Humint Events Online: Not Just Edna in the Hole

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Not Just Edna in the Hole

17 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i see several other people waving from the same hole as edna.
notice the flames - they are very red in color - a red flame is just
about the lowest temperature of fire.

notice the severed columns - most appear to be severed at the welds but
many are severed at non-welds. it is my understanding that when a
structural weld is made, that weld must actually be stronger than the
steel that is being welded. notice also that several columns were not
severed but appear to be pinched or squeezed - this phenomena would
occur if insufficient shape-charges were placed on the sides of a
column. certainly the aluminum wings of a real 767 would not cause this
damage - and certainly there is NO debris from an aluminum 767 anywhere
in this hole.
fire cannot melt steel if it cannot even burn flesh.

12:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Fire cannot melt steel"

Oh my lord...I thought that one had been put to bed, but no sirree! Not here at the Spookmeisters Think Tank!

HERE we have those who *still* think the steel had to be "melted" for the building to fall!

Um.....ya!

6:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Um.....*right*!
Like the 9/11 commission whose report says that the fires weakened the steel.
Or like the history channel program "Why The Towers Fell" that says the incredible heat of the fire melted the steel.
An explosion is not a collapse.
Oh my lord...
Idiot.

9:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey everybody, 6:32 is going to explain how the towers were destroyed!

um.....ya.

10:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Which countries, businesses, and politicians benefited the most from falsely claiming that a small group of Arab men were the 9/11 perps?

Other than Russia (Chechnya), which major countries in recent years have used false-flag operations the most?

What's the story on the so-called "dancing Israelis" who were seen in N.J. observing the implosion of the WTC?

10:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She shoulda jumped. We coulda watched her bounce. Like a cartoon character. Wile E. Coyote, but in real life.

5:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

here she is falling 2nd photo.

why would she jump since there was no fire where she was?
she would have had every expectation of being rescued.

10:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You guys sure are smart.

Being able to tell the exact temperature of a fire from a photograph.

AMAZING!

My advice? Get the fuck off the internet and use your powers for good.

12:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bounce......

6:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

who can tell the exact temperature from a photograph?
although it very strange that 9/11 commission, NIST, NOVA, History Channel, Bazant etc. all say that "the incredible heat from the burning jet-fuel damaged the steel causing the towers to collapse" yet everyone can see with their own eyes that lots of people were standing right there where *raging infernos* were said to have been.

10:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Surely, some of those many people shown in the photos (from the link provided) would have made cell phone calls to relatives and others to report that a huge airliner had crashed into the WTC.

If there is no evidence that any such calls were made, what does that say about the SHILLS here who defend the
Official 9/11 story? Are they merely ignorant, or venal scumbags?

10:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

they can't be merely ignorant, because it has been repeatedly pointed out that there is no real evidence of a giant aluminum 767 having made that hole in wtc1.

but don't let the total lack of real evidence stop you shilltards!

2:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We won't let it stop us, don't worry.

The bigger question is what has stopped you people from taking this "total lack of real evidence" and actually doing something with it?

6.5 years and still nothing except a couple blogs.

Tick tock my friends. FEMA death camps are just around the bend!!

6:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A 100 ton giant aluminum and titanium and steel 767 traveling at 750 feet per second.

6:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

150 tons. And a real 767 is a giant hollow aluminum tube. And if the aluminum tube is hitting the steel of the wtc at 750 feet per second then the steel of the wtc is also hitting the giant aluminum tube at 750 feet per second.

Edna Cintron's white pants didn't even get dirty from the imaginary soot of the burning imaginary plane while she was standing in the hole that is too small for a 767 anyway.

http://nineeleven2001.t35.com/images/newyork-1.html

1:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A 100 ton giant aluminum and titanium and steel 767 traveling at 750 feet per second.

sure thing there shilly willy!

3:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd really pay good money to see you guys argue your case in court.

Shill this. Shill that.

Non-stop.

Classic stuff.

5:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger