CBS LITERALLY FAKED THE MOON LANDING
This is too funny:
Maybe for 9/11, they just took out the little caption saying "animation".
AP adds:
Maybe for 9/11, they just took out the little caption saying "animation".
AP adds:
This CBS broadcast again shows the magnitude of the audio fakery. Due to the speed of light limitation on the 2-way communications with the Earth, some 3 seconds are missing between an AstroNOT speaking and his hearing the beginning of the Houston chap's reply. We can hear bogus, instantaneous, "live" communications instead. Indicating it was all created in a stage here on Earth. An interesting aside, is that even if the two people--Cronkite and Schirra--did not know that the whole Apollo Program was a hoax till then, they would likely have known about the lack of a delay to the speed of light limitation that they were not hearing. Thus these two are pretty good actors! This is well known about Cronkite. His notorious 1988 PBS NOVA TV show on the Kennedy Assassination is an example. Several of the interviewed doctors later stated that the show's depicting them saying JFK's body showed only evidence of shots fired from the rear were manipulated, and part of what they said was excised. The show pretended that out of 19 medical examiners, only Cyril Wecht said the fatal head shot was obviously fired from the front. As Cronkite did the interviews, he must have known of the lies and distortions NOVA released to the public. He was the most DIShonest man in America.
Then I have commented on the flimsy joke of a landing craft. It's balance was so poor, that if an AstroNOT moved or coughed the whole thing would have irretreviably been thrown off kilter. One proof of this is Armstrong's ejecting from NASA's similar, simulating craft, the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV), just seconds after trying to fly it. http://www.astronautix.com/details/apo17954.htm To this day, NASA has been unable to successfully create a stable form of such craft. But, if in 1969, NASA's AstroNOTs could not fly such a simlar craft for more than a few seconds without crashing it, how could they have successfully created a similar craft that flew far longer (in time and space) and with two people on board to cause instabilities?
5 Comments:
that really is too funny!
What reason is there to think there's
anything sinister about the caption?
It just looks to me like CBS was
signaling to viewers that certain
images were indeed animation. That
would explain (to viewers) how
it was possible to show images
that couldn't have been captured
by a camera which hadn't as yet
arrived on the Moon's surface.
Uncle Walter and cousin Wally BOTH
had looks on their face and words
from their mouths which could be
interpreted to be nothing more than
poor acting. I'm referring to the
last few moments prior to "landing"
and the first moments thereafter.
The above comments should not be
construed to mean that I believe
there was an actual Moon landing.
The whole Apollo program was public relations. Bogus missions, bogus science, total fakery. My father actually worked on the LEM at Grumman and from what I understand many people were left scratching their heads.
Motorola has an add for a cell phone commemorating the event; will cash in, if possible, fake or not.
Named the AURA Celestial Edition.
Has engraved “Motorola AURA Celestial Edition, Honouring the Apollo 11 Mission, 20th July 1969"
Has audio, video from the event stored on it; such as „The eagle has landed“, “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind“, which is too much. Not clear how this helps anyone that is on the verge of starving.
This has something to do with Motorola equipment used for the mission, they say. This equates to big profits.
Motorola fones are junk. This one is
2,200 euro.
No mention of "America" since it is being pitched in Germany.
But this goes forward in the real world, that 99.9 percent. They don't really care fake or not.
I wonder what A.P. thinks about Jack White's JFK assassination photo research, e.g., his video The Great Zapruder Film Hoax? White has also extensively analyzed Apollo photos.
http://www.jfkstudies.org
Post a Comment
<< Home