Simon Shack Has an Agenda
From an email:
I seem to have gotten "suspended" from the new Reality Shack/September Clues website. No real loss because the problems with the research there have become more evident -- and the fact that I was pointing that out needless to say didn't sit well.
I began to look also into the victims in my area -- 5 actually grew up in my town. Another 7, either living here or in nearby towns. Also, a good number of them worked for Canter Fitzgerald. At any rate, I had found four who went to the Westfield High School and it just happened that my library had put the yearbooks online - as well as our town paper. The yearbooks go back to '29 and the Westfield Leader to '02! It's the kind of small town paper where you can find info on people from kindergarden to Junior High honor role and high school graduations. And, being in town, I was able to physically inspect most of the yearbooks. Only a handful of them aren't in the library.
At any rate, I didn't want to post the info at September Clues because it would make clear exactly where I live. So I passed the info on to Simon. At least on three of them. As I went to send info in on the last one, I realized I was "suspended."
But this is all 100% verifiable info that these people were REAL.
I was hoping that they weren't, actually.
posted by spooked at 3:39 PM
7 Comments:
simon shack?
never heard of him.
I began to look also into the victims in my area...But this is all 100% verifiable info that these people were REAL.
what victims exactly are you referring to?
Simon Shack is pushing the ugly false theory that nobody died at the World Trade Center. He's the author of September Clues, which was highly regarded for a while. But much was false. "Moving Bridges", moving buildings etc, are not evidence of "layering" but turn out to be Parallax, a little understood but still useful natural law.
YouGeneDebs on Youtube made Parallax 4U which explains what's going on.
Anyway, Simon wouldn't correct his work.
Then 911movement.org vanished, along with 2 years research of a lot of dedicated people.
Then "Reality Shack" appeared with some of the most hideous nonsense I've seen.
It is so embarrassing that they are claiming the WTC victims are "fake." More than a thousand left no DNA. That does not mean they never lived. That does not make them fictional. They claim Edna Cintron, the woman who spent her last hour waving from the plane shape hole, is a "sim". They are beyond the reach of facts.
Thanks for posting. This email is a useful warning, though obviously the writer's need for anonymity makes it impossible for him to prove his case.
I am personally suspicious of Reality Shack simply because of my inability to post. This may be a misunderstanding on my part.
I would love to see a concise analysis of the claims in the 'Vicsims report'. I find much of the material, both in the report and on the forum, superficially unconvincing. In particular, the endless comparison of slightly similar looking individuals appears pointless. I would love for Simon Shack to say 'Here are my three best bits of evidence - knock them down if you can'. If we can, then we can forget the whole thing. If we can't, then we have three new bits of evidence we can use. I don't suppose Simon Shack will do that though. As it is, trying to make sense of the long and meandering claims seems like a waste of energy. Even if the claims are debunked for a few victims, as this emailer claims to have managed, there will still be another two thousand to go! It is a tar-pit.
Anyway, whether Reality Shack is disinfo or not, the whole 911movement situation has taught me to stay away from forums.
@TWF,
"Moving Bridges", moving buildings etc, are not evidence of "layering" but turn out to be Parallax, a little understood but still useful natural law.
sorry WF, but when the camera stops moving but the bridge continues to move, that effectively rules out the "parralax" effect and leaves
video layering as the likely answer.
http://tinyurl.com/26f8f4
It is showing that the footage was caught by WESCAM, a camerasystem capable of amazing 15 mile zooms. WESCAM is documented. While some of it's lens system stopped moving, not all of it did. The incredible zoom gives the appearance of movement.
While some of it's lens system stopped moving, not all of it did
the towers stopped moving entirely - neither left/right nor even zooming in/out, while the bridge is moving at an alarming rate.
parralax cannot account for this - either the bridge is fleeing away in terror or video layering was employed.
OK Reality Shack has major issues with me and attacked me.
I was there on that day.
I never said anything to contradict anyone on the forum and they deleted my posts when I shared my story from that day.
The vicsim thing is complete BS as one of the fireman that died that day grew up with me. And is on the CNN memorial...I am not defending CNN..I am just stating that I saw someome I knew that died that day and he was a fireman.
Reality Shack is classic Counter Interpro..which sucks because I was suckered in! Planes or No Planes...I do see a pattern though mix some truth in and then censor you. I still think there was Video Fakery and actors...what is so crazy is that the same people that are exposing some of the tricks might also be the ones that are involved with it. It was my first encounter with a paid spook, so these people are really on the defensive now..they will soon be brought to justice!
You can't kill the truth no matter how much you try it always comes back to haunt you.
Who knows maybe the vicsim thing isn't really Simon Shack's idea and just a way to discredit his work!
Confused!
Post a Comment
<< Home