Humint Events Online: December 2015

Monday, December 28, 2015

The Importance of Conspiracy Theories

The thing about being a conspiracy researcher or student of conspiracies, it's so easy to let it become the most important thing in the world, and to convince yourself how important what you're doing is... and how if you could show everyone the truth about 9/11 or UFOs or the JFK assassination (to name a few), you could change the world for the better. And yeah, it's largely true, except for one really stupid thing...


This is always weird to realize, since most people give major fucks about a lot of really stupid trivial superficial stuff. And it's frustrating when they don't care about your important truth.

So it's important to put things in perspective, and to find common ground wherever possible.

That is all.

Bookmark and Share

Nuclear Safety Officer in WTC7 Lobby on 9/11

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Was 9/11 a Paranormal Event?

I know this sounds crazy... and as I type this I look out my window and see a full moon (honest to god).... but....

There's no doubt 9/11 was an event of high strangeness.

For over 10 years now, I have studied the oddities of 9/11, and there are just too many freaking oddities in the whole thing.

The "official story" is obviously crap.

But the planes, the planes, the planes ... It's like the planes were both there, and not there.

There was of course, the ghost plane, which has all the aspects of a paranormal event, in so many ways-- ghostly appearance, lack of any logical explanation, witnesses both saw it and didn't see it.

The crash scenes fit some sort of plane, but also don't make sense for a plane. They have a fake yet real aspect, that is hard to capture in words.

The "Flight 93"crash site:
It's spooky.

Obviously, the no-planes hypothesis holds that this was all faked.

But how was this even faked? It's really like there was a plane that was half in our reality, and half out of our reality.

I've actually thought for a long time there's just something super unreal-- surreal-- with every 9/11 site.

It does seem as if some paranormal entity tampered with every 9/11 disaster site, and "poofed" stuff away: plane parts, WTC debris, passengers, etc. "Poofed" as in moved into another dimension or teleported elsewhere.

If ETs are here, and the evil ET's are fucking with us, can we really put it past them that they would make something like 9/11 so freaking weird?

Then there are the amazing number of 9/11 synchronicities... and improbabilities and coincidences and premonitions. (Just a few here.) How was this possibly planned?

Remembered about 5 years ago I had this email exchange with Marcus Icke:

(me) Do you think there could have been some mystical type events on 9/11, like at the WTC; the plane hits and the "collapses" still defy logic and science. On the other hand, it's almost impossible to believe it was all planned fakery.
(Icke) 911 was a ritual sacrafice, it's temporal location based on the position of objects in the heavens (to optimise the effect of the trauma). They put their cabalsitic numbers all over the operation and laughed at us with the name, 911. They used 7/7 over here but it perhaps should have been 9/9/9. 999 is what you dial in the U.K. for police, fire or ambulence. The science used in 911 exceeds the knowledge base of "convential wisdom" - that is why we are all (still) scratchhing our heads. Hope that helps!?

I basically dropped this idea at the time, but lately have been wondering more about this sort of thing...

Bookmark and Share

"The Mothman Prophecies"

I saw the movie a few years ago and thought it was good, but mostly just another weird story made into a movie. They said it was based on true events, but it was hard to figure out what was going on, so I didn't really think about it much. It didn't fit into any other conspiracy paradigm, as portrayed in the movie. I did note at the time that there was an obvious 33 in it, at the climactic bridge scene.

I only realized "The Mothman Prophecies" was based on a book this past year, when I was reading "The Real Men in Black", about the strange men that often accompany paranormal and UFO events and act to cover up the truth. "The Mothman Prophecies" by John Keel was said to have extensive descriptions of Men in Black (MIB), so I got that book and read it. "The Real Men in Black" by Nick Redfern is somewhat cheesy and tabloidy in style, whereas Keel's "The Mothman Propechies" is well written and serious.

Overall, "The Mothman Prophecies" is one of the creepiest books I've ever read, and a lot of weird things happened when I was reading it.

First off, not surprisingly, the book is quite different from the movie, and deals extensively in UFOs and out of this world visitors and MIB. The movie never touches on these aspects. It really only deals with the mothman, and some creepy predictions by a character named Indrid Cold. The mothman appears to be a paranormal creature, possibly an alien or time traveler or inter-dimensional traveler, it's not really clear. Apparently many people have seen these creatures around the world throughout history. The movie never actually shows the Indrid Cold character, but just makes him as some sort of strange spiritual or even god-like creature. In the book, Indrid Cold is a humanoid visitor from space, from a distant planet/galaxy, also possibly a time traveler or inter-dimensional traveler, who lands in West Virginia on a space ship and makes contact with a man named Woodrow Derenberger (who wrote his own book about his experiences). Mr. Derenberger is even abducted an taken to the planet of Indrid Cold, apparently.

"The Mothman Prophecies" is full of UFO incidents that are "close encounters of the 3rd kind"-- where spacecrafts land and extra-terrestrials get out and interact with earth people.  These incidents all occur in the area of Point Pleasant, West Virginia. And it's supposed to be true. John Keel is a well known writer and was thought to be legitimate and serious UFO researcher (he passed away about 10 years ago).

Oddly to me, in the "The Mothman Prophecies", Keel is not a fan of the idea that UFOs and their occupants and the mothman and MIB are not really extra-terrestrials from other planets. He seems to favor some paranormal or extra-dimensional or time-travel explanation for them. He even tries to tie MIB and other such creatures as semi-rational explanations for religious experiences, postulating that MIB were manifestations of the devil, and that certain ETs and even forms of the mothman could be angels.

Whatever is the explanation, something very very strange happened around Point Pleasant in the period of 1966-1967, with an extensive wave of UFO sightings, MIB sightings, mothman sightings, paranormal phenomena, psychic predictions, synchronicities, all culminating in the collapse of the Silver bridge, which killed 46 people.

So there were three very weird things that happened to me while I was reading "The Mothman Propechies":

1) I was reading it at night, and kept falling asleep while reading it -- really deeply asleep-- and then I would lose my place. What would happen is I kept losing my place. I would fall asleep for a few minutes, then wake up, and put the book aside, but I never seemed to mark my place. So what kept happening is I read the middle of the book totally out of sequence, Certainly I tend to fall asleep reading in bed, but this thing with losing my place never happened to me so badly before. It was very disorienting. The other thing that kept happening when I read it at night is I would sleep poorly-- trouble falling asleep after waking up and that sort of thing. I finally decided to read the book during the day time and that's how I had to finish it.

2) Synchronicity 1-- the book mentioned a historical (urban legend?) crime figure named "Springheeled Jack", who terrorized London in the 1800's. I had never heard of this guy in my life before. Then about 2 hours after reading this, I was watching a British crime show where the perpetrator styled himself after "Springheeled Jack".

3) Synchronicity 2-- the book mentioned how John Keel was having weird problems with his phone calls and even his mail was getting intercepted and not delivered. The same day as I read this, I got a phone call from my power company saying they got the bill they had sent me, sent back to me as "undeliverable", even though it had my proper address. THIS IS SUPER BIZARRE.

So, there is something odd going on, and I must say throughout my life I have had various odd coincidences and synchronicities...  it really makes you wonder....

(post edited to fix a few grammatical mistakes and to clarify a few sentences on Dec. 29th, 2015)

UPDATE: 1/1/2016-- I finished Redfern's book "The Real Men in Black", and the ending was better than the beginning. There are some really interesting ideas in there about what the MIB really are. The time traveler explanation is particularly interesting... but also the "tulpa" concept is really neat as well.
Bookmark and Share

"Out of the Blue" -- UFO Movie

An excellent overview of the UFO phenomenon, with coverage of some fairly impeccable, famous cases, also several clips of bona fide saucer footage:
Bookmark and Share

Monday, December 21, 2015


Well, this disturbing article explains some things--
The KKK Has Infiltrated U.S. Police Departments for Decades. 
During the Civil Rights movement, one of the KKK’s first orders was to infiltrate police departments around the country.

White supremacists are a source of much great evil in this world and in our history.
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Agency Involved in UFO Video Confiscation -- Used to Cover Up No Planes on 9/11?

Very interesting podcast here with film-maker James Fox.

He talks about how there are some secret (presumably US govt) agents who are clearly involved in monitoring UFO videos, and intercepting them-- especially if they are discussed online, or via email.

But this makes perfect sense for how no planes on 9/11 could have been covered up.

IF anyone had videos showing no plane on 9/11 in 2001, how would they get them out? Undoubtedly it would be by the internet-- particularly at that time, we had little knowledge of how much scrutiny there was of the internet... how much spying was going on. Innocent people might discuss their no plane video online, and get censored or bought off or even threatened.

But this type of thing has been going on for a long time-- because of the UFO cover-up. And these guys simply had to use their powers for covering up the 9/11 scam.

A related story is about the weird weird "men in black" who are often involved in these cover-ups.

I will save that for another post.
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

GOP = Psychopathic Monsters

My mind can barely even process how incredibly obscene and demented this is.

"Ben Carson: I am OK with Killing "Thousands of Innocent Children and Civilians""
During Tuesday’s debate, radio host Hugh Hewitt asked Dr. Ben Carson if he was ruthless enough to wage war. "You are OK with the deaths of thousands of innocent children and civilians?" Hewitt asked. Carson, a neurosurgeon, responded, "You got it. You got it."
HUGH HEWITT: And—neurosurgeon. And people admire and respect and are inspired by your life story, your kindness, your evangelical core support. We’re talking about ruthless things tonight—carpet bombing, toughness, war. And people wonder, could you do that? Could you order airstrikes that would kill innocent children by not the scores, but the hundreds and the thousands? Could you wage war as a commander-in-chief? 
DR. BEN CARSON: Well, interestingly enough, you should see the eyes of some of those children when I say to them, "We’re going to have to open your head up and take out this tumor." They’re not happy about it, believe me. And they don’t like me very much at that point. But later on, they love me. Sometimes you—I sound like him. Later—you know, later on, you know, they really realize what’s going on. And by the same token, you have to be able to look at the big picture and understand that it’s actually merciful if you go ahead and finish the job, rather than death by a thousand pricks. 
HUGH HEWITT: So you are OK with the deaths of thousands of innocent children and civilian. It’s like— 
DR. BEN CARSON: You got it. You got it. 
HUGH HEWITT: That is what war—can you be as ruthless as Churchill was in prosecuting the war against the Nazis? 
DR. BEN CARSON: "Ruthless" is not necessarily the word I would use, but tough, resolute, understanding what the problems are and understanding that the job of the president of the United States is to protect the people of this country and to do what is necessary in order to get it done.

All the fucking demagogue war porn addicts on that stage were just as bad, just calling for  war, war, war, all they fucking care about is ISIS. Just beyond evil.


Bookmark and Share

Sunday, December 13, 2015

No Plane Hit the Ground in Shanksville

Bookmark and Share

No Plane Hit the Pentagon

A composite of several photos showing the overall damage to the Pentagon facade:

That hole in the second story is 17.5 feet wide, if we assume 12 foot floor heights.

I see several anomalies here that are inconsistent with a 757 hit. A couple of big anomalies are the lack of marks from the impact of the huge 757 tail section, and that windowless section on the right hand side that simply looks bombed out on the first and second floor. A third big anomaly is the square hole on the second floor with the center piece dangling down. More thoughts on this here.

Higher res of the facade damage (click to enlarge):

And then this for the plane perspective (click to enlarge):

Need I point out how much of the tail and wings don't fit into this hole and yet there was no evidence of pieces of these sections on the Pentagon lawn?

It's quite ludicrous.

Nonetheless, the fakers did a good job setting up the plane path illusion-- the downed light poles, the various pieces of plane debris, the line of damage inside the building, the damaged generator, the witnesses who claim they saw the plane hit the building or plane sections inside the building, and the passenger remains scattered inside in the Pentagon (with a bizarrely high number found in the "exit hole").

The damage to the generator is one of the big outstanding mysteries, since it shows something flying towards it and hitting it, as well as disproves the official story. My guess it's more clever fakery.

Overall, there seems to have been a fly-by/fly-over of a large plane over the Pentagon, that many witnesses saw, but importantly, that plane came from the wrong angle.

The damage to the Pentagon wall must have been from clever use of explosives, planted during renovations of the section, much like what happened at the WTC.

Bookmark and Share

No Planes Hit the WTC

Not bad:
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Rocket Fakery?

Not sure what to make of this--

The rocket landing video sure looks fake, and hard to believe.

Comments are good here, definitely a lot of fakery in the space rocket field. I always thought Elon Musk was hard to believe.
Bookmark and Share

Friday, December 11, 2015

The Frightening Face of a TrumpBot

Susan DeLemus:
We’ve got people in positions of power who I know for a fact are liars. LIARS. I watch the TV—my president comes on the TV and he LIES to me. I know he’s lying! He lies all the time. I don’t believe any one of them! Not one. I believe Donald. [background: Mm-hm. Exactly.] I’m telling you. He says what I’m thinking! Never been involved in politics, never had an interest in any of it. Now, suddenly, he is resonating. He is resonating with the people and he’s speaking our minds. Our minds! When the “pundits,” and the “experts,” and all the people who are supposed to be “in the know,” and know all this stuff, and they’re so great—I know, some of them, maybe not all, but some of them are lying to me. Straight to my face. And I am so sick of it.

And sure, Obama and most politicians lie, but how brainwashed do you have to be to think Trump is telling the truth?

Of course, she's a massive liar, since she's been quite involved in politics:
DeLemus isn’t just some rando Trump wingnut though, and this isn’t the first time she’s gone batshit on camera. DeLemus is a former New Hampshire State Representative (R — natch) who previously caught the limelight for threatening a state assistant attorney general during the last election for allowing Barack Obama’s name to appear on the ballot.

It must be watched to get the full effect of her craziness.
Bookmark and Share

Saturday, December 05, 2015

Oddities About the San Bernardino Massacre/Terror Incident

I plan to continually update this as I learn more...

1) main suspect was at workplace meeting/party, left, came back with wife and they shot up co-workers

2) female/wife involved in shooting

3) gunman wore masks-- who was it really?

4) 3 shooters reported initially, then just 2

5) couple had baby, had dropped off at grandmother before incident

6) couple apparently had stockpiled weapons/ammo arsenal and bombs, but their main attack was strangely disorganized/spur of moment/odd choice, no follow up plan

7) CNN said burner phones were disposed of at scene of shooting?

8) FBI turned apartment owned by couple to landlord within 2 days, and media goes through it on air-- odd if apartment was really scene of bomb-making, weapons stockpiles. Good piece on this from 21st Century Wire.

9) suspect's family hires lawyer who believes Sandy Hook was a fake conspiracy

10) black SUV used by couple is typical "bad guy" vehicle, not a family car

11) Seriously? Lovely picture of the main male suspect...

UPDATE: A related list of oddities from VT.
Bookmark and Share

Bush Administration War Criminals-- Cheney Gets Immortalized

Pretty sickening:
As vice president, Dick Cheney was a prime architect of the worldwide torture regime implemented by the U.S. government (which extended far beyond waterboarding), as well as the invasion and destruction of Iraq, which caused the deaths of at least 500,000 people and more likely over a million. As such, he is one of the planet’s most notorious war criminals.  
President Obama made the decision in early 2009 to block the Justice Department from criminally investigating and prosecuting Cheney and his fellow torturers, as well as to protect them from foreign investigations and even civil liability sought by torture victims. Obama did that notwithstanding a campaign decree that even top Bush officials are subject to the rule of law and, more importantly, notwithstanding a treaty signed in 1984 by Ronald Reagan requiring that all signatory states criminally prosecute their own torturers. 
Obama’s immunizing Bush-era torturers converted torture from a global taboo and decades-old crime into a reasonable, debatable policy question, which is why so many GOP candidates are now openly suggesting its use. But now, the Obama administration has moved from legally protecting Bush-era war criminals to honoring and gushing over them in public. 
Yesterday, the House of Representatives unveiled a marble bust of former Vice President Cheney, which — until a person of conscience vandalizes or destroys it — will reside in Emancipation Hall of the U.S. Capitol. At the unveiling ceremony, Cheney was, in the playful words of NPR, “lightly roasted” — as though he’s some sort of grumpy though beloved avuncular stand-up comic. Along with George W. Bush, one of the speakers in attendance was Vice President Joe Biden, who spoke movingly of Cheney’s kind and generous soul...

Bookmark and Share

Friday, December 04, 2015

Ken Jenkins and David Chandler: Pentagon Plane-Shills

I forced myself to watch this yesterday:

The first 30 minutes or so is a long compilation of witnesses to the Pentagon crash. My main thoughts about that are:
1) I'm amazed how many people knew what a 757 looked like from a plane rushing in like that.
2) wow, they had a lot of shills. Some of the witnesses were probably ordinary folks fooled by the fly-by and other trickery of the Pentagon hit, but there seemed to be a lot of true shills, in the sense that they just gave out the official story in too neat of a format. And the question always was-- how did the media find these "witnesses" exactly?

The 2nd half is classic shillery from David Chandler. I had a certain amount of respect for Chandler's work on WTC demolition, even though he promoted the thermite crap. But I thought his explanations of demolition were good and he didn't push thermite too heavily.

Here though, Chandler shows himself to be a fucking dupe or sell-out. He falls for every single fucking official Pentagon-hit fake clue out there.

Some of the huge obvious holes in his presentation are:

1) not discussing the Pentagon fly-over theory plus pre-planted bombs. Instead he discusses an absurd theory NO ONE really proposes at this point, that a helicopter shot down the plane in front of the Pentagon. This by itself, just shows what a massive shill he is.

2) he tries to shoot down the idea that the attack was really at 9:30, with some silly argument about falling wall clocks. Chandler REALLY needs to see Barbara Honegger's presentation on the Pentagon and especially the time.  The wrong time reported for the Pentagon-hit is based on far more than a falling wall clock.

3) he ignores the obvious problems with the damage scene at the Pentagon being from a plane hit, he ignores April Gallop's story and ignores basically every other piece of evidence against no plane strike

4) he uncritically present the ridiculous Lloyde England light-pole into cab story

5) he talks about a "glitch" in the FDR data showing the plane being too high to hit the Pentagon, but still ignores the fly-over story.

Overall, a classic bit of fucked up shillery, as he pretends to be a serious scientist. What a wanker.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, December 03, 2015

Back to 9/11

I updated some old compilations post with a couple new points each.

Up to 122 reasons now why I am a "no-planer".

Added the lack of BTS records for flights 11 and 77 to the list of improbabilities and coincidences around 9/11. Also, the idea that one plane could have been at all four 9/11 plane crashes.

Also, I added a few new links to those posts, though at some point I really need to do it systematically and thoroughly.

And yeah, the list of improbabilities and coincidences around 9/11 probably needs many new additions, but it's such a freaking long list of oddities as it is.
Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, December 02, 2015

So Alex Jones is Now a GOP Operative?

What. The. Fuck.

He totally sucks up to Trump, and says fucking nothing about 9/11 being an inside job. They go on about Muslims celebrating 9/11 and Osama bin Laden being behind 9/11. Jones says 90% of his listeners support him?

What a fucking piece of shit sell-out.


So we have this weird disconnect between Jones/followers who think terror attacks/shootings are a govt hoax, and conservatives who are afraid of Islamic terror. Trump and Jones are straddling this line of incoherence and illogic.

It also bears mentioning that TRUMP is the freaking GOP front-runner and has a good chance of winning the nomination at this point. If that happens, it's quite possible that Trump wins the presidency if there is some bad luck on the Dem side, a terror attack or something.

Bookmark and Share

Another Day in America, Another Shooting

Martial law coming any day now...

Big question is whether it is right-wing loonies or real brown ISIS terrorists... not sure which is worse.

Funny how this will completely distract from what is going on in Paris....
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, December 01, 2015

Paris Climate Talks-- the PTB Are Letting Us Burn Our Way to Mass Death

PABLO SOLÓN: I have been in two very important summits, the one in Copenhagen and then one in Cancun. And here, what we’re going to have in Paris, is the third climate agreement. We have had two climate agreements, one was the Kyoto protocol and the other one was the Cancun agreement. The Cancun agreement is for 2012 until 2020. And now in Paris, we’re supposed to have a third agreement for 2020 until 2030. 
Now, the Paris agreement is going to be as bad as the Cancun agreement. Why? Because in reality, we’re not here to negotiate the emission cuts of any country. The way negotiations are is each country says, I’m going to do this, and that’s it. So the U.S. says, we’re going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions between 25 percent to 28 percent by 2025, and that is their pledge. That is not under discussion. 
So already, all of the countries have presented their pledges until the first of October. So we already know the result of Paris. There is an official document from the UNFCCC that says, OK, after receiving the contribution of emission cuts of all of the countries, where are we now? And that official document says, we are going to be, around, increasing the temperature between 2.7 to 3.9 degrees Celsius. 
So that is a almost twice what we had to limit because the target was we shouldn’t go beyond an increase of two degrees Celsius. And now to be speaking about four degrees or five degrees Celsius is, to put it in other terms, to burn the planet. So the Paris agreement is an agreement that will see the planet burn. I think this is a really bad agreement. And we are here in the show to try to sell the world a good outcome that is going to kill humans and life as we know it.
It's just sickening how we won't let go of our addiction to energy from coal, oil and gas, which causes so much carbon pollution.  It's cheap energy to produce, but it's dirty and it's fouling the atmosphere and warming the planet. Basically, we are burning carbon that was stored up in the earth by plants and animals over millions of years, and transferring it back into the atmosphere very rapidly-- over a matter of 100 years. It's a huge shock to the climate and to life on earth. Ocean life is also suffering from acidification due to CO2 dissolving in them.

To stop catastrophic warming, there needs to be a reduction in CO2 already in the atmosphere, not just a limitation of how much CO2 is produced over the next 15 years.

To really stop massive warming, we need to keep 80% of remaining fossil fuels in the ground. We also need to curtail the production of meat from animal agriculture--- another huge source of greenhouse gases.

To prevent planetary ecocide, we need massive changes in the way we live, in our economy and in our energy system and food systems. No leader seems willing to step up to the plate to do this.

We are screwed.

Bookmark and Share

"Still need proof that humans went to the Moon?"

Heh heh, now that you ask... yes.

So, where is the proof?

In this "news", some guy says he "found the impact crater where the Apollo 16 rocket booster crashed on the Moon."

This is the totality their evidence-- a picture of a crater:

There's no explanation of how he knows this is the booster or anything, it just is, dammit.

Pretty convincing, isn't it?
Bookmark and Share

Powered by Blogger