No More Nuclear Power Plants
Or AT LEAST build safer nuke plants.
But it should be obvious by now that we can move away from this dangerous, extremely toxic technology-- there are so many safer alternatives, if we can just invest in the infrastructure necessary. While the PTB and their toady politicians are clearly intent on poisoning humanity, we don't need to put up with this.
Japanese nuclear plant hit by fire and third explosion
Japan Faces Potential Nuclear Disaster as Radiation Levels Rise
But it should be obvious by now that we can move away from this dangerous, extremely toxic technology-- there are so many safer alternatives, if we can just invest in the infrastructure necessary. While the PTB and their toady politicians are clearly intent on poisoning humanity, we don't need to put up with this.
Japanese nuclear plant hit by fire and third explosion
Japan Faces Potential Nuclear Disaster as Radiation Levels Rise
posted by spooked at 10:36 AM
2 Comments:
So Mr./Ms "No More Nuclear Plants" -- where have been currently (and in the past) proffering the confirmed and documented use of LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions)[free energy] that has no radiation issues? Condemning the existing Nuclear technology has a very hollow ring to it, when the other technology exists, but in your "alternatives", but you have chosen to not offer the specific really existing solution. Just wondering?
We could easily exploit solar, wind and geothermal energy much more than we do, which is what I was referring to. But deeper, there probably is cold fusion that has been suppressed, and possibly there is truly free energy technology available that is being suppressed. I'm not at all familiar with LENR, and your comment overall is a bit confusing.
Post a Comment
<< Home