Humint Events Online: 9/11 Disinformation and What We Know

Friday, September 10, 2004

9/11 Disinformation and What We Know

If we assume the official 9/11 story is NOT true, and that 9/11 was in fact a covert operation planned (and run?) by US intelligence agents, it behooves us to think that these planners put in place a set of false leads or built-in disinformaiton that will leave major road-blocks for those trying to uncover the truth about 9/11.

My sincere hope is that 9/11 does not get bogged down in what happened with people researching JFK assassination conspiracies. That is, the majority of the public believes that the official story is wrong, but nonetheless people are powerless to get answers for what really happened from the government. My impression for why JFK conspiracies have not uncovered the truth is: a) government secrecy and b) built-in false leads to stymie investigators.

Clearly, these things are happening with the 9/11 truth movement. We are stymied by government secrecy as well as false leads that are undoubtedly planted on purpose. I can only hope that the large number of people interested in the truth about 9/11, plus the large number of people who died, plus the wonder of the internet will help us crack open the truth for 9/11. I still worry the government will not simply open up, but will reveal layer of layer of false leads relating to 9/11, and we may not know what really happened for another generation.

Here are some of the things I believe are built-in false leads and false alternative leads (i.e. disinformation):
1) Osama bin Laden and the named hijackers
2) connections to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia
3) the money trail to the 9/11 hijackers
4) the Israeli spy-ring story
5) the Pentagon surveillance video


Here are the things I think they don't want us to think about and therefore may represent true leads:
1) that none of the hijacked planes never officially reported hijackings to ATC.
2) the lack of info on the contents and status of the black boxes-- suggests the info they contain is something the government doesn't want us to know about
3) the damage to the Pentagon
4) the unlikelihood of cell phones calls from flight 93
5) the several air-defense exercises run on and before 9/11 and who was in charge
6) how WTC1, 2 and 7 collapsed

Here are things I am unsure about whether they are key data or disinfo:
1) discrepencies in airphone calls from the hijacked planes
2) the lack of flying ability by the hijackers

This is what I can think of for now. I'm sure I will have more to say later on.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Disinfo?

Lots of the web links on this site are disinformation. Some of the links are good, others are silly nonsense.

9/11 Closeup
a site praising the "webfairy" theory (ie. disinfo) that missiles were fired at the WTC.

911 Review
see http://www.911review.com for a detailed rebuttal of how this disinfo site distracts from best evidence and promotes disproved crap

911 Strike
another site muddying the waters with a mix of truth and lies. This site tried to disrupt the International Inquiry into 9/11 in San Francisco in March 2004.

911 Uncovered
fun with photoshop


911 Truth Movement Musings
sniping against 9/11 activists from a "snitch jacket" (someone who makes false claims that hard working activists are really government agents)


Killtown
more disinformation about the Pentagon crash

INN World Report
an underground media site in New York that has published 9/11 investigative reports. The report on the 9/11 war games was very good. Other reports by a pseudonymous writer claiming plane substitution on the basis of leaps of logic (and an absence of hard facts) are highly questionable, if not fraudulent.

The Mysteries of 9/11
more fun with photoshop

9/11 Skeptics Unite!
gossip column from a pod theory supporter

Physics911
a bogus site pretending to expose the "science" of 9/11
promotes pods, fake claims of no plane at the Pentagon, and seems to be the source of the "fake cell phone calls" (the best way to discredit 9/11 skeptics among the family members)

Center for an Informed America
a site that published accurate info about 9/11 complicity within days of the attack, then went on to praise Stalinism and now spends much energy attacking Michael Ruppert (just in time for his book to be published) and the reality that petroleum is finite

Tom Flocco
has written good articles on 9/11, but has also been promoting 9/11 disinfo (letsroll911) on his site in recent months

Prison Planet
a site that mixes good information with bad - needs an editor and a fact checker

Public Action (Carol Valentine)
site attacks Phil Berg, attorney for 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani in her RICO suit against Bush, et. al.


The Movement
many questionable claims

3:39 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger