Explosive Flash Observed as South Tower Goes Down-- Three Different Camera Angles
Two camera angles shown here.
New camera angle here:
Whereas most of the explosives must have been in the interior of the tower, this one may have been critical to buckle the corner of the upper tower as it went down-- presumably to minimize the distance the upper chunk fell.
Whatever the case, there is clearly a small bright explosive flash associated with the tower going down.
UPDATE: Interesting that the explosion seems to be around the 90th floor-- conceivably the 92nd floor, where renovations were going on along with floor hit renovations prior to 9/11.
New camera angle here:
Whereas most of the explosives must have been in the interior of the tower, this one may have been critical to buckle the corner of the upper tower as it went down-- presumably to minimize the distance the upper chunk fell.
Whatever the case, there is clearly a small bright explosive flash associated with the tower going down.
UPDATE: Interesting that the explosion seems to be around the 90th floor-- conceivably the 92nd floor, where renovations were going on along with floor hit renovations prior to 9/11.
posted by spooked at 9:21 AM
7 Comments:
Good videos.
This fits perfectly with what I have written from the outset. The innards were vaporized with small nukes. The use of nukes had to be hidden from the masses, so they could not be seen to blow through the extant structure. Accomplished by the use of conventional explosives to deal with the outer structure.
The inner structure? As already noted--much of it not there anymore. Vaporized, up in smoke.
Perhaps the perps preferred not to destroy buildings outside the WTC as much as possible. But the main reason for the outer conv. explosives was to not have any blow-through showing the nukes, if possible.
Some though may have shown itself at the end, and is why we are not allowed to see the last seconds of "collapse" on virtually all videos taken. Except the one showing the [nuclear] glow.
Outer use of conv. explosives is also great for the coming disinfo from the nuclear physicist. Some conv. explosive was used allowing him to cloud and avoid the issue of the vaporization (unattainable by "thermite) of all the innards including structural steel VAPORIZATION from "extraordinarily high temperatures."
Anonymous Physicist
To this day is still boggles my mind how the perps were able to not only rig the WTC 1 & 2 with Nukes, but also as we see in this video rig conventional explosives all the way up the entire height of the building(s) while people were coming into these buildings to work and conduct business on a daily basis.
How they were able to successfully pull that off, which would've been no small feat without detection still twists my brain into a pretzel.
@A.P.:
I would very much like to hear your opinion on how you feel this feat was accomplished by the 9/11 perps.
Oh, I forgot to add that I'm well aware of the Scott Forbes WTC "power down" story/BS.
Also Spooked, the video links on your WTC demolition site are dead. :-(
Rob--
there were apparently extensive renovations going on throughout the WTC in the years before 9/11, particularly in the plane impact floors. This is apart from the Forbes story.
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/01/huge-wtc-smoking-gun-renovation-of.html
So some of the conventional explosives were undoubtedly placed then. And I don't think mini-nukes required any special effort to place, since there were relatively few and they would blow through most things in their way.
Also, the Terrorize.dk site has been dead for a few years, unfortunately, as it was a great resource for 9/11 videos. But we have Youtube now.
Good video. The one I'd seen before wasn't obvious like the darkened, slo mo version here.
It is both not my place to try to detail exactly how explosives were planted, and really no big deal for a regime that controls everything and gives itself the right to do anything to anyone at any time--regardless of any laws.
It is also speculation which anyone can do.
But emplacing the nukes was not difficult because they likely were the old, dependable pure fission (micro- or mini-)nukes which were quite small and there were not that many of them, as hypothesized by me.
Conv. explosives we can all speculate about. Timewise, this can run from emplacement during construction--a Rockefeller-owned matter, so a high level British control right there--to anytime thereafter.
I have detailed that those ultimately in charge know what they will do hundreds or even thousands of years into the future. 30 or so years is no big deal. It was known to the PTB how and when it would be destroyed.
Forbes says he is a Brit, about whom I can not find any Bio. And video of him shows him to speak about as truthfully as Prainmath.
Also those whom he did interviews with were the pseudo-liberal or fake 911truthers that were easy to detect themselves.
So his likely lying indicates the conv. explosives were probably placed at other time(s).
See more at www.anonymousphysicist.com
Anonymous Physicist
Post a Comment
<< Home