Planned Demolition of the WTC Towers
Now that we know that the military was clearly thinking about highjacked airplanes striking the WTC, and was even running a live-fly exercise to mimic such a situation, it is time to think once again about the apparent controlled demolition of the twin towers.
I can very well imagine that the planners of these live-fly exercises had to worry-- what if the exercise went wrong and a plane did hit the WTC? What would happen?
Conceivably, there could be catastrophic damage (worse than 9/11) if a tower hit by an airplane caused all or part of the tower to topple over in an uncontrolled manner, and it landed on many surrounding buildings. Thus, I can imagine that the planners (possibly FEMA) thought they should have the towers pre-packed with demolitions as a "safety back-up". Thus, if it looked like one of the towers was starting to break apart because of a plane attack, they would blow the whole tower up in a controlled manner.
And indeed-- this is what seemed to happen. The first thing that happened is that the top thirty stories or so of the south tower started to break off at a tilted angle. It looked as though this huge chunk of building would crash down a thousand feet and be horribly destructive to the surroundings of the towers. Thus, as soon as the top of the tower started to break off, the tower was demolished into a fine powder in a matter of seconds. What therefore seems likely is that the controlled demolition was triggered by the top breaking off. Once they demolished the south tower, that left too many questions, so they had to demolish the north tower as well. Waiting too long to destroy the north tower would have raised suspicions as well, which is why they decided to "pull" the north tower even though hundreds of people were still inside. Possibly they would use the excuse that they thought the north tower was about to break apart as well.
In any case, I won't be surprised if an eventual fall-back position for the 9/11 planners is that demolitions were planted in the WTC as a safety valve in case of an unpredictable break up of the buildings.
I can very well imagine that the planners of these live-fly exercises had to worry-- what if the exercise went wrong and a plane did hit the WTC? What would happen?
Conceivably, there could be catastrophic damage (worse than 9/11) if a tower hit by an airplane caused all or part of the tower to topple over in an uncontrolled manner, and it landed on many surrounding buildings. Thus, I can imagine that the planners (possibly FEMA) thought they should have the towers pre-packed with demolitions as a "safety back-up". Thus, if it looked like one of the towers was starting to break apart because of a plane attack, they would blow the whole tower up in a controlled manner.
And indeed-- this is what seemed to happen. The first thing that happened is that the top thirty stories or so of the south tower started to break off at a tilted angle. It looked as though this huge chunk of building would crash down a thousand feet and be horribly destructive to the surroundings of the towers. Thus, as soon as the top of the tower started to break off, the tower was demolished into a fine powder in a matter of seconds. What therefore seems likely is that the controlled demolition was triggered by the top breaking off. Once they demolished the south tower, that left too many questions, so they had to demolish the north tower as well. Waiting too long to destroy the north tower would have raised suspicions as well, which is why they decided to "pull" the north tower even though hundreds of people were still inside. Possibly they would use the excuse that they thought the north tower was about to break apart as well.
In any case, I won't be surprised if an eventual fall-back position for the 9/11 planners is that demolitions were planted in the WTC as a safety valve in case of an unpredictable break up of the buildings.
posted by spooked at 10:55 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home