Humint Events Online: No Evidence for Extraterrestrials?

Friday, October 28, 2011

No Evidence for Extraterrestrials?

I've been struck lately by academic scientists-- e.g. Harvard Psychologist Susan Clancy and Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins-- who simply can't believe or won't acknowledge that evidence of extra-terrestrials visiting the earth exists. It's really a stunning ignorance of even looking at or simply acknowledging the extensive evidence for an alien presence on our history. Now, either these people are intel agents, and are purposefully putting out disinfo to fool the educated masses, or they just have some mental block about getting into anything that smacks of "conspiracy". I don't know. I suspect the latter for Dawkins. On the other hand, Clancy specifically delved into the question of ETs in her study of alien abduction stories, and refused to admit any claim of any UFO or abduction was real. Clancy may well be intel. But overall, it's ridiculous and ignorant, to have "scientists" refuse to look at evidence because it is controversial.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that the religious scholars who sought to try and understand their God's creation through explorations of the physical world created the scientific method as a means to counter the concept of faith.

Belief in the scientific method and belief in God are essentially the same because beliefs tend to be personal opinions held to the exclusion of all other possibilities.

If you are trying to convince an audience that your belief is superior to someone else's, it is easier to ignore or ridicule information that does not fit your stated position than it is to adapt your ego belief to accomodate that information.

Hence; mainstream religions, Clancy and Dawkins all choose to ignore the possibility of inner world and off world interventions because to do otherwise would threaten their ability to control the reality their egos want the world to see.

The narrow perspectives of Dawkins and Clancy are, in effect, a contemporary scientific reflection of the narrow mindedness of the Spanish Inquisition.

6:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The above comment is spot on. Amen, brother!

But the cat's paw "skepticism" game that Clancy and Dawkins inherited from the Phillip Klass generation that "doubted" their way before them is, consciously or blindly, just stoking the fires (in the sheeple's collective, hive mind) of RECEPTIVENESS to the long-planned "Blue-Beam Party" of a staged/fake alien invasion, when the "war on terror" has finally run its course and a new global enemy is needed as a bogus target for the international war-profiteers/bankers/elitists/occultists/NWO control freaks/etc.

2:27 AM  
Anonymous stephanie said...

Very good information and facts, many thanks to the creator. It is perplexing to me now, but in general, the usefulness and relevance is overpowering. Very much thanks once again and also all the best. You're truly well informed and very intelligent. You write something that people could understand and make the subject intriguing for everyone. I will save this for future use.

1:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger