history of US nuclear weapons labs and investments in nuclear weaponry.
3. Failure of 1993 bombs to produce significant damage.
4. Close ties between WH and asbestos industry.
5. Photographs of disintegrating steel during demolitions.
6. US Military use of DU weaponry.
7. WH Warnings of black market and suitcase nukes, non-state players, etc.
8. US development of tactical demolition nuclear devices.
9. EPA/CDC won't release 911 radiation readings.
10. Dr. Jones's well-funded propaganda campaign.

(from here)

Another brief list of nuke evidence compiled by Anonymous Physicist is here.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good post Spooked.

And my hat's off to "LuPeRcALiO" at that forum for posting the truth of the nuking of the WTC on 9/11. Much credit to him for tolerating the obvious regime agents/shills desperately "countering" him with the usual lies.

My nuke evidence is at

My other, nuclear-atermath, China Syndrome, related articles are here

One important thing though. I hope that some day, honest researchers will stop saying "lingering heat" and start saying--what actually occurred--GENERATED HEAT, namely the China Syndrome as I have described it in my articles.

I don't believe you can have the molten metal both eyewitnessed by firefighters and even reported on in a gov't newsletter [see my archived articles above], SIX MONTHS after 9/11 via "lingering heat", only a source of GENERATING HEAT does that. And conventional fires can't last anywhere's near that long; even the nuclear bombs of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Trinity site etc., cooled off shortly after detonation. The conventional fires started by the nuclear bombs dropped on Japanese cities also lasted only hours or a few days at most.

The high surface heat throughout the WTC --melted firemen's boots--for weeks after 9/11; and the molten metal for months below the surface were from the radioactive nuclear fragments, as I have described, likely from the emplacement of redundant nukes--S.O.P. (standard operating procedure), and the sequelae I have described.

Saying "lingering heat" gives fodder to the DEW and OCT crowds (who have the same intel supervisors), who will then simply say that it is impossible for heat to linger that long, and the eyewitnesses are all lying or mistaken.

And never forget, from my articles, some of the best proof of radiation, from nukes, also comes from the survivors having burnt and/or hanging skin after feeling great heat--WITHOUT ANY FIRE--on their skin at the time of the destruction (nuking). And the teeth falling out later from responders--a common result months or years later from radiation exposure. Along with the rare (but common from radiation exposure) thyroid/blood/lymph cancers, the hanging skin and teeth falling out show a consistent picture of radiation victims from the nuking of the WTC on 9/11 and the China Syndrome aftermath of radiation exposure to the over 40,000 WTC responders.

Hopefully, one day, 911 researchers will start saying "heat generation" up to SIX months later--until it was carted away.

LuPeRcALiO, keep fighting the good fight, compadre.

Anonymous Physicist

2:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My article demonstrating that the best (thermobaric/FAE) explosives could not have done 9/11 is at:

Anonymous Physicist

3:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger