Humint Events Online: NIST Caught With Their Pants Down

Thursday, October 18, 2007

NIST Caught With Their Pants Down

The NIST response to various 9/11 researchers can be downloaded here.

I want to highlight this quote from the letter:



See? Even if you spot them their bogus collapse initiation mechanism, try to swallow their next leap of logic. To NIST, it had to be a collapse because it was "clear" that the building was unable to resist the falling mass of the upper stories!

Talk about circular reasoning! They say it had to be a collapse because the lower floors simply couldn't resist the upper floors falling!

Of course the whole point that skeptics of the official story make is that there was minimal resistance from the lower floors because the lowers floors were blown away by explosives!

How would someone see if explosives were used? Check for explosive residue.

Did they check for explosive residue?

No, because it might not have been conclusive.

Well, lots and lots of tests are down without knowing for sure if the results will be conclusive. Jeesh.

But here is the real kicker:



They can't explain the collapses.

It is TIME to ring the gong on these shameless shills!!!

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you read the actual letter and not just the part of that one sentence you quote, you will find that what NIST is talking about is the goal of their report, and the difficulty in making a detailed computer modeling of the full collapse.

It is not, in fact suggesting that the total collapse was anomalous or unexpected, or supporting the controlled demolition theory in any way, implicit or otherwise

12:48 PM  
Blogger spooked said...

What are you, a NIST lawyer?

Love that "in any way, implicit or otherwise" clause.

I read the full letter and of course I did quote more than one sentence.

OF COURSE, NIST are not suggesting that the "total collapse was anomalous or unexpected, or supporting the controlled demolition theory in any way, implicit or otherwise"-- they are official shills!

But nonetheless, a very reasonable interpretation of what they say is that since they cannot model the collapse, how do they know their initiation of collapse mechanism will lead to collapse in the rapid and complete manner that was seen on 9/11?

This like me saying I can create life in a test tube from simple chemicals, because I can zap a mixture of different simple compounds with an electric current and get a few bases of DNA.

1:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this from the chicken wide model builder....

3:53 PM  
Anonymous Jim said...

When it comes to shills, isn't it funny how words never mean what they say (i.e. NIST, Silverstein, etc.).

12:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger