The Hijackers on 9/11
Were planes on the morning of 9/11 really hijacked by Arabs at all?
Were the 19 faces they put out there just fall guys and a nice cover story?
Several things suggest this may be the case:
1) many of the "hijackers" have turned up alive. Even Mohammed Atta was alive after 9/11 according to his father.
2) none of the four planes sent a normal hijacking signal. Why not? If foreigners tried to take over the plane, wouldn't the pilots set this off?
3) the flying of the planes was performed much too expertly for the known skill level of the hijackers
4) the hijackers weren't on the flight manifests.
5) the main evidence supporting the existence of the hijackers comes from cell phones calls-- which were likely faked since cell phones call can't me made from fast high-flying planes.
6) the way the hijackers were identified after the attacks, with the cars containing the flight manuals and the Korans, smells strongly of planted evidence.
The no hijacker theory fits nicely with the plane-bomb theory.
Okay, then what really happened to Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93?
Since the transponders were turned off, who the hell knows where they really went?
I'll have to think about it some more.
Were the 19 faces they put out there just fall guys and a nice cover story?
Several things suggest this may be the case:
1) many of the "hijackers" have turned up alive. Even Mohammed Atta was alive after 9/11 according to his father.
2) none of the four planes sent a normal hijacking signal. Why not? If foreigners tried to take over the plane, wouldn't the pilots set this off?
3) the flying of the planes was performed much too expertly for the known skill level of the hijackers
4) the hijackers weren't on the flight manifests.
5) the main evidence supporting the existence of the hijackers comes from cell phones calls-- which were likely faked since cell phones call can't me made from fast high-flying planes.
6) the way the hijackers were identified after the attacks, with the cars containing the flight manuals and the Korans, smells strongly of planted evidence.
The no hijacker theory fits nicely with the plane-bomb theory.
Okay, then what really happened to Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93?
Since the transponders were turned off, who the hell knows where they really went?
I'll have to think about it some more.
posted by spooked at 10:53 PM
1 Comments:
1) The hijackers used stolen identities of living/dead Muslim men (including pilots).
3) Some of the plane pilots trained at secure military bases and may have trained in Middle Eastern air forces prior to that. Why they would decide to train at 2-bit flying schools is an issue that needs explanation.
5) An experiment to substantiate these claims would need to know the exact altitudes and phone companies and be in the same locations -- which is probably impossible to do. However, many alleged cell phone calls did have the ring of fakery.
6) Agreed. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe "Mohamed Atta's" rental car containing the Koran and other incriminating evidence (flight manuals, videos, etc…) was left at Boston Logan rather than Portland.
I think Flight 11 N334AA & Flight 175 N612UA did crash into the Twin Towers. My website offers several theories for Flight 77 N644AA, the patsy plane for the Pentagon attack. I believe Flight 93 N591UA was shot down, considering the very wide debris field (including charred human bones found 2 miles away).
Post a Comment
<< Home