NIST Caught With Their Pants Down
I want to highlight this quote from the letter:
See? Even if you spot them their bogus collapse initiation mechanism, try to swallow their next leap of logic. To NIST, it had to be a collapse because it was "clear" that the building was unable to resist the falling mass of the upper stories!
Talk about circular reasoning! They say it had to be a collapse because the lower floors simply couldn't resist the upper floors falling!
Of course the whole point that skeptics of the official story make is that there was minimal resistance from the lower floors because the lowers floors were blown away by explosives!
How would someone see if explosives were used? Check for explosive residue.
Did they check for explosive residue?
No, because it might not have been conclusive.
Well, lots and lots of tests are down without knowing for sure if the results will be conclusive. Jeesh.
But here is the real kicker:
They can't explain the collapses.
It is TIME to ring the gong on these shameless shills!!!