Freak Scene 2
*UPDATED BELOW*
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315518/Plane-fragment-9-11-wedged-Manhattan-buildings.html
Note, Wolf Blitzer here, referring to a plane "destroyed" during the 9/11 attack, rather than a plane that crashed into the WTC. Sort of like, it was destroyed as part of the attacks?
Very coincidentally, just yesterday, I was looking at some plane parts from 9/11, and starting to have some doubts about the "no-plane" theory.
But THIS-- totally fishy. Looks totally like a set-up, meant to remind people about 9/11. Right after the Boston bombing and the Bush library. The tie-in with the Mosque plays on the Muslim fears. This is pure psyop art, it seem to me. The rope is a dead giveaway though.
There's no freaking way this plane piece got into this TIGHT space after any plane crash.
It was TOTALLY PLANTED. THAT MUST BE CLEAR TO EVERYONE.
What a freaking weird world we live in.... UPDATE A very relevant, interesting article here about the landing gear piece that apparently crashed into the Burlington coat factory building next to where this new part was found. I must say, it's getting to be harder to be a "no-planer" as more and more evidence of plane parts comes out. (tug collar, wipe brow) I mean, clearly there is extensive weirdness to the official plane story... but there is also significant evidence of planes. I do think no one should be wedded to one scenario when we are working with limited evidence-- which is so often the case for conspiracy issues.
Found: part of a landing gear from one of the 9/11 planes was discovered
wedged between buildings with a mysterious rope around it.
Police have found a sizable piece of one of the engines from a plane that crashed into the World Trade Center, more than 11 years after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
The piece of landing gear was found wedged between two buildings just blocks from Ground Zero- in between the buildings at 51 Park Place and 50 Murray Street in downtown Manhattan.
This is very very weird...
The location is particularly noteworthy because 51 Park Place is the site of the Islamic Cultural Center that stirred up controversy and months of protests two years ago when the site developers wanted to turn it into a mosque.
Note, Wolf Blitzer here, referring to a plane "destroyed" during the 9/11 attack, rather than a plane that crashed into the WTC. Sort of like, it was destroyed as part of the attacks?
Very coincidentally, just yesterday, I was looking at some plane parts from 9/11, and starting to have some doubts about the "no-plane" theory.
But THIS-- totally fishy. Looks totally like a set-up, meant to remind people about 9/11. Right after the Boston bombing and the Bush library. The tie-in with the Mosque plays on the Muslim fears. This is pure psyop art, it seem to me. The rope is a dead giveaway though.
There's no freaking way this plane piece got into this TIGHT space after any plane crash.
It was TOTALLY PLANTED. THAT MUST BE CLEAR TO EVERYONE.
What a freaking weird world we live in.... UPDATE A very relevant, interesting article here about the landing gear piece that apparently crashed into the Burlington coat factory building next to where this new part was found. I must say, it's getting to be harder to be a "no-planer" as more and more evidence of plane parts comes out. (tug collar, wipe brow) I mean, clearly there is extensive weirdness to the official plane story... but there is also significant evidence of planes. I do think no one should be wedded to one scenario when we are working with limited evidence-- which is so often the case for conspiracy issues.
posted by spooked at 6:24 PM
4 Comments:
9/11 Plane Landing Gear May Have Been Planted Between Buildings
http://gothamist.com/2013/04/27/911_plane_lan
ding_gear_may_have_bee.php#photo-1
a "mysterious rope" was attached to the landing gear, lol. did they need that to put the landing gear into that tight space and then it accidentally got dropped?
weird timing and a weird place. as far as the NPT is concerned: I am still convinced that no Boeing 767 hit the world trade center, since it is nearly impossible to hit a target like the WTC at such an incredible speed - high speed makes it hard to direct a plane at a target. Then it could be that the aircraft was remote controlled but a Boeing 767 would still have been at a danger to break apart at such a high speed. Another possibility would be a UAV drone of some sort that could perform well under these conditions which would explain the discrepancy of the eyewitness accounts of the 2nd hit.
All the plane debris could have been planted. One way to do this would be to place some 767 debris next to the exlosives that were possibly planted in the part of the south tower were the plane was about to hit, they would be all over the place then.
let's not forget about the suspicious phone calls of plane witnesses aired on 9/11 (tony arrigo, gary welz etc.). After the first hit everybody was looking at the north tower where the object/aircraft hit its northern facade. We all know that, but there is so much we can only speculate about.
but a Boeing 767 is nearly impossible and since they prepared the collapse of the towers so thoroughly they couldn't leave anything up to chance on that day. That pretty much rules out the 767.
I love the black box controversy. Official version: no black box was found, but there are witness accounts by fire fighters that they three of four of them were recovered and that the FBI took them which they deny. http://www.counterpunch.org/2005/12/19/9-11-missing-black-boxes-in-world-trade-center-attacks-found-by-firefighters-analyzed-by-ntsb-concealed-by-fbi/ here the debunkers version of that:
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/The_Black_Boxes
It is always good to read both sides. I have to agree with the debunkers about this one. So there we have two witness accounts stating black boxes were found on ground zero which are unreliable and don't prove anything. But what these accounts do is that they bolster the claim that there were planes hitting the towers - these fictional plane parts are getting planted directly into the minds of the truthers - great.
"There is a Boeing identification number on the gear, but the National Transportation Safety Board hasn't checked it against the two 9/11 flights yet."
I'm not going to hold my breath! :)
Also, interesting but not surprising there were no marks on the buildings-- so it's not like this piece could have been projected from the WTC and then hit the top of one bldg and slid down in the crack. That was already highly unlikely, but this kind of nails it.
And now they are saying they can't even get it out with some sort of demolition, it's in there so tight? How convenient.
and the gap isn't aligned in a south to north direction but rather from east to west. impossible.
Post a Comment
<< Home