Call Me a Conspiracy Kook--
but even though a 757 landing gear was (apparently) found in the pentagon, I am not totally convinced a 757 plane hit there.
This is for many reasons, such as the approach path, the exit hole, and so forth-- as I have discussed here many times.
I hate to say a 757 landing gear was PLANTED there, but on the other hand, I really wonder if a plane's nose cone was planted in the Pentagon.
This is one reason I am suspicious that parts were planted: the story of the nose cone.
We're expected to believe the nose piece survived going through all these walls:
"Mr. LEE EVEY (Program Manager Pentagon Renovation Project): The airplane traveled in a path about like this, and the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring into AE drive.
(World News Tonight Saturday (6:30 PM ET) - ABC September 15, 2001 Saturday)"
"Fire Captain Michael Defina - MWAA: "The aircraft had penetrated all the way to the "C" ring. The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear." "
"Mr. RUMSFELD: Yeah. And then came in about—between about the first and second floor over here. And it went in through three rings. I’m told the nose is—is still in there , very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away.
(ABC News SHOW: Good Morning America (6:00 AM ET) - ABC September 13, 2001 Thursday)"
The nose of a large jet is fairly fragile. Yet the landing gear, which is a thousand times tougher, gets totally mangled during the crash?
It makes no sense.
And of course, I have to point out, that we really don't know where that picture of a landing gear came from, and even though it is probably the inside of the pentagon, do we know this for sure?
Could some sort of small plane carrying a missile and a cache of 757 parts have crashed at the pentagon? Were 757 parts simply planted at the pentagon before the crash? Are the pictures fakes or disinfo? These ideas sound ridiculous but at least they can explain the evidence.
Certainly, someone was going to great lengths to say a nose cone went through the pentagon walls when that is clearly absurd.
And one of the main problems with the 757 theory-- how on earth was Washington DC left without air defenses for 40 minutes after it was clear there was a terror attack AND when it was clear there was a hijacked jet heading back towards DC? But if something else hit the pentagon, perhaps this is how the air defenses were fooled.
The pentagon mystery continues.
This is for many reasons, such as the approach path, the exit hole, and so forth-- as I have discussed here many times.
I hate to say a 757 landing gear was PLANTED there, but on the other hand, I really wonder if a plane's nose cone was planted in the Pentagon.
This is one reason I am suspicious that parts were planted: the story of the nose cone.
We're expected to believe the nose piece survived going through all these walls:
"Mr. LEE EVEY (Program Manager Pentagon Renovation Project): The airplane traveled in a path about like this, and the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring into AE drive.
(World News Tonight Saturday (6:30 PM ET) - ABC September 15, 2001 Saturday)"
"Fire Captain Michael Defina - MWAA: "The aircraft had penetrated all the way to the "C" ring. The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear." "
"Mr. RUMSFELD: Yeah. And then came in about—between about the first and second floor over here. And it went in through three rings. I’m told the nose is—is still in there , very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away.
(ABC News SHOW: Good Morning America (6:00 AM ET) - ABC September 13, 2001 Thursday)"
The nose of a large jet is fairly fragile. Yet the landing gear, which is a thousand times tougher, gets totally mangled during the crash?
It makes no sense.
And of course, I have to point out, that we really don't know where that picture of a landing gear came from, and even though it is probably the inside of the pentagon, do we know this for sure?
Could some sort of small plane carrying a missile and a cache of 757 parts have crashed at the pentagon? Were 757 parts simply planted at the pentagon before the crash? Are the pictures fakes or disinfo? These ideas sound ridiculous but at least they can explain the evidence.
Certainly, someone was going to great lengths to say a nose cone went through the pentagon walls when that is clearly absurd.
And one of the main problems with the 757 theory-- how on earth was Washington DC left without air defenses for 40 minutes after it was clear there was a terror attack AND when it was clear there was a hijacked jet heading back towards DC? But if something else hit the pentagon, perhaps this is how the air defenses were fooled.
The pentagon mystery continues.
posted by spooked at 10:42 AM
1 Comments:
what i would like to find out is if a Global Hawk uses the same type landing gear. that would then explain a lot.
Post a Comment
<< Home