All 2nd Hit Video Plane Paths Reconciled?

Regardless of what you might think about "Achimspok", pretty impressive work here:


I *have* in fact in the past pushed the idea that there are conflicting plane paths in the 2nd hit videos. I did some early work modeling the 2nd hit with flight simulator, and it was exceedingly difficult, tedious, time-consuming work. I thought there was some evidence for conflicting paths, such as the video shown here at 3:12. But viewing angles can be extremely misleading and I guess I was wrong about the flight path shown in that video. I guess if you are low enough and close enough to the towers, it can look like the plane ascends in the last few seconds.

This video does a great job of reconciling the different angles, but it's really hard to rule out more subtle differences between paths. Basically, Achimspok is showing a best fit flight path that roughly agrees with the videos he shows.

Even if we assume the flight paths were the same in all videos, this doesn't mean there wasn't video fakery, of course. This just means the fakers were very coordinated and had a centralized process for the flight path modeling.

As far as Achimspok, I don't really know who has the TIME to put together something like this, except without either a life, or an honest job. I always wonder about the people like Achimspok and Genghis, who put together these extensive, really high-tech video presentations-- for what reward? Note, at the end, there are a couple of 33's thrown in, so you have to wonder.

Just to note here, he calculates 527 mph initial speed, going to 624 mph than 581 mph at the end. So obviously very fast; way too fast for an amateur pilot, and maybe too fast for anyone to handle the plane in the manner shown in the videos.

There is an incredible dive in there, which would have thrown everyone around who wasn't buckled in, and certainly it's hard to reconcile that with the official story-- the actual cockpit conditions.