Humint Events Online: Pod Retraction

Tuesday, September 07, 2004

Pod Retraction

After further review, I have decided not to consider the strange bulge under flight 175 as a "pod": an added-on weapon of some sort. I think the "pod" is most likely just a trick of the light and angle of the plane. The "pod" was always quite unlikely anyway. Still unresolved, I think, is whether the plane that flew into the south tower was really flight 175. This is based on the proportions of the plane-- since the striking plane seems to look like a 757-300, not a 757-200 series.

I'm still working under the assumption that the plane that struck the Pentagon was not flight 77 (maybe a "plane-bomb" of some sort), and if I can make this assumption, then having flight 175 switched to another flight is not too hard to imagine. The key, really, is what happened at the Pentagon.....

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

the "POD" is just a bad joke

it is a carefully selected, contrast enhanced photo of the normal oval shaped connection between the wing and the fuselage

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html and http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/pod.html have good photographic debunkng of this

3:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger