"No Planers" Are Stupid
posted by spooked at 6:15 PM
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Previous Posts
- The Coming Economic Meltdown and Some Advice
- Definitions of Fascism
- In All Likelihood, Hillary Is the Next President
- Firefighter: Giuliani 'ran like a coward on 9/11'
- Wheeee! Free Money!
- It's All About the Nukes
- New Hampshire Recount Update
- The American Empire Seems Poised for Collapse
- Reality and the Purdue Cartoon
- I Am Not Going to Blame All the Troubles of the US...
Recommended Reading
- The "Ultimate List" of Improbabilities and Coincidences Around 9/11
- Manifesto for All Present and Future Military Personnel
- The Nine Circles of Conspiracy
- Ultimate Truths (Deep Conspiracy)
- Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
- China Syndrome at the WTC
- Dead 9/11 Whistleblowers
- Bogus Official 9/11 Science
- Anonymous Physicist's book site
- 120 Reasons for the No-Plane Theory
- People Who Should Have Seen UA175 Hit the South Tower But Didn't
- 9/11: All Roads Lead to MIHOP
- 9/11: Possible Versus Impossible
- Ghost Gun UA175
- Morgan Reynolds, We Have Holes
- Hunt the Boeing, Shanksville Edition
- Hunt the Boeing, WTC2 Edition
- The No Planes Evidence Kit
- Why Don't More Engineers Question the WTC Collapses?
- Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC
- The Problem with the 9/11 "Truth" Movement
- Brainwashed, In Deep Denial, A Government Shill, Or Some Combination of the Three
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv blog
- International Center for 9/11 Studies - NIST Cumulus Video Database
- 9/11 "U"
- Killtown's Overview Site
- Killtown's 9/11 Smoking Guns
- Killtown's 2nd Hit Video Compilation
- Killtown's NIST figure gallery
- Morgan Reynolds
- The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites
- Ace Baker
- Killtown's Blog
- Genghis' 911 Taboo
- Ningen's Blog
- 9/11 Truthlings Watch
- Judy Wood's 9/11 site (focuses on WTC demolition)
- 9/11 Logic
Interesting and/or Useful 9/11 Sites
Archives
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- March 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- November 2015
- December 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- March 2016
- April 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- August 2016
- September 2016
- October 2016
- November 2016
- December 2016
- January 2017
- February 2017
- March 2017
- April 2017
- May 2017
- June 2017
- July 2017
- August 2017
- September 2017
- October 2017
- November 2017
- December 2017
- January 2018
- February 2018
- March 2018
- April 2018
- May 2018
- June 2018
- July 2018
- August 2018
- September 2018
- October 2018
- November 2018
- December 2018
- January 2019
- February 2019
- March 2019
- April 2019
- May 2019
- June 2019
- July 2019
- August 2019
- September 2019
- October 2019
- November 2019
- December 2019
- January 2020
- February 2020
- March 2020
- April 2020
- May 2020
- June 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- September 2020
- October 2020
- November 2020
- December 2020
- January 2021
- February 2021
- March 2021
- April 2021
- May 2021
- June 2021
- July 2021
- August 2021
- September 2021
- October 2021
- November 2021
- December 2021
- January 2022
- February 2022
- March 2022
- April 2022
- May 2022
- June 2022
- July 2022
- August 2022
- September 2022
- October 2022
- November 2022
- December 2022
- January 2023
- February 2023
- March 2023
- April 2023
- May 2023
- June 2023
- July 2023
- August 2023
- September 2023
- October 2023
- November 2023
- January 2024
- February 2024
- March 2024
- April 2024
- May 2024
- June 2024
- July 2024
- August 2024
- September 2024
- October 2024
- November 2024
- December 2024
- January 2100
My Other Blogs
- WTC Demolition
- WTC China Syndrome
- 33 Watch
- Al-CIA-duh
- Ghost Plane
- Flight 93 Hoax
- Pentagon Hit
- The AIG Scam
- THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
- Bush Administration War Criminals
- Fake Opposition Democrats
Some of My Findings Regarding the Attack on the WTC South Tower
- Summary of Evidence for No Plane at the South Tower
- Clearest Evidence of Conflicting Plane Paths in Two Different 2nd Hit Videos
- Freak Plane
- The Curious Plane in the "Live" Video
- Too Small of a Plane in Both "Live" 2nd Hit Videos
- Mutant Tail Section on UA175
- Evidence of 2nd Hit Video Fakery
- Proof that the engine part at Church and Murray Street is not from UA175, a Boeing 767
- 9/11 Blimp
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
- 9/11 Complicity
- Conspicuous Plot
- Conspiracy Smasher!!!
- 9/11 Cover-Up
- 9/11 Encyclopedia
- 9/11 Exposed
- 9/11 Foreknowledge
- 9/11 Hoax
- 9/11 Oddities
- 9/11 Overview
- 9/11 Oz (Australian)
- 9/11 Plot
- 9/11 Proof
- 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
- 9/11 Resources
- 9/11 Review.org
- 9/11 Review.com
- 9/11 Stealth
- 9/11 Strike
- 9/11 "U"
- 9/11 Verses
- Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson)
- Finnish 9/11 Site
- Finnish 9/11 Site in English
- German Engineers 9/11 site
- Hybrideb's 9/11 site
- Icelandic 9/11 site
- Jane Doe's 9/11 site
- Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
- Portland Indy Media 9/11
- 119 Questions about 9/11
- Let's Roll 9/11
- Nerdcities 9/11
- Patriots Question 9/11
- RINF 9/11 Archive
- The Mysteries of 9/11
- Shunned
- Physics 911
- Plague Puppy's Cafe
- Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
- Question 911
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
- Steven Warran
- Stop the Lie 9/11
- Unanswered Questions
- Questions Questions
- The Web Fairy
- Wing TV
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Citizens' Court
- 9/11 Citizens' Watch
- 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
- 911 Truth.org
- 911 Truth LA.us
- 911 Truth LA.org
- 911 Truth Emergence
- 911 We Know
- 911 Truth Movement Musings
- 9-11 Visibility Project
- 9-11 UK
- 9/11 Family Steering Committee
- NY 9/11 Truth
- San Francisco 9/11 Truth
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Community Currency 9/11
- Summer of Truth
- Proposition 911
- Reopen 911
- Deception Dollars
- Justice for 9/11
- Team 8 Plus
- Flight 93 Hoax
- WTC Demolition
- The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
- 9/11 Photo Analysis
- Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
- Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC
- 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse
- WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
- Flight 77 FOIA site
- Flight 93 Crash.com
- Pentagon Research
- Brad's Pentagon Analysis
- 9/11 chronology (network footage)
- Buddy Buddy
- Pentagon Strike
- 911 Questions
- FKN News
- Rigorous Intuition v2.0
- Wing TV
- Xymphora
- The Bulldog Manifesto
- Center for an Informed America
- George Washington
- Centre for Research on Globalization
- Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
- Daily Two Minutes of Hate
- The Emperor's New Clothes
- Public Action (Carol Valentine)
- Propaganda Matrix
- Daniel Hopsicker
- What Really Happened
- From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
- Arctic Beacon
- Cryptome
- Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News
- Break for News
- Tom Flocco
- Rense
- "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin
- "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin
- 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall
- "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley
- "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson
- "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert
- "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker
- Pig Lipstick
- Weazl's Revenge
- Alex Constantine
- Buzzflash
- The Raw Story
- Democratic Underground
- Progressive Independent
- Think Progress
- Citizens for a Legitimate Government
- Common Dreams
- Consortium News
- Center for Cooperative Research
- Cursor
- Guerrilla News
- Online Journal
- The Memory Hole
- Information Clearing House
- Press Action
- News from Babylon
- Unknown News
- TV News Lies
- After Downing Street
- Eschaton
- Glenn Greenwald (old blog))
- Daily Kos
- Talking Points Memo
- Hullabaloo
- The Brad Blog
- Jesus' General
- The Rude Pundit
- The Poor Man
- Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
- Today in Iraq
- Antiwar.com
- Iraq Coalition Casualties
- Clusterfuck Nation
- Donkey Rising
- Salon
- Slate
- The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas
- The Oil Drum
- Land of Black Gold
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Richard Heinberg
- Grist
- 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
- I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.
More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide variety of 9/11 sites here for the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to you to judge their content.)
General 9/11 Sites
9/11 Activism
9/11 Specialty Sites
Sites that question 9/11 (who views on 9/11 may differ greatly from those presented here)
Good Intro Books to Alternative 9/11 Truth
Blogs, News Sites and Miscellaneous Links
23 Comments:
Wow. I guess Aero-planes really DO disintegrate (as well as many little bits falling off) when they strike hard, solid objects.
Just not on 9/11/01 though...
Of course No Planers are stupid!
Imagine thinking that a fragile aluminum tube could not punch directly through a wall of giant steel columns!
"disintegrate"
The robShill needs a dictionary.
implying that rob is a shill?
almost well done 10:37!
I'm not quite sure how one can compare a plane that jumped its chocks during an engine test and hit a concrete blast wall to one flying at full throttle into a building.
But it's what keeps you guys amusing. The straws you grasp at.
if a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) were to really strike a wtc wall comprised of massive steel columns with a force equivalent to X then the massive steel wtc wall would also be striking the aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) with the same force equivalent to X.
of course this scientific certainty is much easier to ignore than it is to discuss, right, 11:07?
@ Anon 10:37 PM:
Gee, thanks Mom. :-)
Dear @11:35,
No problem son...
I was merely trying to distract everyone from considering the actual physics of a real aluminum 767 vs. a steel WTC by insinuating that you did not even know how to spell the word disintegrate properly!
My bad!
Love, Mom.
if a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) were to really strike a wtc wall comprised of massive steel columns with a force equivalent to X then the massive steel wtc wall would also be striking the aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) with the same force equivalent to X.
I agree. Ever think this may be why so little of the plane was recovered?
Now answer my question. Are you guys honestly saying a plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall is comparable to one flying at 500+mph into a building?
Honestly?
Are you guys honestly saying a plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall is comparable to one flying at 500+mph into a building?
Who ever said that? Talk about grasping straws-- you're the one making a straw man!
The 8:03 SHILL is a real comedian. She just isn't very funny.
"if a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) were to really strike a wtc wall comprised of massive steel columns with a force equivalent to X then the massive steel wtc wall would also be striking the aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) with the same force equivalent to X."
Two words: KINETIC ENERGY
Two More Words: POTENTIAL ENERGY
Really Spooky....you should work on getting some of your minions here graduated out of grammar school.
"Are you guys honestly saying a plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall is comparable to one flying at 500+mph into a building?
Who ever said that? Talk about grasping straws-- you're the one making a straw man!"
Why the hell post these pictures than if you aren't trying to say an aircraft is a fragile little flower? Read the comments from your minions, Spooky. GET A GRASP of things here. Its getting out of control.
if a real aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) were to really strike a wtc wall comprised of massive steel columns with a force equivalent to X then the massive steel wtc wall would also be striking the aluminum 767 (with a plastic nosecone) with the same force equivalent to X.
I agree. Ever think this may be why so little of the plane was recovered?
actually i think that thanks to this reality of physics we can consider all 4 of the officially produced videos that show alleged ua175 gliding entirely thru the wall of the wtc before any explosion occurs to be nothing more than badly done video fakery.
Now answer my question. Are you guys honestly saying a plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall is comparable to one flying at 500+mph into a building?
i'm not saying that. what i am saying is that the images of alleged ua175 that we were shown by the media were nothing more than video fakery.
video fakery
Two words: KINETIC ENERGY
Two More Words: POTENTIAL ENERGY
why don't you explain yourself there 10:12?
idiot.
How about three words, since we're having so much fun with words:
"Newton's 3rd Law"
Just for the sake of complete honesty here, I guess some of the commenters here were making comparisons between this plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall and to a plane "flying at 500+mph into a building".
So I take back the straw man comment.
Personally, I wasn't making a direct comparison "between this plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall and to a plane "flying at 500+mph into a building". I was more showing an example of how fragile a large plane can be when hitting concrete.
Importantly though, high speed is NOT going to make the plane less fragile.
spooked 11:17 "Importantly though, high speed is NOT going to make the plane less fragile."
My point exactly in sending you the link in the first place.
Another favorite of mine is: Having a plane stationary, swinging the WTC like a baseball bat, connecting with the bat at 500 mph into the plane, and IMAGINING the plane just slipping into the building.
Just for the sake of complete honesty here, I guess some of the commenters here were making comparisons between this plane that jumped its chocks and drove into a concrete wall and to a plane "flying at 500+mph into a building".
Just for clarity, the title of this post specifically refers to "no-planers", people who believe no planes hit the towers. (Or the Pentagon, or in Shanksville for that matter.) You then go on to post images of a plane that jumped its chocks and hit a wall in an attempt.
As long as we're clear that what happened on 9/11 and what happened to this plane are nowhere near similar, all's fine.
"(with a plastic nosecone)"
What does that "plastic" nosecone cover, asshole?
the plastic nosecone covers electronic components, asshole.
Where is the cutout of the plane's nose in the concrete?
POTENTIAL ENERGY, dudes!
Post a Comment
<< Home