Zdenek P. Bazant: Alpha Shill for the Official WTC Collapse Story-- Part III
In this paper, "Collapse of World Trade Center Towers:
What Did and Did Not Cause It?" by Zdenek P. Bazant, Jia-Liang Le, Frank R. Greening and David B. Benson, they write:
What Did and Did Not Cause It?" by Zdenek P. Bazant, Jia-Liang Le, Frank R. Greening and David B. Benson, they write:
Although, due to absence of experimental crushing data for the lightweight concrete used, the theory of comminution cannot predict the size range of pulverized concrete particles, it is shown that the observed size range (0.01 mm – 0.1 mm) is fully consistent with this theory and is achievable by collapse driven gravity alone, and that only about 7% of the total gravitational energy converted to kinetic energy of impacts would have sufficed to pulverize all the concrete slabs and core walls (while at least 158 tons of TNT per tower, installed into many small holes drilled into each concrete floor slab and core wall, would have been needed to produce the same degree of pulverization).I will unpack their calculations in a post in the near future, but just as a prelude to that, who HONESTLY believes their conclusion (in italics) is possible?
posted by spooked at 10:52 AM
4 Comments:
ha ha david b. benson!
i remember a few years ago on a different blog when he claimed to be a professor of computer science yet had to repeatedly be shown how to make a simple HTML link.
one time he said. "oh i think my copy/paste is broken".
then he said, "i don't know very much about 9/11".
2 months later he was the editor of "journal of 911 debunking" or some nonsense.
as if!
hey david benson, go make a bicycle powered search engine out of coconuts!
Look at those calculations!
Smoke and mirrors, as not one of them takes into account that the towers did not *collapse*, but rather exploded, as anyone with eyes in their head can discern for themselves.
if the official 9/11 fairytale had any merit whatsoever then they would jump at the chance to prove it and not only silence the skeptics once and for all, but
rub our noses in it as well.
if it wasn't so serious an issue then it would actually be comical that said official fairytale's "calculations" can be refuted by a simple photo of a wtc being disintegrated.
the fact that they refuse to rise to the challenge is very telling all by itself.
I will unpack their calculations in a post tomorrow, but just as a prelude to that, who HONESTLY believes their conclusion (in italics) is possible?
You mean aside from the entire scientific community (something you and A.P are not a part of)?
Post a Comment
<< Home