Where'd the Fuselage Go?
Let's look at this photo again of the Shanksville crater:
Here's the best possible match of a Boeing 757 with the Shanksvile crater, given the official trajectory of inverted impact, with the plane traveling in the basic direction of the top of the photo:
Notice a wee problem?
Even if we assume the whole plane both blew up into tiny pieces or burrowed into the ground (as the official story holds), the fuselage would have had to have make some sort of crater in the ground where it hit. But there is nothing there where the fuselage should have hit.
This crater is bogus.
This is a nice companion diagram to my earlier proof regarding the Shanksville crater.
Here's the best possible match of a Boeing 757 with the Shanksvile crater, given the official trajectory of inverted impact, with the plane traveling in the basic direction of the top of the photo:
Notice a wee problem?
Even if we assume the whole plane both blew up into tiny pieces or burrowed into the ground (as the official story holds), the fuselage would have had to have make some sort of crater in the ground where it hit. But there is nothing there where the fuselage should have hit.
This crater is bogus.
This is a nice companion diagram to my earlier proof regarding the Shanksville crater.
posted by spooked at 2:31 PM
5 Comments:
93 exposes the whole shebang IMO. The one part of the scheme that day that went horribly wrong for the perps, where they scrambled to fix the problem with laughable results.
Good point Nolo.
IMO 77 exposes the whole shebang also.
They tried to piggyback a phony attack on the pentagon after the WTC explosions and they would have been better served just leaving well enough alone.
Where'd the Fuselage Go?
There was no fuselage.
I like your hand-drawn technical diagrams better.
Why do SHILLS lie about 9/11?
Post a Comment
<< Home