Kwality Kraftmanship from NASA
Check out the side panels on the LEM:
(click to enlarge)
I don't really get why parts of the LEM are covered in foil/mylar, and parts in tar paper... and why wouldn't the upper section be covered? Doesn't it need protection? Why do the legs require shielding anyway? Does that make any sense?
(click to enlarge)
I don't really get why parts of the LEM are covered in foil/mylar, and parts in tar paper... and why wouldn't the upper section be covered? Doesn't it need protection? Why do the legs require shielding anyway? Does that make any sense?
posted by spooked at 8:05 AM
17 Comments:
I like how the lower part is so pristine you could eat your lunch off it, after the fiery and violent touchdown.
i like the gold foil reynolds wrap and duct tape - i guess that protects the astronots from cosmic radiation.
there is a number at the bottom of the first pic spooked...look for it. ;-)
Yes, there is a "33" near the very center, upon enlargement of the top photo. Good catch.
But, as I have written, nothing demonstrates the Apollo fakery better than the video of the top half of the LM "lifting off" without a single atom of exhaust coming from its large central rocket engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOdzhQS_MMw
And here now may be a world first additional aspect of the fakery in that video:
Note how the camera alleged to be on the rover is able to adjust in real time for panning and/or zooming out. (And always has the LM in its sight.) The problem is that NASA claims it was controlled from Earth. But the 2-way communications with Earth is limited by the speed of light, and thus there is an approx. 3 second delay that would have precluded the camera from adjusting in real time, and seeing the "liftoff" perfectly, if this were all real. NASA has never let Physics get in the way of its fakery.
But the lack of any exhaust--even though the explosive bolts of separation appear to be real--is the most telling of the fakery, especially against the very black sky of an atmosphere-less body. (It it were real.)
A "little" Quarantine has "something" to do with all this... as noted below.
Anonymous Physicist
http://www.anonymousphysicist.com
I see it now-- thanks, Robert. That pic is such a great bogus pic-- and it has the 33. Awesome!
btw, I invite everyone to sign up for DU and debate the clowns
here.
Could really use some help!
It's worth noting that the Apollo 16 LM was named "Orion", which has significance to the PTB and ultimate truths-- and may be partly why that 33 is plastered on several Apollo 16 pics.
Yeah, so there is 33 on at least a dozen pics from that Apollo 16 series. What is truly weird is that it is clearly not part of a series, as the other pics have no number at all in the similar position. This is probably as good proof as any that 33 has special significance.
Which other pics have a 33, and what is/are the difference(s) between those and the ones that don't have a 33?
A.P.
@A.P. 6:50
Actually, the '33' I see is at the very bottom of the top photo.
Where exactly is the one you see that's in the middle?
I guess what I wrote was not quite clear:
"Yes, there is a "33" near the very center, upon enlargement of the top photo."
I meant to say the very bottom-center, of that photo.
A.P.
@S: btw, I invite everyone to sign up for DU and debate the clowns
really dude why do you waste your time trying to prove stuff to obvious shills and the willfully ignorant?
the fact that one has to sign up @ DU speaks for itself.
all of those clowns have a link to this blog and the fact that not one of them ever dares to come here and debate also speaks for itself.
no thanx, jh.
Where are you when we need you Ron Howard?
I always felt bad for that scientist in "a beautiful mind"....I doubt if he was crazy...just set up by the cia psych crazies. I cannot believe Ron Howard does not even allow for this possibility. He has to be the master of intel propaganda craziness.
"Ron Howard ... has to be the master of intel propaganda craziness."
For sure! Of course there are many in Hollywood who do similar work. But I can't wait for Howard to do a 9/11 movie!
I was thinking the same thing: Ron Howard does "Let's Roll"--the day america got mad and went to war!
Whoever thought Opie would grow up and become a Nazi propaganda film director?
Speaking of movies, theater, actors, producers.....
Have been reading a lot on E.Howard Hunt. His skill as a CIA black bag man was creating elaborate theatrical scenarios, with lots of staged actors, to put out a cover story, create misdirection and general confusion during coups, assassinations, etc. One element that has not been closely documented is just how many company actors were involved in the 911 production. All the calls to the networks from shills putting out the cover story, the on the street "candid" interviews.
That is all.
Post a Comment
<< Home